Showing 3 results for Problem Solving
Mss Soheila Jalilian, Mr Ehsan Azimpoor, Mss Fariba Jalilian,
Volume 3, Issue 32 (8-2016)
Abstract
This study examined the effects of Philosophy for Children Program (P4C) on the problem solving abilities and Moral Judgment of nurturance in the third Grade Primary Students of east Eslam Abad. The Population of this research was all the girl students in the third Grade in 2014- 2015 academic year. The research method a pre-test post-test design with control group was used. To this end, we chose 80 students to random cluster sampling in two groups experimental (n=40) and control (n=40) through randomized placement technique. For data gathering in this research the Long and Cassidy problem-solving questionnaire (1996) and Moral Judgment Test (MJT) were used. After this, the philosophy for children program was performed in 12 sessions for the experimental group. At the end of this intervention, post-tests was performed on participates of both groups. The results of analysis of covariance showed that the difference between the means of the two groups was significant (p<0.001), In other words of teaching philosophy to children to enhance students' problem solving ability and moral judgment had a positive effect. Also, the effect of the increase in problem-solving and moral judgment teaching philosophy to children by gender were not significant.
Mis Fatemeh Kashi, Mis Mansoreh Bahramipour,
Volume 15, Issue 49 (11-2024)
Abstract
Aim and Background: The aim of the current research was to investigate the effectiveness of Quist's parenting toolkit on intimacy in the family, parents' interactive skills, social problem solving, and discipline of 8-12-year-old moladaptive children.
Methods and Materials: The research method was a semi-experimental design with a pre-test, post-test and follow-up period with a control groupThe research population included all mothers with maladjusted children aged 8 to 12 in the spring of 2012 in Isfahan city. The research sample was selected by available sampling method and 40 people were randomly assigned to two experimental and control groups (20 people in each group). The research tools include 3 Connors behavioral problems grading scale (especially for parents) (1978), Alexis et al.'s Intimacy Questionnaire (1983), Pianta's Parent-Child Interaction Questionnaire (2014), Dzurila et al.'s Social Problem Solving Questionnaire (2002) and Children's Organizational Skills Scale , the parent form was Abikov and Gallacker (2009). Quist's parenting toolbox program (2012) was implemented on the experimental group during 12 90-minute sessions twice a week; But the control group did not receive any intervention.
Findings: The data were analyzed through the analysis of variance test with repeated measurements. The results showed that the parenting toolkit is effective on intimacy in the family, interactive skills of parents, social problem solving and discipline of 8-12 year old maladjusted children.
Conclusions: According to the findings of the research, It can be concluded that this intervention is effective in increasing intimacy in the family, parents' interactive skills, social problem solving, and discipline of 8-12-year-old maladjusted children.
Mahboobeh Alborzi, Fariba Khoshbakht, Fatemeh Mehni,
Volume 15, Issue 49 (11-2024)
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to study the role of learning skills and social problem solving in the social creativity.The participants of the research were 46 girls & 133 boys from elementary students who were selected by random cluster sampling. The research tools were learning skills scale (Ahmadi, 2016), social problem solving inventory (D’Zurilla&Nezu, 2002) and social creativity task (Mouchiroud& Lubart, 2002).The results showed a significant relationship between social creativity with observation (r= 0.14), hypothesizing( r = 0.35), interpretation (r=0.11) and communication (r=0.21). There was a correlation between social creativity and constructive problem solving (r=0.34) and non-constructive problem solving (r=-0.28). The regression results showed that hypothesizing predicted 26% and hypothesizing and communication skills together predicted 32% of the variance of social creativity. Constructive problem solving explained 35% and constructive problem solving and non-constructive problem solving together explained 38% of the variance of social creativity. Finally, the results showed 30% of the variance of social creativity explained through hypothesizing, communication and constructive problem solving.
