Volume 11, Issue 3 (12-2024)
Human Information Interaction 2024, 11(3): 97-112 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
hamdipour A, atapour H, kajaiee N. Analysis of personality traits affecting the information-seeking behavior of graduate students of Tabriz University. Human Information Interaction 2024; 11 (3)
URL: http://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3178-en.html
URL: http://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3178-en.html
University of Tabriz
Abstract: (4016 Views)
Information Seeking Behavior is a broad term encompassing a series of actions undertaken to articulate individuals’ information needs, search for information, evaluate it and select relevant data, ultimately leading to its use (Ozowa and Aba, 2017). According to Case and Given (2016), information-seeking is an integral part of human life. They note that humans frequently feel the need for information and actively seek it throughout their daily lives. In their research, which examined the information-seeking behaviors of professionals from various fields, including physicians, nurses, managers, engineers, journalists, customers, and other groups, the authors found significant differences in the information-seeking behaviors of various professions. These differences can be attributed to professional roles, work environments, and specific information needs. As a dimension of human behavior, information-seeking is influenced by numerous factors. Given the critical role of psychological aspects in shaping human information-seeking behavior and their impact on the interaction between humans and information, addressing these factors is vital. The increasing focus on user-centered (human-centered) studies in recent decades highlights the importance of such studies. This research explores personality traits that influence the information-seeking behavior of graduate students at the University of Tabriz.
Methods and Materials
This study used a descriptive-survey method. The statistical population comprised 2,826 graduate students (2,258 master’s and 568 doctoral students from 17 faculties at the University of Tabriz, excluding dependent units and the international campus, during the first semester of the 2022-2023 academic year. The students were enrolled in four fields: humanities, basic sciences, engineering, and agriculture. Using Cochran’s formula, the sample size was calculated to be 338 students selected through stratified random sampling. The study employed a localized version of John and Srivastava’s (1999) questionnaire for data collection. The questionnaire included two sections: six demographic items and 42 items rated on a five-point Likert scale to assess information-seeking behavior and five personality traits (Extraversion, Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, Openness to Experience, Neuroticism). Validity was ensured through expert review by five faculty members, and reliability was confirmed using Cronbach’s alpha, with coefficients ranging from 0.588 to 0.903. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (frequency, mean, standard deviation) and inferential statistics (multiple linear regression). Skewness and kurtosis coefficients that fell within ±2 confirmed the normal distribution of the data.
Results and Discussion
The findings of the present study showed that all five dimensions of personality traits (extroversion, conscientiousness, adaptability, acceptance of experience, and neuroticism with averages of 4.13, 3.94, 3.99, 4.11, and 2.69 respectively) have a significant effect on the information-seeking behavior of graduate students at Tabriz University; Specifically, Extraversion, Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, and Openness to Experience demonstrated positive effects, while Neuroticism exhibited a negative effect. Other results showed that among information-seeking behaviors, "referring to the Internet to obtain information" has the highest priority among students, with an average of 4.72. In the extraversion dimension, "being friendly in the process of acquiring information" is the most important, with an average of 4.34. In the dimension of conscientiousness, "observance of order in the process of obtaining information" has the highest average score, with an average score of 4.22. In the adaptability dimension, "tendency to cooperate with others during information searching" has the highest score with an average of 4.29. In the experience acceptance dimension, "having an active imagination in the information seeking process" has the highest rank with an average of 4.42. In the dimension of neuroticism, "being nervous in the process of finding information" is the highest average score (3.03). The results of multiple linear regression also showed that the independent variables, extroversion, conscientiousness, adaptability, acceptance of experience, and neuroticism are significant predictors of information-seeking behavior, which explain 25.6% of the changes related to the dependent variable. Among the 5 independent variables, the conscientiousness variable, with a beta coefficient of 0.220, made a greater contribution than the other variables.
Conclusion
The findings of this study confirmed the effect of five important personality traits on information-seeking behavior. It is expected that librarians and information specialists will consider the different aspects of personality traits in information-seeking behavior and pay attention to the fact that knowledge of these issues will help them to provide effective information services to students. According to the findings of the present study, it is recommended that the libraries of University of Tabriz establish information systems based on individual student differences to facilitate an optimal environment for information searching. In addition, organizing workshops on communication skills can help students perform more effectively in information-seeking activities. These skills can be beneficial for both extroverted and even neurotic students. It is also recommended that information system designers tailor their systems and services based on the needs and personality traits of students. Furthermore, it is recommended that librarians receive the necessary training to identify students’ individual characteristics and differences and provide information services tailored to their personality traits during interactions with users. Finally, offering psychological counseling and stress management support for students can help them reduce their anxiety and improve their performance in information-seeking activities. This is particularly beneficial for students with high neuroticism levels.
Methods and Materials
This study used a descriptive-survey method. The statistical population comprised 2,826 graduate students (2,258 master’s and 568 doctoral students from 17 faculties at the University of Tabriz, excluding dependent units and the international campus, during the first semester of the 2022-2023 academic year. The students were enrolled in four fields: humanities, basic sciences, engineering, and agriculture. Using Cochran’s formula, the sample size was calculated to be 338 students selected through stratified random sampling. The study employed a localized version of John and Srivastava’s (1999) questionnaire for data collection. The questionnaire included two sections: six demographic items and 42 items rated on a five-point Likert scale to assess information-seeking behavior and five personality traits (Extraversion, Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, Openness to Experience, Neuroticism). Validity was ensured through expert review by five faculty members, and reliability was confirmed using Cronbach’s alpha, with coefficients ranging from 0.588 to 0.903. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (frequency, mean, standard deviation) and inferential statistics (multiple linear regression). Skewness and kurtosis coefficients that fell within ±2 confirmed the normal distribution of the data.
Results and Discussion
The findings of the present study showed that all five dimensions of personality traits (extroversion, conscientiousness, adaptability, acceptance of experience, and neuroticism with averages of 4.13, 3.94, 3.99, 4.11, and 2.69 respectively) have a significant effect on the information-seeking behavior of graduate students at Tabriz University; Specifically, Extraversion, Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, and Openness to Experience demonstrated positive effects, while Neuroticism exhibited a negative effect. Other results showed that among information-seeking behaviors, "referring to the Internet to obtain information" has the highest priority among students, with an average of 4.72. In the extraversion dimension, "being friendly in the process of acquiring information" is the most important, with an average of 4.34. In the dimension of conscientiousness, "observance of order in the process of obtaining information" has the highest average score, with an average score of 4.22. In the adaptability dimension, "tendency to cooperate with others during information searching" has the highest score with an average of 4.29. In the experience acceptance dimension, "having an active imagination in the information seeking process" has the highest rank with an average of 4.42. In the dimension of neuroticism, "being nervous in the process of finding information" is the highest average score (3.03). The results of multiple linear regression also showed that the independent variables, extroversion, conscientiousness, adaptability, acceptance of experience, and neuroticism are significant predictors of information-seeking behavior, which explain 25.6% of the changes related to the dependent variable. Among the 5 independent variables, the conscientiousness variable, with a beta coefficient of 0.220, made a greater contribution than the other variables.
Conclusion
The findings of this study confirmed the effect of five important personality traits on information-seeking behavior. It is expected that librarians and information specialists will consider the different aspects of personality traits in information-seeking behavior and pay attention to the fact that knowledge of these issues will help them to provide effective information services to students. According to the findings of the present study, it is recommended that the libraries of University of Tabriz establish information systems based on individual student differences to facilitate an optimal environment for information searching. In addition, organizing workshops on communication skills can help students perform more effectively in information-seeking activities. These skills can be beneficial for both extroverted and even neurotic students. It is also recommended that information system designers tailor their systems and services based on the needs and personality traits of students. Furthermore, it is recommended that librarians receive the necessary training to identify students’ individual characteristics and differences and provide information services tailored to their personality traits during interactions with users. Finally, offering psychological counseling and stress management support for students can help them reduce their anxiety and improve their performance in information-seeking activities. This is particularly beneficial for students with high neuroticism levels.
Keywords: Information-Seeking Behavior, Information Need, Personality Traits, Individual differences, Postgraduate Students
References
1. Abouzeid, E., Fouad, S., Wasfy, N. F., Alkhadragy, R., Hefny, M., and Kamal, D. (2021). Influence of Personality Traits and Learning Styles on Undergraduate Medical Students' Academic Achievement. Adv Med Educ Pract, 12, 769-777. [DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S314644]
2. Ahmed, S., Rehman, F. and Sheikh, A. (2019). Impact of personality traits on the information needs and seeking behavior of LIS students in Pakistan. Information Discovery and Delivery, 47(3), 125-134. [DOI:10.1108/IDD-09-2018-0046]
3. Ali, I. (2019). Personality traits, individual innovativeness, and satisfaction with life. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 4(1), 38-46. [DOI:10.1016/j.jik.2017.11.002]
4. Al-Samarraie, H., Eldenfria, A., & Dawoud, H. (2017). The impact of personality traits on information-seeking behavior. Information Processing and Management, 53(1), 237-247. [DOI:10.1016/j.ipm.2016.08.004]
5. Case, D. O., and Given, L. M. (2016). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. [DOI:10.1108/S2055-53772016022]
6. Charoenkul, S. and Chanchalor, S. (2021). Information seeking behavior and personality traits in secondary-school students. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 405-420. [DOI:10.29333/iji.2021.14223a]
7. Costa Jr, P., & McCrae, R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic, Personality and ındividual differences, 13 (6), 653-665. Personality and ındividual differences, 6(13), 653-665. [DOI:10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I]
8. Ekoja, I. I. (2010). Information needs and behaviors of populations in less developed regions. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, 4, 2467-2474. [DOI:10.1081/E-ELIS3-120043726]
9. Halder, S., Roy, A., & Chakraborty, P. (2010). The influence of personality traits on information seeking behavior of students. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 15(1), 41-53.
10. Heinström, J. (2003). Five personality dimensions and their influence on information behavior. Information research, 9(1), 1-9.
11. Heinström, J., Sormunen, E., & Kaunisto-Laine, S. (2014). Spanning information behavior across the stages of a learning task: where do personality and approach to studying matter? Journal of Documentation, 70(6), 1076-1097. [DOI:10.1108/JD-02-2014-0041]
12. Ishtiaq, N., Butt, A. A., & Siddiqi, A. (2023). The relationship and impact of information seeking anxiety and personality traits and health information seeking behavior during COVID-19. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences, 17(04), 133-133. [DOI:10.53350/pjmhs2023174133]
13. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 2nd ed. (pp. 102-138). New York: Guilford Press.
14. Johnson, E. C., Mao Y, McKay D. (2021). Personality traits and information seeking in the digital age: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Information Science, 47(2), 210-226.
15. Köseoglu, Y. (2016). To what extent can the big five and learning styles predict academic achievement. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(30), 43-51.
16. Li, B. B., & Huang, H. W. (2024). Cognition and beyond intersections of personality traits and language. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 80, 105-148. [DOI:10.1016/bs.plm.2024.03.003]
17. Matzler, K., Renzl, B., Müller, J., Herting, S., & Mooradian, T. A. (2008). Personality traits and knowledge sharing. Journal of economic psychology, 29(3), 301-313 [DOI:10.1016/j.joep.2007.06.004]
18. Ozowa, V., and Aba, J. (2017). The effect of personality traits on the information-seeking behavior of postgraduate students in benue state, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1700, 1-80.
19. Rimfeld, K., Kovas, Y., Dale, P. S., and Plomin, R. (2016). True grit and genetics: Predicting academic achievement from personality. Journal of personality and social psychology, 111(5), 780-789. [DOI:10.1037/pspp0000089]
20. Roberts, B. W., J. Luo, D. A. Briley, P. I. Chow, R. Su, and P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological bulletin, 143(2), 117-141. [DOI:10.1037/bul0000088]
21. Safron, A., & DeYoung, C. G. (2021). Chapter 18-Integrating Cybernetic Big Five Theory with the free-energy principle: A new strategy for modeling personalities as complex systems. D. Wood, S. J. Read, P. D. Harms, and A. Slaughter (Eds.). Measuring and modeling people and situations (pp. 617-649): Academic Press. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-819200-9.00010-7]
22. Widiger, T. A., & Oltmanns, J. R. (2017). Neuroticism is a fundamental domain of personality with enormous public health implications. World psychiatry, 16(2), 144-145. [DOI:10.1002/wps.20411]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
