[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Publication Statistics::
::
Publication Information
 
ju Publisher
Kharazmi University
ju Managing Director 
Prof. Fazel Asadi Amjad
ju Editor-in-Chief
Dr. Hossein Talebzadeh

EISSN:
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Indexing Databases
SID
ISC
Civilica
Magiran
Noormags
Google Scholar
Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies
..
:: Search published articles ::
Showing 1 results for Hodge and Kress’s Framework

Mohammad Rahimi, Ehya Amal Saleh, Sanaz Deghat,
Volume 13, Issue 2 (9-2010)
Abstract

Critical discourse analysis (CDA) provides an analytical and political approach to language in context and it concerns with manifestations of ideology and power/dominance relations in society, manifestations of social asymmetry via discourse, racism, sexism and in general segregation and discrimination (Wodak and Meyer, 2001). The present study, applying some of the most agreed upon guidelines of critical discourse analysis, aimed at analyzing the discursive structures of the 2008 presidential campaign speeches of democratic candidates--Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama--to see if they carry and enforce certain ideologies. The methodology used in this study was generally based upon Hodge and Kress’s (1996) framework and the texts were compared and contrasted to find the traces of gender and/or race of the candidates. From among a hundred tapescripts, fifty were randomly selected. The results of the study showed the discoursal features used in the speeches made by the two candidates were significantly influenced by their race and gender.

Page 1 from 1     

Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 1.34 seconds with 29 queries by YEKTAWEB 4729