|
|
|
 |
جستجو در مقالات منتشر شده |
 |
|
6 نتیجه برای Literacy
Marzieh Souzandehfar، Mahboobeh Saadat، Rahman Sahragard،
دوره 17، شماره 2 - ( 6-1393 )
چکیده
، ،
دوره 19، شماره 2 - ( 6-1395 )
چکیده
معصومه تقی زاده، گلنار مزدایسنا، فاطمه مهدی راد،
دوره 23، شماره 2 - ( 6-1399 )
چکیده
در نظام آموزشی ایران، سواد سنجش زبان به حد کافی مورد مورد بررسی قرار گرفته نشده است.تحقیق حاضر شکل گیری سواد سنجش را در میان دانشجویان زبان انگلیسی دانشگاههای دولتی که در حال گذراندن واحد آزمون سازی می باشند، بررسی می کند.سه عنصر مطرح شده برای سواد سنجش (دانش سنجش، مهارتهای سنجش و اصول سنجش)محوریت این تحقیق را شکل دادند. برای جمع آوری اطلاعات مورد نیاز، یک پرسشنامه ( شامل 83 ایتم لیکرت و تعدادی سوال باز) طراحی شد و پاسخهای 92 مدرس درس آزمون سازی گردآوری شد. فعالیتهای تدریس و سنجش دو مدرس درس مربوطه نیز از طریق مشاهده کلاسها مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. تحلیل داده ها از طریق نرم افزار(26)SPSS صورت گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که در این دوره های آموزشی، تمرکز اصلی بر روی دانش سنجش و تا حدی مهارتهای سنجش می باشد و اصول مربوط به سنجش نادیده گرفته شده اند. تکیه بر روشهای سنتی سنجش، بکارگیری منابع آموزشی نامناسب و فقدان فعالیتهای عملی مرتبط با سنجش از دیگر ویژگیهای این کلاسهای درس آزمون سازی می باشد. در پایان پیشنهاداتی برای طراحی و ارائه بهتر درس آزمون سازی جهت افزایش سطح سواد سنجش دانشجویان رشته زبان که اغلب پس از فارغ التحصیلی وارد حوزه تدریس می شوند، مطرح شده است.
Fateme Pirbeig،
دوره 25، شماره 2 - ( 6-1401 )
چکیده
The process of foreign language syntactic development regarding learners’ L1 literacy level is different among adult learners. Many studies have shown that illiterate and low-literate learners follow the same path in the L2 morphosyntax development despite their L1 literacy level. However, little research has been carried out to focus on differences in the new language literacy development among learners with varying first language proficiency. Therefore, the current study was carried out to investigate the differences in learning English adjectival and prepositional phrases among three Kurdish adult groups of literate, low-literate, and illiterate learners in one term. Additionally, it probed the major difficulties they faced through the English phrase acquisition process. Mixed methods were used for data collection including observations of the classes supplemented by audio recording and English phrase tests. Through the application of three tests of recognition, matching, and multiple-choice type, the outcome knowledge of adjectival and prepositional phrases was assessed and compared among groups. The obtained data were analyzed through the Kruskal-Wallis test. Some tangible results were detected from tests that did not ascribe the differences in learning English absolutely to background schooling and literacy. In fact, they showed that there were significant differences among groups in matching and multiple-choice type post-tests, while there were no considerable differences in recognition-type post-test. Furthermore, results also revealed that illiterate and low-literate learners encountered further complicated difficulties and made an unusual combination of pronunciation and grammatical errors in their production.
Ahmadreza Eghtesadi Roudi،
دوره 26، شماره 2 - ( 6-1402 )
چکیده
Reading is the main language skill in English as a Foreign Language (EFL)contexts, and the key to the reading skill is the knowledge of the alphabet. Although there are various approaches to teaching early reading and the alphabet in L1, such as whole language, language experience, literature-based, whole word, alphabetic method, and analytic and synthetic phonics, the topic of teaching alphabet and early reading is almost missing in language teaching methodology textbooks, and the few sources which deal with the subject seem to be mainly concerned with English as a Second Language (ESL) contexts where the learners’ mother tongue also uses a Latin alphabet. Early reading and alphabet teaching in EFL contexts has also received little research attention, and many aspects of literacy teaching in these contexts such as the effectiveness of different approaches for different age groups are still a mystery. ELT community, hence, needs to pay more heed to the needs of teachers and learners in EFL contexts. This paper intends to sensitize the international ELT community, including the researchers, teachers, and publishers to the importance and necessity of taking early literacy in EFL contexts into account.
خانم Aysen Chokani، دکتر Hossein Navidinia،
دوره 27، شماره 1 - ( 1-1403 )
چکیده
The current study examines the interplay of Iranian EFL teachers' assessment literacy and self-efficacy. Therefore, firstly, it sought to examine whether these variables are significantly correlated. Secondly, it attempted to probe the demographic factors potentially influencing teachers' assessment literacy. To achieve this aim, a sample comprising 100 Iranian EFL teachers participated in this study by simultaneously filling out two questionnaires: Tschannen Moran and Hoy's (2001) teachers' self-efficacy scale and an abridged version of Teachers' Conceptions of Assessment Inventory-III (TCoA), validated by Brown (2006). The findings obtained from the study indicated a statistically significant relationship between Iranian EFL teachers' assessment literacy and their perceived self-efficacy, thereby highlighting the interconnectedness of these constructs within the context of educational practice. Furthermore, among the demographic variables examined (participants' gender, level of education, field of study, and age), teachers' assessment literacy is most significantly influenced by their level of education, suggesting a strong link between educational background and assessment competencies. The implications of these results for English language teachers are discussed.
|
|
صاحب امتیاز
