Mr. Mohammad-Emad Mahmoudi-Mehrizi, Prof Ali Ghanbari,
Volume 14, Issue 5 (12-2020)
Abstract
The use of piles, helical anchors and, in general, helical foundations has considerably increased in the last 30 years. The adoption of this technology in the international and domestic codes of each country, as well as in research and studies, and, finally, the publication of numerous books and papers in this area, and the existence of manufacturers’ products, committees, and contractors of this technology has contributed to its expansion and development. However, such methods have progressed at a very slow pace in many countries, especially in developing countries. This paper attempts to assess the global advancement of the helical foundations by reviewing 292 papers from 1990 to 2020 and comparing the related research findings. This will help clarify the issue and determine the scope of technological progress. On the other hand, collecting valuable papers in this area will make it easier for researchers to make further research. Subsequently, the characteristics of this technology are highlighted and the reasons for its lack of progress in the developing countries are addressed. For this purpose, a questionnaire is sent to researchers, developers, designers, and contractors of the geotechnical projects. The purpose of this questionnaire is to specify the type of existing projects, the soil type of project site, the degree of familiarity with the helical foundation technology, the reasons for not using this method and the solutions available to expand and develop this method. Finally, there are suggestions to develop this approach and the issues that need further research.
Mahmood Reza Abdi, Mahdi Safdari Seh Gonbad, Hoshmand Tirandazi,
Volume 15, Issue 3 (12-2021)
Abstract
In current paper the effects of surface unreinforced / reinforced sand layers coupled with and without single and group sand columns on the bearing capacity – settlement behavior of soft clays has been investigated. In this regard behavior of soft clay, clay + unreinforced / reinforced sand layer, clay + single / group sand piles and clay + unreinforced / reinforced sand layer + single / group piles samples has been assessed. Geogrid was adopted as the reinforcement, a circular plate 5cm in diameter as the loading surface and C.B.R. apparatus as the loading system. Results show that employing unreinforced / reinforced sand layers at a settlement ratio of 5% improves bearing capacity by 4 t0 7 times the soft clay. Coupling the surface unreinforced / reinforced sand layers with single / group sand piles further increases the bearing capacity by 7 to 9 times that of soft clay.
./files/site1/files/%D8%B9%D8%A8%D8%AF%DB%8C.pdf
Zahra Aghayan, Rouzbeh Dabiri,
Volume 18, Issue 3 (12-2024)
Abstract
Recently, the demand for rapid and cost-effective infrastructure development has led to the has led to the development of various soil improvement techniques, including stabilization. Studies on the incorporation of mineral materials such as lime and coal ash into soil stabilization have been carried out in several countries, and these studies have shown promising results. Given the beneficial properties or properties of coal ash, together with its availability and cost-effectiveness, the combination of coal ash with lime for clay soil stabilization is a viable option. This study evaluates lime and coal ash on the behavior and geotechnical properties of clay soils. The evaluation includes plasticity index (PI), compaction, uniaxial compressive strength, California bearing ratio (CBR) and direct shear tests, and direct shear tests. To achieve this, the process began with the mixing of clay with varying percentages of hydrated lime (4%, 6% and 7%), followed by a 28-day curing period for the samples. Coal ash was then added at different (5%, 15%, 25% and 50%) was incorporated into the clay and also cured for 28 days. In the final stage, the optimum amount of hydrated lime was determined, an amount of hydrated lime, equivalent to the amount of coal ash used, was added to the clay and the mixture was cured for a further 28 days. The results indicate that A mixture of 7% hydrated lime and 50% coal ash, after 28 days of curing, is an optimum combination for stabilizing the clay in the study area. This combination increased the uniaxial compressive strength by 1.87 times, the shear strength by 1.34 times and the CBR value by 6.4 times, making it suitable for use in the for use in the construction of pavement layers.
Soroush Mahdavian, Navid Rashidi, Ali Raeesi, Jamal Abdullahi,
Volume 19, Issue 1 (6-2025)
Abstract
Clay soils typically have low strength and a high swelling percentage. They are considered as problematic soils in Civil Engineering projects. This research study examined the effects of magnesium chloride (MgCl2) solution on the clay soil improvement through conducting laboratory experiments. The experimental program included Atterberg limits, compaction, swelling, unconfined compression strength (UCS) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) tests. Available clay soil in the Lab was mixed with MgCl2 solution at weight percentages of 3%, 5%, 7% and 10% Samples for the swelling and strength tests were made using thestatic compaction method. The moisture and dry unit weight of the prepared samples were the same as those of thecorresponding compaction curves. The strength test results showed that the final strengths of the samples with 3% MgCl₂ at 7-, 14-, and 28-day curing times were 1401, 2018, and 1848 kPa, respectively. The results also showed that a reduction in strength of the samples occurred with more than a 3% solution of MgCl₂. For samples with 10% MgCl2 solution, the strength decreased until 14 days of curing time, but increased thereafter. Additionally, the results indicated that the reduction in swelling percentage compared to natural soil was 4.95%, 3.98%, 2.8%, and 3.9% for samples with 3%, 5%, 7%, and 10% MgCl₂, respectively, showing that the reduction in swelling depends on the MgCl₂ percentage. Additionally, the SEM results showed that the improvement in the soil was due to chemical reactions between the soil and MgCl₂.
