Economic Impacts of Adopting Non-Price Energy Consumption Policies

Khoshkalam, Musa

doi:10.29252/jemr.8.29.37

Volume 8, Issue 29 (10-2017) jemr 2017, 8(29): 37-72 | Back to browse issues page

‎ 10.29252/jemr.8.29.37

‎ 20.1001.1.22286454.1396.8.29.5.4

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Khoshkalam M. Economic Impacts of Adopting Non-Price Energy Consumption Policies. jemr 2017; 8 (29) :37-72
URL: http://jemr.khu.ac.ir/article-1-1541-en.html

Economic Impacts of Adopting Non-Price Energy Consumption Policies

Musa Khoshkalam ^*

Alzahra university , musa_khosroshahi@yahoo.com

Abstract: (5930 Views)

Price policies are one of the most permissive policies in Iranian economic for controlling energy carrier's consumption. In addition, the non-price policies such as energy efficiency improvement are effective for controlling energy carrier's consumption. This paper assesses the economic impacts of energy efficiency improvement (in gasoline, gasoil and electric) as a non-price policy. For the purposes of this paper computable general equilibrium (CGE) model based on social accounting matrix (SAM) is used. The social accounting matrix is aggregated in 12 activities and 14 commodities. The CGE model blocks are: production block, institution block, trade block, Investment block and system constraint block. The results show that, first 10 percent improvement in energy efficiency makes the highest rebound effects (of gasoline) in the transport sector with 29.8 percent, the highest rebound effect (of gasoil) in the transport sector with 24.7% and the highest rebound effect (of electricity) in the other services sector with 24.5 percent. Second 10 percent improvement in energy efficiency causes the greatest increase in the output level of sectors (related to gasoline, gasoil and electricity) respectively, in the "transport", "transport" and "other services" by 0.62, 0.51 and 0.32 percent. Thirdly 10 percent improvement in energy efficiency increases the GDP respectively 0.17, 0.15 and 0.11 percent.

Keywords: Energy Carriers, Efficiency, CGE

Full-Text [PDF 4390 kb] (1601 Downloads)

Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: انرژی، منابع و محیط زیست
Received: 2017/05/9 | Accepted: 2018/11/26 | Published: 2017/12/16

References

1.  AlShehabi, O. (2013), Modelling energy and labour linkages: A CGE approach with an application to Iran, Economic Modelling, 35. [DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2013.06.047]

2.  Asgari, M. (2004), Applied General Equilibrium Model based on Social Accounting Matrix, Iranian Economic Research Center, Faculty of Economics Allameh Tabataba'i University

3.  Barker, T., Ekins, P. and Foxon, T. (2007), The macro-economic rebound effect and the UK economy, Energy Policy, 35, 4935-4946. [DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.04.009]

4.  Bhattacharyya, S. C. (1996), Applied General Equilibrium Models for Energy Studies: A Survey. Energy Economics 18: 145-164. [DOI:10.1016/0140-9883(96)00013-8]

5.  Devarajan, S. (1988), Lecture Notes on Computable General Equilibrium Models, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Mimeo, Processed.

6.  EIA, Energy Information Administration.

7.  Energy Balance Sheet (1393), Ministry of Energy.

8.  Freire, J. (2011), Methods to empirically estimate direct and indirect rebound effect of energy-saving technological changes in households, Ecological Modelling, 223, 32-40. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.09.001]

9.  Grepperud, S. and Rasmussen, I. (2004), A General Equilibrium Assessment of Rebound Effects, Energy Economics, 26, 261-282. [DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2003.11.003]

10.  Hanley, N,. McGregor, P., Swales, K. and Turner, K. (2009), Do Increases in Energy Efficiency Improve Environment Quality and Sustainability, Ecological Economics, 68, 692-709. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.004]

11.  Hertwich, E. (2005), Consumption and the Rebound Effect: An Industrial Ecology Perspective, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 9, No. 1-2. [DOI:10.1162/1088198054084635]

12.  https://www.jodidata.org/

13.  Jensen, J. and Tarr, D. (2002), Trade, Foreign Exchange, and Energy Policies in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Reform Agenda, Economic Implications, and Impact on the Poor, World Bank.

14.  Khoshkalam Khosroshahi, M., Jahangard, E. and Abedian, M. (2015), Improving the efficiency of gasoline consumption and its rebound effects in various economic activities, Quarterly of Energy Economics review, Vol. 10, No. 44, PP 37-63.

15.  Khiabani, N. (2008), A computable general equilibrium model for assessing the rise in the price of all energy carriers in Iran, Quarterly of Energy Economics Review, Vol. 10, No, 16, PP. 1-34.

16.  Kemfert, C. (1998), Estimated Substitution Elasticity's of a Nested CES Production Function Approach for Germany, Energy Economics, 20, 249-264. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-9883(97)00014-5]

17.  Lofgren, H., R. Harris, and Sh. Robinson (2001), A Standard Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model in GAMS, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.

18.  Lin, B., Li, J. (2014), The rebound effect for heavy industry: Empirical evidence from China, Energy Policy, 74(C), 589-599. [DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.031]

19.  Lu, Y., Liu, Y. and Zhou, M. (2016), Rebound Effect of Improved Energy Efficiency for Different Energy Types: A General Equilibrium Analysis for China, CAMA Working Paper 38/2016. [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2799474]

20.  Manzoor, D., Agababaie, E. and Hagigi, I. (2010), Analyzing the Rebound Effects Caused by Improving Electricity Efficiency in Iran: A Computable General Equilibrium Model, Quarterly of Energy Economics review, Vol. 8, No. 28, PP 1-23.

21.  National Accounts, Central bank of Iran.

22.  Thomas, B. and Azevedo, I. (2013), estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for U.S. households with input-output analysis. Part 2: Simulation, Ecological Economics, 86, 188-198. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.002]

23.  www.eia.gov/

24.  World Development Indicators, World Bank.