Mahdi Arab, Mohsen Zayanderoody, Abd-Al-Majid Jalaee,
Volume 15, Issue 55 (5-2024)
Abstract
Agbarakwe, U. H., & Okpe, E. A. (2024). An Analytical Inquiry into the Impact of International Trade on Poverty Reduction in Nigeria. South Asian Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 40-55.
Asongu, S. A., & Eita, J. H. (2023). The conditional influence of poverty, inequality, and severity of poverty on economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Applied Social Science, 17(3), 372-384.
Atrkar Roshan, S., & Hashemi, Z. (2016). The Impact of Trade Openness on Poverty in Iran: Simultaneous Equations System Method. Quarterly Journal of Applied Theories of Economics, 3(1), 183-204. (in Persian)
Balasubramanian, P., Burchi, F., & Malerba, D. (2023). Does economic growth reduce multidimensional poverty? Evidence from low-and middle-income countries. World Development, 161, 106119.
Cao, Y., Tabasam, A. H., Ahtsham Ali, S., Ashiq, A., Ramos-Meza, C. S., Jain, V., & Shahzad Shabbir, M. (2023). The dynamic role of sustainable development goals to eradicate the multidimensional poverty: evidence from emerging economy. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 36(3).
Chatziantoniou, I, Duffy. D, Filis, G. (2013). Stock Market Response to Monetary and Fiscal Policy Shocks: Multi-country evidence. Economic Modelling, 30, 454–769.
D’Attoma, I., & Matteucci, M. (2024). Multidimensional poverty: an analysis of definitions, measurement tools, applications and their evolution over time through a systematic review of the literature up to 2019. Quality & Quantity, 58(4), 3171-3213.
Deaton, A. (2005). Measuring poverty in a growing world (or measuring growth in a poor world). The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, 87(1), 1–19.
Hosseinidoust, S. E., Sepehrdoost, H., & Moradi, F. (2024). Investigating the Affecting Factors on Capability Poverty in the Selected Islamic Countries Emphasizing on Globalization and Economic Growth. Economic Growth and Development Research, 14(56), -. (in Persian)
Ilyas, A., Banaras, A., Javaid, Z., & Rahman, S. U. (2023). Effect of Foreign Direct Investment and Trade Openness on the Poverty Alleviation in Burundi–Sub African Country: ARDL (Co-integration) Approach. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(1), 555-565.
Imam, M. F., Islam, M. A., & Hossain, M. J. (2018). Factors affecting poverty in rural Bangladesh: an analysis using multilevel modelling. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University, 16(1), 123-130.
Iranmanesh, S. (2023). Analyzing the Role of Poverty in Financial Development in Selected Countries. Bi-quarterly Journal of development economics and planning, 10(1), 177-196. (in Persian)
Liu, M., Feng, X., Zhao, Y., & Qiu, H. (2023). Impact of poverty alleviation through relocation: From the perspectives of income and multidimensional poverty. Journal of Rural Studies, 99, 35-44.
Lundberg, L., & Squire, L. (2000). Inequality and growth; Lessons for policy. Mimeo, World Bank, Washington, D. C.
Mekonnen, A. G. (2024). Estimating multidimensional poverty: A new methodological approach. Journal of Poverty, 1-19
Motaghi, S., Gholami, R., Talei, S., & Ebrahimi, S. (2023). An Analysis of Regional Poverty and Factors Affecting it in Developed and Developing Countries. Journal of economics and regional development, 30(25), 39-66. (in Persian)
Nguyen, T. T., Hoang, V. N., Wilson, C., & Managi, S. (2019). Energy transition, poverty and inequality in Vietnam. Energy Policy, 132, 536-548.
Nurlina, N., Ridha, A., Syahputra, R., & Muda, I. (2024). Impact of selected macroeconomic on poverty alleviation in Indonesia: Evidence from NARDL approach. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(8), 5166.
Saddique, R., Zeng, W., Zhao, P., & Awan, A. (2023). Understanding multidimensional poverty in pakistan: implications for regional and demographic-specific policies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-16.
Shabanzadeh-Khoshrody, M., Javdan, E., & Shemshadi, K. (2024). Spatial Distribution of Poverty, Food Insecurity and Factors Affecting it in Urban Areas of Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, (), -. (in Persian)
Tasan, M., Piraee, K., Nonejad, M., & Abdoshahi, A. (2021). The Effect of Economic Openness on Improving the Life of the Poor in Iran. Agricultural Economics Research, 13(1), 123-146. (in Persian)
Yan, J., Işık, C., & Gu, X. (2024). The nexus between natural resource development, trade policy uncertainty, financial technology and poverty in China: Contributing to the realization of SDG 1. Resources Policy, 95, 105154.
, Ali Fegheh Majidid, Ali Fegheh Majidid,
Volume 15, Issue 57 (12-2025)
Abstract
Introduction
Poverty has become one of the major global challenges faced by most Asian countries. Although they have been able to achieve technology and increase productivity in the fields of production in recent decades, a high percentage of their society still lives in poverty. The current concern about the increase in chronic poverty in many countries of the developing world requires a deeper understanding not only of the number of poor people, but also of the nature of poverty. This issue has a widespread and devastating impact on the lives of millions of people around the world and is important because its effects go beyond the economic sphere and extend to the social, political and cultural spheres. Poverty reduction is one of the fundamental economic and social challenges in global societies. Therefore, it is very important to examine the factors affecting poverty reduction One of the ways to reduce poverty is the existence of institutional foundations and institutions. Since the second half of the twentieth century, numerous studies have been conducted on the role of institutional and political approaches in poverty reduction. According to these studies, the existence of strong institutions and institutions attracts investment, improves technology and employment, and consequently increases production and economic growth. Therefore, the existence of institutions is the main factor in the growth and development of countries. The existence of institutions and institutions can explain the differences in welfare, growth and development and economic well-being between countries. By creating a stable structure in the economy and society, institutions reduce risk and uncertainty, and thus reduce transaction costs. In short, understanding the interaction between institutional factors, spatial dynamics and poverty reduction is essential for designing effective policies and interventions. The aim of this study is to answer the question of how institutional factors and economic growth can reduce poverty in selected Asian countries?
Method
In this research, the research method is of the spatial analytical and econometric type. The data of this study were collected from the World Bank and the Macro Trends website. In estimating the spatial panel data model, it is necessary to mention a few points. First, the spatial effects in the calculations are factors that are related to the location of the variables. The first factor is the spatial dependence or autocorrelation between the observations of the sample data at different points and the second factor is the spatial structure or heterogeneity created by the model relations for moving on the plane. The coordinates change with the sample data. To detect the spatiality of the data, it is necessary to perform spatial detection tests. In this research, a weight matrix was formed for countries that have geographical connections. The weight matrix is of the adjacency type. The adjacency or neighborhood matrix was formed for the 15 countries studied. In this way, the value of one is considered for neighboring or neighboring countries and the value of zero for non-adjacent countries. Therefore, the adjacency matrix is a symmetric 15x15 matrix with a main diameter of zero and elements outside the main diameter of zero and one. Stata software is used to estimate the model. In panel data with spatial characteristics, fixed and random effects can be considered for the model and the best model was selected from SAR, SDM, SAC, SEM and GSPRE models using the spatial Hausman test, of which the spatial autocorrelation (SAC) model was selected.
Conclusion
Based on the spatial effect of the disturbance components or dependent variables, the results of the spatial autocorrelation model (SAC) show that economic growth and the quality of institutional factors have a positive effect on poverty reduction. Also, increasing domestic investment also helps to reduce poverty. The spatial effects of poverty show that increasing poverty in a country can also cause poverty in neighboring countries. In general, economic growth can increase welfare and create new opportunities. Policies that support economic growth, such as financial development and economic stability, provide a favorable environment for poor households to increase their production and income. The research results show that institutional development and better quality of institutions (such as corruption control, government stability and democracy) have a positive effect on poverty reduction. Better institutional quality improves resource distribution and poverty reduction in the long run. Strong and reliable institutions can increase investment attraction and facilitate international trade. It also confirms the positive effect of domestic investment on poverty reduction. Increased investment increases production, income and welfare and reduces unemployment. Spillover effects of domestic investment can facilitate the transfer of knowledge and technology.