The Analysis of Jalal Al-e-Ahmad’s Zan-e Ziadi Story Based on Jacques Derrida’s Deconstruction Theory

Nabiloo, Ali Rezā; Hāmoongard, Maryam

[Home ] [Archive]

[ فارسی ]

Half-Yearly Persian Language and Literature

دوفصلنامه زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه خوارزمی

Main Menu

Home

Journal Information

Articles archive

For Authors

For Reviewers

Registration

Contact us

Site Facilities

Publication statistics

Search in website

Receive site information

Publication Information

Publisher
Kharazmi University
Managing Director
Nasergholi Sarli
Editor-in-Chief
Habib-Allah Abbasi
Manager
Zahra Saberi
In charge of the Site
Tahereh sadate Mirahmadi

ISSN	2476-6925
EISSN	24766941

Indexing Databases

Social Networks

year 32, Issue 96 (4-2024)

Persian Language and Literature 2024, 32(96): 289-306

Back to browse issues page

The Analysis of Jalal Al-e-Ahmad’s Zan-e Ziadi Story Based on Jacques Derrida’s Deconstruction Theory

Ali Rezā Nabiloo

¹, Maryam Hāmoongard²

1- Qom University , a.nabiloo@qom.ac.ir
2- Qom University

Abstract: (16890 Views)

The story “Zan-e Ziadi” is one of the nine short stories in a collection of the same name, which was first published in 1952 during the lifetime of the contemporary writer, Jalal Al-e Ahmad. The central theme of all the stories in this collection is women, and the author has depicted their sorrows and problems from a critical perspective. This article examines “Zan-e Ziadi” from the perspective of deconstructive criticism. Deconstructive criticism, also known as deconstruction or constructionism, was developed based on the theory of the French philosopher and theorist Jacques Derrida (1930-2004). This term was first used in philosophy and then in literary criticism. The basis of deconstructive criticism is to find hidden binary and contradictions within the text, as by uncovering these binaries, one can discover the hidden layers within the text. According to Derrida, the internal binaries are hierarchical and stair-like, and one part is given superiority over the other, but upon close examination of the text, it becomes clear that none of the binaries have superiority over the other and are in fact complementary to each other. Deconstructive criticism is based on examining accepted assumptions, deconstructing, and revealing textual contradictions and the readers must search within the text for everything they need to know. The conflict in “Zan-e Ziadi” is superficially based on the contradiction between human and human, man/woman, and internally between human and false cultural and social beliefs and traditions. After examining the binaries within the text and identifying the conflicting forces within it, it becomes clear that contrary to what appears from the surface of the text and in the initial reading, the dominant pole in the text and the transcendental signified on which the internal challenge of the text is based is not an oppressive man against an oppressed woman, but rather both the man and the woman are captives and subjugated by false and imposed beliefs of their time, and the two binaries advance the story alongside harmoniously with each other.

Keywords: Deconstruction, Jacques Derrida, Jalal Al-e-Ahmad, Zan-e Ziadi

Full-Text [PDF 655 kb] (66 Downloads)

Type of Study: Research | Subject: نقد ادبی

References

1. آل‌احمد، جلال (1386) زن زیادی. چاپ دهم. تهران: فردوس.

2. آلیانی، فرشته؛ فاضلی، فیروز؛ هوشیار کلویر، بهار (1399). تحلیل انتقادی گفتمان غالب در داستان زن زیادی. زن و فرهنگ. شمارة 46: 103-116.

3. آهی، محمد؛ طاهری، محمد (1398). نقد و تحلیل نظریة ساخت‌شکنی دریدا در فهم متون. نقد و نظر. دورة بيست‌وچهارم. شمارة 94: 127-149.

4. احمدی، بابک (1378). ساختار و تأویل متن. تهران: مرکز.

5. افخمی‌نیا، مهدی؛ جواری، محمدحسین؛ وصال، متین (1389). تحلیل ادبی-جامعه‌شناختی زن زیادی جلال آل‌احمد برطبق الگوی لوسین گلدمن. پژوهش زبان و ادبیات فرانسه. شمارة 41: 20-85.

6. ایگلتون، تری (1368). پیش‌درآمدی بر نظریة ادبی. ترجمة عباس مخبر. تهران: مرکز.

7. برتنس، هانس (1383). مبانی نظری ادبی. ترجمة محمدرضا ابوالقاسمی. تهران: ماهی.

8. پاینده، حسین (1382). گفتمان نقد. تهران: نیلوفر.

9. تایسن، لوئیس (1392). نظریه‏های نقد ادبی معاصر. ترجمة مازیار حسین‌زاده و فاطمه حسینی. تهران: نگاه امروز و حکایت قلم نوین.

10. حاجی‌آقابابایی، محمدرضا (1397). تحلیل داستان زن زیادی بر اساس نظریة خوانندة درون‌متن چمبرز. نخستین همایش ملی تحقیقات ادبی با رویکرد مطالعات تطبیقی. تهران.

11. سلدن، رامان (1377). راهنمای نظریة ادبی معاصر. ترجمة عباس مخبر. چاپ سوم. تهران: طرح نو.

12. شمیسا، سیروس (1386). نقد ادبی. تهران: میترا.

13. کالر، جاناتان (1382). نظریة ادبی. ترجمة فرزانه طاهری. چاپ دوم. تهران: مرکز.

14. مکاریک، ایرنا ریما (1384). دانشنامة نظریه‌های ادبی معاصر. ترجمة مهران مهاجر و محمد نبوی. تهران: آگه.

15. Bressler, 2-E.C (2007). Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. 4th Edition. London: Prentice Hall.

16. Lane, J. Richard (2006) Fifty key literary Theorists. New York. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203441428]

17. Āl-Ahmad, Jalāl (2008). Zan-e Ziadi. 10th ed. Tehrān: Ferdows. [In Persian]

18. Āliyāni, Fereshteh; Fāzeli, Firouz; Houshyār kalvir, Bahār (2020). The Critical Analysis of Dominant Discourse Jalal Al-Ahmad's Zan-e-Ziadi Story. Woman and Culture, Number 46: 103-116. [In Persian]

19. Āhi, Mohammad; Tāheri, Mohammad (2019). A Critique and Analysis of Derrida's Deconstruction Theory of Understanding Texts, Naqd va Nazar, Number 94: 127-149. [In Persian]

20. Afkhami, Mahdi; Javāri, Mohammad Hossein; Vesāl, Matin (2019). Literary-Sociology Analysis of Jalal Al-Ahmad's Zan-e-Ziādi story According to Lucien Goldmann's Model. French Language and Literature Research, Number 41: 20-85 [In Persian]

21. Ahmadi, Bābak (1991). The Text-Structure and Textural Interpretation. Tehrān: Markaz [In Persian]

22. Bertens, Hans (2004). Literary Theory. Trans by Mohammad Rezā Abolghāsemi. Tehrān: Markaz [ In Pesian].

23. Caller, Jonathan (2004). Literary Theory. Trans by Fereshteh Tāheri, Tehrān: Markaz [In Persian]

24. Eagleton, Terry (1989). Literary Theory. Trans by Abbās Mokhber, Tehrān: Markaz [In Persian].

25. Hāji Āghābābāyi, Mohammad Rezā (2018). The Analysis of The Zan-e-Ziādi Story Based on Chambers' The Reader in The Book Theory. The First National Literary Research Conference [In Persian]

26. Makaryk. R. Irena (2005). Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theory. Trans by Mehrān Mohājer, Mohammad Nabavi. Tehrān: Āgāh. ]In Persian[.

27. Pāyandeh, Hossein (2004). A Reader's guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. Trans by Abbās Mokhber. Tehrān: Tarhe Now. [In Persian]

28. Selden, Raman (1990). A Reader's Guide to Contemperary Literary theory. Trans by Abbās Mokhber. 3rd ed. Tehrān: Tarh-e Now. [In Persian]

29. Shamisā, Sirous (2008). Literary Criticism. Tehrān: Mitrā [In Persian]

30. Tyson, Lois (2000) Critical Theory Today. Trans by Māziyār Hosseinzādeh and Fātemeh Hosseini. Tehrān: Negāh-e-Emrooz va Hekāyat-e Ghalam-e Novin [In Persian]

Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article

‎ 20.1001.1.24766925.1403.32.96.22.0

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Nabiloo A R, Hāmoongard M. The Analysis of Jalal Al-e-Ahmad’s Zan-e Ziadi Story Based on Jacques Derrida’s Deconstruction Theory. Persian Language and Literature 2024; 32 (96) :289-306
URL: http://jpll.khu.ac.ir/article-1-4282-en.html

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

year 32, Issue 96 (4-2024)

Back to browse issues page

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 44 queries by YEKTAWEB 4666