|
|
|
 |
Search published articles |
 |
|
Showing 2 results for khosravishakib
Mohammad Khosravishakib, Volume 18, Issue 68 (7-2010)
Abstract
Critics’ includingVimsat, Brooks, Pen Waren and Renewelek, in their evaluation of poems have focused on differentiating features of classical poetry and modern poetry.Compared with the North branch of literary criticism, the South branch of New criticism has explored the formalistic and structural features of poems. Brooks in his book entitled modern and classical poetry maintains that the formalistic nature of poem stems from an array of intricacies of the corresponding society. Further, he adds that critics should delve into literary works in order to capture the details. Brooks in juxtaposition with narrative system of classical poem tries to establish four categories of formalistic system including categorical, rhetorical, abstract, and associational in the modern poetry. Brooks assumes that non- narrative systems are more complex than narrative ones and sometimes they can be integrated. This results in more density and difficulty in poems. This article probes the possibility of criticizing the contemporary poetry of Persian literature accoding to non- narrative forms.
Hamed Dalvand, Mohammad Khosravishakib, Safiyeh Moradkhani, Rasul Heydari, Volume 33, Issue 98 (5-2025)
Abstract
The story of “Rostam and Shaghad” is one of the most technical and precise narratives in the Shahnameh. In this story, the most prominent hero, Rostam, is removed from the narrative flow. The interest and attachment to Rostam has caused Ferdowsi to show great sensitivity and obsession in removing him from the narrative path. In order to remove this national figure, Ferdowsi has had to spend a lot of linguistic and psychological precision in order to make his death with that greatness and invincibility appear reasonable. New criticism, as a concrete and systematic approach, attempts to show the verbal patterns, harmony, coherence, and internal connection of the components in a work by giving authenticity to the text.
The premise of the article is that Ferdowsi has tried to make the death of a hero like Rostam believable by using categories called “trust game” and “emotional deception”. Prepositions such as “charming”, “persuading”, “creating crisis and urgency”, “creating astonishment”, “transforming my story into ours”, “collusion”, “attracting trust”, “accelerating trust” and “conspiracy” make Rostam’s murder believable to a great extent. In this article, using the method of qualitative and precise description and analysis of the text, an attempt is made to evaluate Ferdowsi’s linguistic and psychological premises for the justification of the death of his great hero.
|
|
|
|
|
|