|
|
|
 |
Search published articles |
 |
|
Showing 2 results for sarli
Nasergholi Sarli, Akram Ghorbani Cheraghtappeh,
Volume 31, Issue 94 (6-2023)
Abstract
The researchers of mysticism and Islamic Sufism have considered the making of the language of Sufism and mystical discourse as one of the most important aspects of the history of Sufism. Especially the gradual differentiation of the language of Sufism from the language of religion and its transformation into an independent discourse has been the subject of valuable researches. The researchers have demonstrated that mystical experience and Qur'anic interpretation are inseparable at first and the language of mystical experience merely uses Quranic words, but gradually, mystical experience becomes independent and adopts the Qur'anic language/language of religion and acquires its very own language. One of the lexical features of the language of Qur'an/religion is the use of binary opposition. Binary oppositions such as Paradise/Hell, Good/Evil, this world/the Hereafter among the basic religious and Quranic teachings and are used with high frequency in Sufi texts. The use of binary oppositions in Sufi texts goes far beyond religious binary opposition, and especially in Sufi textbooks, many new terms are formed based on binary opposition.One of the distinguishing aspects of the language of Sufism is the deconstruction of binary oppositions. The deconstruction is applied both in the binary oppositions of religion and in the oppositions formed in the language of Sufism. It has various and different forms and aspects, and its analysis may provide us with the most creative and innovative aspects of Sufis' worldview and mystical experience. This linguistic invention, which is rooted in the novelty and uniqueness of mystical experience, is a sign of the authenticity of that experience. In this research, we have investigated the deconstruction and departure from binary opposition in a corpus including the most creative words of the Sufis in Persian prose texts. By analyzing and classifying the different forms of the deconstruction and going beyond the binary opposition, the article shows how this feature grants the language of Sufism a special artistic and poetic characteristic, and places it in a completely different level compared to religious texts and the language of Shariat. Going far beyond the binary oppositions is closely related to the paradoxical feature of the language of Sufism and provides the possibility of expressing more complex experiences for Sufis.
Shirin Roshani , Habibollah Abbasi, Dr. Nasergholi Sarli, Seyed Morteza Mirhashemi,
Volume 33, Issue 98 (5-2025)
Abstract
The historical event of the liberation of Bukhara is among those highly significant occurrences that have been recorded by numerous historians. The manner in which this event has been chronicled across different historical texts reflects the diversity of approaches and perspectives regarding historiography and the narration of events. In some of these texts, the accounts are presented in greater detail, to the point that the narrative transcends a mere historical report. One historian who recorded this event with an approach beyond simple reporting is Aṭa-Malik Juvayni, the author of Tarikh-i Jahangushay (The History of the World Conqueror). An analysis of Juvayni’s account reveals multiple factors that persuade the reader that he documented the events not solely for the purpose of reporting but from a broader outlook. In the present study, the event of the liberation of Bukhara was examined through a descriptive–analytical method and a narratological approach. The analysis is based on David Herman’s four-level narrative analysis theory, which examines narratives at the levels of happening, event sequencing, worldmaking/world disruption, and experientiality, thereby revealing the degree of narrativity within an event. At the first level of Juvayni’s narrative (happening), the narrator’s position can be identified in four distinct roles. In other words, Juvayni, by alternately assuming the roles of writer (reporter and reminder) and teller (reporter, moralizer), employs strategies that elevate the event beyond the confines of mere reporting to arrange a literary creation. At the second level (event sequencing), by skillfully arranging a beginning, middle, and end, Juvayni organizes the events into a causal structure, which presupposes a narrative plot. In shaping this narrative, Juvayni distinguishes between main and subsidiary events. This ordering of events, combined with precise depictions of time and place, illuminates Juvayni’s narrative method at the third level (worldmaking). Finally, at the fourth level, Juvayni induces a sense of experientiality in the reader through three techniques. It must be noted that such evocation is rarely perceived in historical texts. Yet, in their reports, Iranian historians often aim at purposes beyond mere chronicling, pursuing what can be termed the principle of instruction to influence their audience. At this level, by adopting three distinct techniques—an eloquent proemial description at the beginning of the narrative, the blending of discourse and image, and the incorporation of poetry and proverbs at the service of instruction—Juvayni affects the reader’s emotional system and transforms feeling into understanding. Ultimately, this process generates a central idea within the audience. This process results in the emergence of one of the essential elements of narrativity: the transition from the level of mere reporting to that of literary creation.
|
|
