---

Over the centuries, Persian literature has provided a calm platform for the formation and expression of Iranian ideas.The idea of pluralism or (Wus’at-iMashrab) is one of the beliefs, which peaked in the tenth to twelfth centuries A.H. at the same time as the Safavid rule in Iran and the Gurkhani Timurid rule in India and spread views such as free thinking, happiness, and esotericism.This thought grew with the migration of intellectuals to India in twobranches of Iran and India and was used in various and sometimes contradictory meanings, from rebellion and atheism to the end of spiritual perfection and purity.By explaining this view in poetic Tazkirahs, this study deals with the differences and distinctions in these two political regions and shows how the meanings of Wus’at-iMashrabin poetic Tazkirahsin Iran and India are influenced by the political and cultural atmosphere of these two regions.
 

---

Happiness as the goal and end of human life has been continuously considered throughout history. The concept of happiness as one of the basic human needs is understood and inferred in different ways. Most people consider happiness to be equal to pleasure, and some consider happiness to be the same as thoughtful life; In Sufism, happiness is the result of great spiritual expansion. The important point is that there is a common factor in all the definitions of happiness, and that is the feeling of satisfaction and contentment; Therefore, the feeling of mental comfort has a direct relationship with happiness. Jalaluddin Mohammad Mowlavi (604-672 A.H.) is one of the mystics whose words radiate joy. He considers Sufism as a way to receive the joy of the heart when sad factors come down, and he puts forward the components that lead a person to live happily ever after. Epicurus (341-270 B.C), the philosopher of the Hellenistic era of ancient Greece, who is known as the "philosopher of happiness", also presents a practical method that leads to happiness and happiness by considering sustainable pleasure as the ultimate human good. to be Now, the question is, what kind of pleasure is the pleasure of Epicurus, and does happiness from Epicurus' point of view and happiness from Mowlavi's point of view have common aspects or not?

Method: In this article, an attempt has been made to check whether there is a connection between Epicurean hedonism and hedonism from Mowlavi's point of view by means of library study and data comparison and analysis.

Findings and results: By carefully studying Epicurus' opinions and thoughts and his practical life, we can come to the conclusion that the pleasure from Epicurus' point of view is not only material and fleeting pleasures, but also like other moral theorists. The ancients expressed the goal as eudaimonia or happiness. The goal of his philosophy is to reach a stable state. In this way, man tries to achieve ataraxia by creating limits for his temporary and unstable pleasures. On the other hand, the practical philosophy of Epicurus expresses the components that have aspects in common with some views of Muslim mystics, including Mowlavi.