Volume 14, Issue 28 (12-2024)
JRSM 2024, 14(28): 75-96 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rakhsati Araqi M, Nasiri E, nasri S, Esmaili M R. Comparing The Effectiveness Of Student-Centered And Coach-Centered Coaching On Sport Self-Efficacy And Athletic Performance Of Girl Gymnasts. JRSM 2024; 14 (28) :75-96
URL: http://jrsm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3142-en.html
URL: http://jrsm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3142-en.html
1- Department of Movement Behavior and Sports Sciences, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Associate Professor of Growth and Development and Motor Learning, Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Humanities, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran. ,inasiri@shahed.ac.ir
3- Associate Professor of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran.
4- Department of Sports Management, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Associate Professor of Growth and Development and Motor Learning, Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Humanities, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran. ,
3- Associate Professor of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran.
4- Department of Sports Management, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (3460 Views)
In this study, the effectiveness of student-centered and coach-centered coaching styles on sport self-efficacy and athletic performance of female gymnasts was studied. The research method was quasi-experimental and a pre-test-post-test design was used. The statistical population was female gymnasts aged 11-14 in Tehran. The sampling method is one-stage clusters and the research sample is 40 female gymnasts who were selected based on Cochran's formula. Variable assessment tools included Sport Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (Sahraeian et al 2016) and a researcher-made sports performance questionnaire. After the pre-test, the groups performed the athlete-centered and coach-centered training protocol separately for two months and two days a week in one-and-a-half-hour sessions. Covariance analysis was used to test the hypotheses. Findings in the pre-test stage showed that sport self-efficacy and athletic performance of female gymnasts in the student-centered group were significantly higher than the coach-centered group (P <0.05). It is concluded that student-centered coaching style is more effective in increasing Gymnasts' sports self-efficacy and athletic performance compared to coach-centered, and coaches are suggested to pay special attention to student-centered exercises in the gymnastics girls' training program.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
motor behavior
Received: 2023/06/28 | Accepted: 2024/02/22 | ePublished ahead of print: 2024/02/22 | Published: 2024/12/30
Received: 2023/06/28 | Accepted: 2024/02/22 | ePublished ahead of print: 2024/02/22 | Published: 2024/12/30
References
1. Jõesaar H, Hein V, Hagger MS. Youth athletes' perception of autonomy support from the coach, peer motivational climate and intrinsic motivation in sport setting: One-year effects. Psychol Sport Exerc,2012; 13(3): 257-262 [DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.12.001]
2. Doğan O. Sport Pychology. Sivas: Cumhuriyet University Press; 2004
3. Weaver J, Moses JF, Snyder M. Self-Fulfilling Prophecies in Ability Settings. J Soc Psychol, 2016; 156(2): 179-189 DOI: 10.1080/00224545/215/1076761 [DOI:10.1080/00224545.2015.1076761]
4. Greif, S. Advances in research on coaching outcomes: International coaching psychology. Review: 2007:2(3): 222-249. [DOI:10.53841/bpsicpr.2007.2.3.222]
5. Ofoke Sunday Mbam; Nwankwo Chimezie; Oginyi Ronald.C. N; Ahamefule Kenneth. N: Roles of Coaching Styles, Motivation and Sports Behavior on Youth Athletes Sport Performance. Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Sports.2015, Vol.11:10-20
6. Chelladurai P. Leadership. In R. N. Singer, M. Murphy, & L. K. Tennant (Eds.): Handbook on Research on Sport Psychology (pp. 647-671). New York: McMillan; 1993
7. Bum CH, Shin SH: The Relationships between Coaches' Leadership Styles, Competitive State Anxiety, and Golf Performance in Korean Junior Golfers. Sport Science Review, 2015; 24(5-6): 371-386 DOI: 10.1515/ssr-2015-0024 [DOI:10.1515/ssr-2015-0024]
8. Eskiyecek CG, Bayazıt B, Sarı İ; The investigation in terms of age gender and sports of coach leadership behaviors preferred in athletes (the sample of Diyarbakır). International Refereed Academic Journal of Sports, Health and Medical Sciences, 2015; 5(15): 27-42 DOI: 10.17363/SSTB.2015159753 [DOI:10.17363/SSTB.2015159753]
9. Hollembeak J, Amorose AJ: Perceived coaching behaviors and college athletes' intrinsic motivation: A test of self-determination theory. J Appl Sport Psychol, 2005; 17(1): 20-36 DOI: 10.1080/10413200590907540 [DOI:10.1080/10413200590907540]
10. Reinboth M, Duda JL, Ntoumanis N. Dimensions of coaching behavior, need satisfaction, and the psychological and physical welfare of young athletes. Motiv Emot, 2004; 28(3): 297-313 DOI: 10.1023/B:MOEM.0000040156.81924.b8 [DOI:10.1023/B:MOEM.0000040156.81924.b8]
11. Wu AMS, Lai MHC, Chan IT. Coaching behaviors, satisfaction of needs, and intrinsic motivation among Chinese university athletes. J Appl Sport Psychol, 2014; 26(3): 334-348 DOI: 10.1080/10413200.2014.888107 [DOI:10.1080/10413200.2014.888107]
12. Nicholls AR, Morley D, Perry JL. Mentally tough athletes are more aware of unsupportive coaching behaviours: Perceptions of coach behaviour, motivational climate, and mental toughness in sport. Int J Sports Sci Coach, 2016; 11(2): 172-181 DOI: 10.1177/1747954116636714 [DOI:10.1177/1747954116636714]
13. Adie J W, Duda JL, Ntoumanis N. Autonomy support, basic need satisfaction and the optimal functioning of adult male and female sport participants: A test of basic needs theory. Motiv Emot, 2008; 32(3): 189-199 DOI: 10.1007/s11031-008-9095-z [DOI:10.1007/s11031-008-9095-z]
14. Cheval B, Chalabaev A, Quested E, Courvoisier DS, Sarrazin, P. How perceived autonomy support and controlling coach behaviors are related to well-and ill-being in elite soccer players: A within-person changes and between-person differences analysis. Psychol Sport Exerc, 2017; 28: 68-77 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.10.006 [DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.10.006]
15. Stebbings J, Taylor IM, Spray CM. Antecedents of Perceived Coach Autonomy Supportive and Controlling Behaviors: Coach Psychological Need Satisfaction and Well-Being, J Sport Exerc Psychol, 2011; 33(2):255-272 DOI: 10.1123/jsep.33.2.255 [DOI:10.1123/jsep.33.2.255]
16. Barcza-Renner K, Eklund RC, Morin AJ, Habeeb CM. Controlling coaching behaviors and athlete burnout: Investigating the mediating roles of perfectionism and motivation. J Sport Exerc Psychol, 2016; 38(1):30-44 DOI: 10.1123/jsep.2015-0059 [DOI:10.1123/jsep.2015-0059]
17. Ahlberg, M. Mallett, Clifford J., & Tinning, Richard: Developing autonomy supportive coaching behaviors: An action research approach to coach development. International Journal of Coaching Science.2008,2(2): July.
18. Bowles, R. & O'Dwyer, A: Athlete-centered coaching: Perspectives from the sideline. Sports Coaching Review2019 DOI: 10.1080/21640629.2019.1649901 [DOI:10.1080/21640629.2019.1649901]
19. Light.R: Positive pedagogy for sport coaching: Athlete-centered coaching for individual sports. Book:2016 DOI: 10.4324/9781315443720 [DOI:10.4324/9781315443720]
20. Dowdell, T: Characteristics of Effective Gymnastics Coaching. In Science of Gymnastics Journal:2011, 2(1):15-24 • February.
21. Körük E, Biçer T, Donuk B. Determination of the Amateur Soccer Coaches Lidership Styles and The Motivation Techniques They Use. Istanbul University Journal of Sport Sciences, 2003; 11(3): 53-57
22. Toros T. Analysis the differentiation between perceived coaching behaviors, goal orientation, team cohesion,perceived motivational climate ve collective efficacy among the young male basketball players before and after the tournament. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, 2011; 2(1): 27-39
23. Cengiz R, Aytan GK, Abakay U. The relationship between self-efficacy levels and leadership qualities that the taekwondo athlete perceive. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 2012; 7(4): 68-78
24. Matosic D, Cox AE, Amorose AJ. Scholarship status, controlling coaching behavior, and intrinsic motivation in collegiate swimmers: A test of cognitive evaluation theory. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 2014; 3(1): 1-12 DOI: 10.1037/a0031954 [DOI:10.1037/a0031954]
25. Ledochowski L, Unterrainer C, Ruedl G, Schnitzer M, Kopp M. Quality of life, coach behaviour and competitive anxiety in Winter Youth Olympic Games participants. Brit J Sport Med, 2012; (15): 1044-1047 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091539 [DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2012-091539]
26. Toros T, Duvan A. The relationship between perceived coaching behaviours, collective efficacy and goal orientation among fencer players in Turkey. Nigde University Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 2011; 5(1): 33-41
27. Reinboth M, Duda JL, Ntoumanis N. Dimensions of coaching behavior, need satisfaction, and the psychological and physical welfare of young athletes. Motiv Emot, 2004; 28(3): 297-313 DOI: 10.1023/B:MOEM.0000040156.81924.b8 [DOI:10.1023/B:MOEM.0000040156.81924.b8]
28. Vealey RS, Armstrong L, Comar W, Greenleaf CA. Influence of perceived coaching behaviors on burnout and competitive anxiety in female college athletes. J Appl Sports Psychol, 1998; 10(2): 297-318 DOI: 10.1080/10413209808406395 [DOI:10.1080/10413209808406395]
29. Horn, T: Coaching effectiveness in the sport domain. In T. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology, 2002(2nd ed., pp. 309-354). Champaign, IL. Human Kinetics.
30. Sullivan, P., Paquette, K., Holt, N., & Bloom, G: The relation of coaching context and coach education to coaching efficacy and perceived leadership behaviors in youth sport.Sport Psychologist,2012, 26 (1), 122-134 DOI: 10.1123/tsp.26.1.122 [DOI:10.1123/tsp.26.1.122]
31. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev, 1977; 84(2): 191-215 DOI: 10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191 [DOI:10.1037//0033-295X.84.2.191]
32. Gençtürk A, Memiş A. An Investigation of Primary School Teachers' Teacher Efficacy and Job Satisfaction in Terms of Demographic Factors. Elementary Education Online, 2010; 9(3): 1037-1054
33. Bandura A. Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall;1986
34. İhsan Sarı1, Betül Bayazıt. (The Relationship Between Perceived Coaching Behaviours, Motivation and Self-Efficacy in Wrestlers. Journal of Human Kinetics :2017, V.57: 239-251 DOI: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0065 [DOI:10.1515/hukin-2017-0065]
35. Figen PS, Mete S. Use of Adaptation Model and Social Cognitive Theory in Prenatal Education. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Elektronik Dergisi, 2009; 1(1): 57-68
36. Bandura A, Cervone D. Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1983; 45(5): 1017-1028 DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1017 [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1017]
37. Van Dinther M, Dochy F, Segers M. Factors affecting students' self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 2011; 6(2): 95-108 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003 [DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003]
38. Saville PD, Bray SR. Athletes' perceptions of coaching behavior, relation-inferred self-efficacy (rise), and self- efficacy in youth sport. J Appl Sport Psychol, 2016; 28(1): 1-13 DOI: 10.1080/10413200.2015.1052890 [DOI:10.1080/10413200.2015.1052890]
39. Sharrock, Chris, Cropper, Jarrod. Mostad, Joel. Johnson, Matt and Malone, Terry: A Pilot Study OF Core Stability and Athletic Performance: Is There a Relationship? Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2011 Jun; 6(2): 63-74.
40. Ramezani Nejad, Rahim; Hosseini Killing, Covenant; Muhaddith, Fatima: The Relationship between Coaching Styles and Group Cohesion and the Success of Student Volleyball Teams, Sports Management, 2010: Fall, No. 6. [in Persian]
41. Ghasemi, Mohammad Hadi; Amirtash, Ali Mohammad, Kamkari, Kambiz: The Relationship between Leadership Trust and Sports Performance in a Selection of Championship Sports (Gymnastics, Diving and Wushu), Two Quarterly Journal of Research in Sports Management, Motor Behavior:2013, 11(6): [in Persian]
42. Chiri, Laura: The effect of coaching behaviors on self-efficacy, cohesion and team performance in the players of the Iranian Women's Football Premier League,PhD Thesis, Razi University - Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences,2017[in Persian]
43. Dana, Amir, Sabzi, Amir Hamzeh, Gozelzadeh, Elmira: Structural relationships between coaching efficiency, player self-efficacy and collective efficiency in professional women's basketball teams. Journal of Sports Psychology Studies,2016: No. 81., Winter 2016, pp. 128-111[Persian]
44. Hemmatinejad, Mehr Ali; Shafiee Kurdsholi, Shahram; Hajiabadi, Mehdi: The relationship between the leadership style of coaches and the sports identity of Iranian Handball Premier League players. Journal of Physiology and Management Research in Sport,2015: Volume 8, Number 3 Fall 2016 Page 79-92[in Persian]
45. Haj Anzaei, Zahra; Tandnavis, Fereydoun: The relationship between coaching behavior and motivation for success and team performance of the players of the National Handball Premier League. Journal of Research in Sports Management and Motor Behavior,2013: Fall and Winter 2013 No. 6, 121-111[in Persian]
46. Arazi, Hamid; Rahmati, Siavash; Pahlavanzadeh, Maryam: The effect of a quasi-competitive specialized training session on hematological indices of members of the Iranian national aerobic gymnastics team. Journal of Applied Studies in Life Sciences in Sport.2013: 1(1): [in Persian]
47. Sahraeian, Iman, VaezMousavi, Mohammad and Khabiri , Mohammad: Development of a Sport Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. Sport Psychology Studies,2016, N 16:55-70[in Persian]
48. Zemikael Getu Yemiru:The Effect of Coach Leadership Style on Athletes Performance of Athletics Club of Addis Ababa. International Journal of Sports Science & Medicine. 2020,4(1):22-25
49. Chee, H. K. Rasyid, N. M. Tengah, R. Y. Low J. F. L.: Relation between Leadership Style and Performance of Perak Sukma Athletes and Coaches. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences.2017,9(6S):1323-1333 [DOI:10.4314/jfas.v9i6s.97]
50. Katarii U. DonaldStephen R. Marvin, Aarek W. Farmer and Karen Cypress:The Association Between High School Coach's Leadership Behaviors and Athletes' Self-Efficacy and Grit.2019,v22
51. Marcone, Mike: The Impact of Coaching Styles on the Motivation and Performance of Athletes A Synthesis Project Presented to the Department of Kinesiology, Sport Studies, and Physical Education. The College at Brockport State University of New York,2017
52. Kidman, L and Davis, W : Empowerment in Coaching, In Davis,W, Broadhead, G Ecological Task Analysis Perspectives on Movement, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. 2007 DOI: 10.5040/9781492595434.ch-006 [DOI:10.5040/9781492595434.ch-006]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
