دوره 14، شماره 28 - ( 10-1403 )
جلد 14 شماره 28 صفحات 74-52 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
nojan G, mohamadzadeh H, dehghanizadeh J. Comparison The Effect Of Traditional And Sport-Education Methods On Metacognition And Meta-Emotion Of Tennis-Skills. JRSM 2024; 14 (28) :52-74
URL: http://jrsm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3225-fa.html
URL: http://jrsm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3225-fa.html
نوژن غزال، محمدزاده حسن، دهقانی زاده جلال. مقایسه اثر روشهای آموزش ورزش و سنتی بر فراشناخت و فراهیجان در مهارتهای تنیس. پژوهش در مدیریت ورزشی و رفتار حرکتی. 1403; 14 (28) :52-74
1- دکتری رفتار حرکتی، گروه رفتار حرکتی و مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران
2- استاد گروه رفتار حرکتی و مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران. ،h.mohammadzadeh@urmia.ac.ir
3- دانشیار گروه رفتار حرکتی و مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران.
2- استاد گروه رفتار حرکتی و مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران. ،
3- دانشیار گروه رفتار حرکتی و مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران.
چکیده: (3214 مشاهده)
در سالهای اخیر تلاشهای زیادی برای ابداع روشهای جدید آموزش مهارتهای ورزشی صورت‌گرفته که علاوه بر آموزش تکنیک و تاکتیک بازی، شناخت و هیجان فراگیران را بیشتر به چالش می‌کشد. هدف پژوهش حاضر مقایسه روشهای آموزش ورزش و سنتی بر فراشناخت و فراهیجان در مهارتهای تنیس بود. پژوهش حاضر نیمه تجربی با طرح پیش‌آزمون - پس‌آزمون بود. آزمودنیها شامل 24 دختر نوجوان شهر ارومیه (سن: 36/1±54/16سال) بودند که به صورت غیر تصادفی به دو گروه آموزش ورزش و سنتی تقسیم شدند. تمرینات شامل 14 جلسه به مدت 4 هفته (3 جلسه در هفته) بود. ابزار پژوهش پرسش‌نامه فراشناخت ولز و پرسش‌نامه فراهیجان میتمانسگروبر بود. نتایج نشان داد که بین دو گروه آموزش ورزش و سنتی در افزایش میزان فراشناخت (004/0=p)، فراهیجان مثبت (007/0=p) و فراهیجان منفی (015/0=p) تفاوت معناداری وجود دارد. در گروه آموزش ورزش، به طور معنی‌داری، فراشناخت (001/0=p) و فراهیجان مثبت (001/0=p) افزایش یافتند و فرا هیجان منفی (001/0=p) بهبود یافت، اما تغییرات این شاخصها در گروه آموزش سنتی معنی‌دار نبود (05/0<P). در نتیجه، توصیه می‌شود افراد مبتدی با اجرای فعالیت ورزشی به روش آموزش ورزش علاوه بر فواید جسمانی از مزیتهای بهبود دانش فراشناختی و ارتقا فراهیجانی این نوع روش تمرینی بهره‌مند شوند.
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي |
موضوع مقاله:
رفتار حرکتی
دریافت: 1402/3/11 | پذیرش: 1402/11/10 | انتشار الکترونیک پیش از انتشار نهایی: 1402/11/10 | انتشار: 1403/10/10
دریافت: 1402/3/11 | پذیرش: 1402/11/10 | انتشار الکترونیک پیش از انتشار نهایی: 1402/11/10 | انتشار: 1403/10/10
فهرست منابع
1. Burgueño R, Medina-Casaubón J, Morales-Ortiz E, Cueto-Martin B, Sánchez-Gallardo I. Sport education versus traditional teaching: influence on motivational regulation in high school students. Cuadernos de Psicologia Del Deporte. 2017;17(2):87-97. [DOI:10.3390/su13020578]
2. Burgueño R, Medina-Casaubón J. Sport Education and sportsmanship orientations: An intervention in high school students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(3):837. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph17030837]
3. Álvarez-Bueno C, Pesce C, Cavero-Redondo I, Sánchez-López M, Pardo-Guijarro MJ, Martínez-Vizcaíno V. Association of physical activity with cognition, metacognition and academic performance in children and adolescents: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open. 2016;6(6):e011065. [DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011065]
4. Chu TL, Zhang T. Motivational processes in Sport Education programs among high school students: A systematic review. European Physical Education Review. 2018;24(3):372-94. [DOI:10.1177/1356336X17751231]
5. Siedentop D. Sport education: Quality PE through positive sport experiences: Human Kinetics Publishers; 1994. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/19941807606
6. Mitmansgruber H, Beck TN, Höfer S, Schüßler G. When you don't like what you feel: Experiential avoidance, mindfulness and meta-emotion in emotion regulation. Personality and Individual Differences. 2009;46(4):448-53. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2008.11.013]
7. Burgueño R, Cueto-Martín B, Morales-Ortiz E, Silva PC, Medina-Casaubón J. Clarifying the influence of sport education on basic psychological need satisfaction in high school students. Motricidade. 2018;14(2-3):48-58. [DOI:10.6063/motricidade.13318]
8. Gil-Arias A, Diloy-Peña S, Sevil-Serrano J, García-González L, Abós Á. A hybrid tgfu/se volleyball teaching unit for enhancing motivation in physical education: A mixed-method approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(1):110. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph18010110]
9. Harvey S, Pill S, Hastie P, Wallhead T. Physical education teachers' perceptions of the successes, constraints, and possibilities associated with implementing the sport education model. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2020;25(5):555-66. [DOI:10.1080/17408989.2020.1752650]
10. Hastie PA, Wallhead T. Models-based practice in physical education: The case for sport education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2016;35(4):390-9. [DOI:10.1123/jtpe.2016-0092]
11. Manninen M, Campbell S. The effect of the Sport Education Model on basic needs, intrinsic motivation and prosocial attitudes: A systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis. European Physical Education Review. 2022;28(1):78-99. [DOI:10.1177/1356336X211017938]
12. Wallhead TL, Garn AC, Vidoni C. Effect of a sport education program on motivation for physical education and leisure-time physical activity. Research quarterly for exercise sport 2014;85(4):478-87. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.2014.961051]
13. Wallhead TL, Ntoumanis N. Effects of a sport education intervention on students' motivational responses in physical education. Journal of teaching in physical education 2004;23(1):4-18. [DOI:10.1123/jtpe.23.1.4]
14. Evangelio C, Sierra-Díaz J, González-Víllora S, Fernández-Río J. The sport education model in elementary and secondary education: A systematic review. Movimento. 2018;24(3):931-46. [DOI:10.22456/1982-8918.81689]
15. Araújo R, Mesquita I, Hastie PA. Review of the status of learning in research on sport education: Future research and practice. Journal of sports science medicine. 2014;13(4):846. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25435778/
16. Nikravan M, Safania AM, Zaree A. Comparing the Effectiveness of Traditional Methods and Sport Education on Knowledge and Enthusiasm on Volleyball. Sport Psychology Studies. 2019;8(28):43-50. [DOI:10.22089/spsyj.2018.4976.1519]
17. Davoodi M, Yaali R, Ghadiri F, Bahram A. The Effect Of Teaching Game For Understanding, Sport Education, The Combination (Teaching Game For Understanding+ Sport Education) And Linear Training On Children's Creativity In Futsal. Development & Motor Learning. 2021;13(45):293-312. [in persian] [DOI:10.22059/jmlm.2021.327830.1598]
18. Roodsarabi T, Keshtidar M, Khamesan A, S.Afzalpor M. Effects of Sport Education Model on Self- Determination of physical education syllabus female students Research on Educational Sport. 2013;1(2):59. [in persian] https://civilica.com/doc/793052
19. Siedentop D. Sport education: A retrospective. Journal of teaching in physical education. 2001;21(4):409-18.
https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.21.4.409 [DOI:doi/full/10.5555/20023108682]
20. Gil-Arias A, Claver F, Práxedes A, Villar FD, Harvey S. Autonomy support, motivational climate, enjoyment and perceived competence in physical education: Impact of a hybrid teaching games for understanding/sport education unit. European Physical Education Review. 2020;26(1):36-53. [DOI:10.1177/1356336X18816997]
21. Gil-Arias A, Harvey S, Cárceles A, Práxedes A, Del Villar F. Impact of a hybrid TGfU-Sport Education unit on student motivation in physical education. PloS one. 2017;12(6):e0179876. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0179876]
22. Gil-Arias A, Harvey S, García-Herreros F, González-Víllora S, Práxedes A, Moreno A. Effect of a hybrid teaching games for understanding/sport education unit on elementary students' self-determined motivation in physical education. European Physical Education Review. 2021;27(2):366-83. [DOI:10.1177/1356336X20950174]
23. Flavell JH. Cognitive development: Children's knowledge about the mind. Annual review of psychology. 1999;50(1):21-45. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.21]
24. Shirinzadeh Dastgiri S, Goodarzi M, Rahimi Ch NQ. Investigating factor structure, validity and validity of meta-cognitive questionnaire-30. J Psychol. 2008;4(48):445-61. [in persian] [DOI:10.22070/CPAP.2020.2901]
25. Manninen M, Campbell S. The effect of the Sport Education Model on basic needs, intrinsic motivation and prosocial attitudes: A systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis. European Physical Education Review. 2021:1356336X211017938. [DOI:10.1177/1356336X211017938]
26. Hassandra M, Goudas M, Chroni S. Examining factors associated with intrinsic motivation in physical education: a qualitative approach. Psychology of sport and exercise. 2003;4(3):211-23. [DOI:10.1016/S1469-0292(02)00006-7]
27. Lachat Shakeshaft Y, Lecerf T, Morosan L, Badoud DM, Debbané M. Validation of the French version of the «Meta-Cognition Questionnaire» for adolescents (MCQ-Af): Evolution of metacognitive beliefs with age and their links with anxiety during adolescence. Plos one. 2020;15(3):e0230171. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0230171]
28. Wells A, Cartwright-Hatton S. A short form of the metacognitions questionnaire: properties of the MCQ-30. Behaviour research and therapy. 2004;42(4):385-96. [DOI:10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00147-5]
29. Mayer J. D., Salovey P. "What is emotional intelligence?," in Emotional Development and Emotional Intelligence: Educational Implications, eds Salovey P., Sluyter D. J. (New York, NY: Harper Collins;). 1997. 3-34. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-08644-000
30. Rezaei N, Parsai A, Najati A, Hashemi Erzini S. Psychometric properties of students' Farahijan scale. Quarterly Journal of Psychological. 2014:111-24. [in persian] https://www.sid.ir/paper/504516/fa
31. Sun Z. The advantage of using sport education instead traditional approach in physical education. Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2016;6(2):13-6. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jrme/papers/Vol-6%20Issue-2/Version-3/B0602031316.pdf
32. Hastie PA, Trost SG. Student physical activity levels during a season of sport education. Pediatric exercise science. 2002;14(1):64-74. [DOI:10.1123/pes.14.1.64]
33. Garcia Lopez LM, Kirk D. Empowering children from socially vulnerable backgrounds through the use of roles in sport education. Sport, Education and Society. 2021:1-13. [DOI:10.1080/13573322.2021.1897563]
34. Fernandez-Rio J, Méndez-Giménez A, Méndez Alonso D. Efects of two instructional approaches, sport education and direct instruction, on secondary education students' psychological response. 2017. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6101996
35. Cuevas R, García-López LM, Serra-Olivares J. Sport education model and self-determination theory: An intervention in secondary school children. Kinesiology. 2016;48(1.):30-8. [DOI:10.26582/k.48.1.15]
36. Hastie PA, Curtner-Smith MD. Influence of a hybrid Sport Education-Teaching Games for Understanding unit on one teacher and his students. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy. 2006;11(01):1-27. [DOI:10.1080/17408980500466813]
37. Mitchell S, Mitchell SA, Oslin J, Griffin LL. Teaching sport concepts and skills: A tactical games approach: Human Kinetics Publishers; 2020. https://www.amazon.com/Teaching-Sport-Concepts-Skills-Tactical/dp/1450411223
38. Evangelio C, Sierra Díaz J, González Víllora S, Fernández Río FJ. The sport education model in elementary and secondary education: A systematic review. Movimento, 24. 2018. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8906051 [DOI:10.22456/1982-8918.81689]
39. Guijarro E, MacPhail A, González-Víllora S, Arias-Palencia NM. Relationship between personal and social responsibility and the roles undertaken in Sport Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2020;40(1):76-85. [DOI:10.1123/jtpe.2019-0097]
40. Hastie PA, de Ojeda DM, Luquin AC. A review of research on Sport Education: 2004 to the present. Physical education and sport pedagogy. 2011;16(2):103-32. [DOI:10.1080/17408989.2010.535202]
41. Araújo R, Mesquita I, Hastie PA. Review of the status of learning in research on sport education: Future research and practice. Journal of sports science & medicine. 2014;13(4):846. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4234955/
42. Luna P, Guerrero J, Cejudo J. Improving adolescents' subjective well-being, trait emotional intelligence and social anxiety through a programme based on the sport education model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;16(10):1821. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph16101821]
43. Tendinha R, Alves MD, Freitas T, Appleton G, Gonçalves L, Ihle A, et al. Impact of sports education model in physical education on students' motivation: a systematic review. Children. 2021;8(7):588.
https://doi.org/10.3390/children8070588 [DOI:10.3390/children8070588.]
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 | این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
