Volume 14, Issue 27 (8-2024)
JRSM 2024, 14(27): 66-85 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
ghadimi kalateh Z, Shahbazi M, qeysari S F. The Effect of Self-Regulation And Bandwidth Feedback Through Self-Modeling Strategies On Learning of The Volleyball Tennis Service. JRSM 2024; 14 (27) :66-85
URL: http://jrsm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2735-en.html
URL: http://jrsm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2735-en.html
1- M.a, University of mazandaran
2- Associate Professor, University of tehran ,shahbazimehdi@ut.ac.ir
3- M.a, University of tehran
2- Associate Professor, University of tehran ,
3- M.a, University of tehran
Abstract: (5117 Views)
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of self-control feedback with bandwidth feedback through self-modeling strategies on volleyball service in novice and intermediate learners. For this purpose, two groups of novice and intermediate learners took part in this experiment. Each group practiced volleyball tennis skills in six sessions in two sub-groups of self-control and bandwidth feedback methods through self-modeling strategies. The design involved a pretest, acquisition sessions post-test, retention test and a transfers test. In each session, the self-control feedback sub-group was matched to the number of feedbacks received by bandwidth feedback subgroup; but the self-regulation feedback subgroup has a self-controlled role in when they receive feedback.The results showed that both methods of providing feedback in both groups improved the performance level of the subjects in the post-test, retention test and transfer test significantly (p<0.05). AlsoThe results showed that the beginners benefited from self-regulation feedback more than bandwidth feedback (p<0.05), while the intermediate benefited equally from self-regulation and bandwidth feedback (p>0.05).It seems that the self-control benefits can also be generalized in self-modeling. Therefore, the use of self-control effect in self-modeling feedback in volleyball tennis service training is suggested to coaches and sports teachers in the beginner and skilled groups.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
motor behavior
Received: 2023/06/29 | Accepted: 2024/02/22 | ePublished ahead of print: 2024/02/22 | Published: 2024/08/31
Received: 2023/06/29 | Accepted: 2024/02/22 | ePublished ahead of print: 2024/02/22 | Published: 2024/08/31
References
1. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought andaction. New York: pretice-hall. 1986. doi:10 record/1985-98423-000
2. Kampiotis S, Theodorakou K. The influence of five different types of observation based teaching on the cognitive level of learning. Kinesiology: International journal of fundamental and applied kinesiology. 2007;38(2):116-25 https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/13857
3. Schunk DH, Hanson AR. Self-modeling and children's cognitive skill learning. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1989;81(2):155. doi: 10.3389/fpthjog.1989.00556 [DOI:10.1037//0022-0663.81.2.155]
4. Clark SE, Ste-Marie DM. The impact of self-as-a-model interventions on children's self-regulation of learning and swimming performance. Journal of sports sciences. 2007;25(5):577-86. [DOI:10.1080/02640410600947090]
5. Dowrick PW, Dove C. THE USE OF SELF‐MODELING TO IMPROVE THE SWIMMING PERFORMANCE OF SPINA BIFIDA CHILDREN. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1980;13(1):51-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-51 [DOI:10.1901/jaba.1980.13-51]
6. Starek J, McCullagh P. The effect of self-modeling on the performance of beginning swimmers. The Sport Psychologist. 1999;13(3):269-87. DOI: [DOI:10.1123/tsp.13.3.269]
7. Martini R, Rymal A, Ste-Marie DM. Investigating self-as-a-model techniques and underlying cognitive processes in adults learning the butterfly swim stroke. Int J Sport Sci Eng. 2011;5:242-56.doi: 10.29252/JRSM.10.19.105 [DOI:10.29252/JRSM.10.19.105]
8. Ste-Marie DM, Rymal A, Vertes K, Martini R. Self-modeling and competitive beam performance enhancement examined within a self-regulation perspective. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2011;23(3):292-307. [DOI:10.1080/10413200.2011.558049]
9. Ste-Marie DM, Vertes KA, Law B, Rymal AM. Learner-controlled self-observation is advantageous for motor skill acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology. 2013;3:556. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00556 [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00556]
10. Zetou E, Kourtesis T, Getsiou K, Michalopoulou M, Kioumourtzoglou E. The effect of self-modeling on skill learning and self-efficacy of novice female beach-volleyball players. Athletic Insight: The Online Journal of Sport Psychology. 2008;10(3). http://www. thleticinsight.com/Vol10Iss3/SelfModeling.htm
11. Salmoni AW, Schmidt RA, Walter CB. Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. Psychological bulletin. 1984;95(3):355. [DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.355]
12. Cauraugh JH, Chen D, Radio SJ. Effects of traditional and reversed bandwidth knowledge of results on motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 1993;64(4):413-7. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1993.10607594 [DOI:10.1080/02701367.1993.10607594]
13. Smith PJ, Taylor SJ, Withers K. Applying bandwidth feedback scheduling to a golf shot. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 1997;68(3):215-21. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1997.10608000 [DOI:10.1080/02701367.1997.10608000]
14. Goodwin JE, Meeuwsen HJ. Using bandwidth knowledge of results to alter relative frequencies during motor skill acquisition. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 1995;66(2):99-104. DOI:10.1080/02701367.1995.10762217 [DOI:10.1080/02701367.1995.10762217]
15. Badets A, Blandin Y. Observational learning: Effects of bandwidth knowledge of results. Journal of Motor Behavior. 2005;37(3):211-6. https://doi. rg/10.3200/JMBR.37.3.211-216 [DOI:10.3200/JMBR.37.3.211-216]
16. Schiffman JM, Luchies CW, Piscitelle L, Hasselquist L, Gregorczyk KN. Discrete bandwidth visual feedback increases structure of output as compared to continuous visual feedback in isometric force control tasks. Clinical Biomechanics. 2006;21(10):1042-50. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.05.009]
17. Bjork RA, Dunlosky J, Kornell N. Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual review of psychology. 2013;64:417-44. [DOI:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823]
18. Chen D, Hendrick J, Lidor R. Enhancing self-controlled learning environments: the use of self-regulated feedback information. Journal of Human Movement Studies. 2002;43(1):69. DOI: 10.1080/ghao.01367.2012.10599822
19. Ste-Marie DM, Vertes K, Rymal AM, Martini R. Feedforward self-modeling enhances skill acquisition in children learning trampoline skills. Frontiers in psychology. 2011;2. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00155 [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00155]
20. Wulf G. Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning: implications for physiotherapy. Physiotherapy. 2007;93(2):96-101. [DOI:10.1016/j.physio.2006.08.005]
21. Bund A. Self-controlled learning of the forehand topspin stroke in table tennis. 2003. https://hdl.handle.net/10993/15316
22. Chiricowsky S, Wulf G. Self-control feedback: does it enhance learning because performance get feedback when need it? Res Q exerc Sport. 2002;73(4):408-15. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2002.10609040 [DOI:10.1080/02701367.2002.10609040]
23. Wulf G, Toole T. Physical assistance devices in complex motor skill learning: Benefits of a self-controlled practice schedule. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 1999;70(3):265-72. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1999.10608045 [DOI:10.1080/02701367.1999.10608045]
24. Janelle CM, Kim J, Singer RN. Subject-Controlled Performance Feedback and Learning of a Closed Motor Skill 1. Perceptual and motor skills. 1995;81(2):627-34. DOI: 10.1177/003151259508100253 [DOI:10.1177/003151259508100253]
25. Marques PG, Corrêa UC. The effect of learner's control of self-observation strategies on learning of front crawl. Acta psychologica. 2016;164:151-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.01.006]
26. Andrieux M, Danna J, Thon B. Self-control of task difficulty during training enhances motor learning of a complex coincidence-anticipation task. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 2012;83(1):27-35. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2012.10599822 [DOI:10.1080/02701367.2012.10599822]
27. Bund A, Wiemeyer J. Self-controlled learning of a complex motor skill: Effects of the learner's preferences on performance and self-efficacy. Journal of Human Movement Studies. 2004;47:215-36. https://hdl.handle.net/10993/4850
28. Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G. Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 2005;76(1):42-8. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2005.10599260 [DOI:10.1080/02701367.2005.10599260]
29. Wu WF, Magill RA. Allowing learners to choose: self-controlled practice schedules for learning multiple movement patterns. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 2011;82(3):449-57. DOI:10.5641/027013611X13275191443784 [DOI:10.5641/027013611X13275191443784]
30. Ezrati Gilan Amir, Hirani Ali, Khazaei Ali Ashraf, Abbaszadeh Ali. The effect of self-regulation and domain feedback methods on learning and the ability to identify errors in shooting skills. Research in sports biology [Internet]. 1390;1(3):51-62. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/240527/fa. 20.1001.1.24763187.2019.8.1.3.3
31. Suzande pour, R., Movahedi, A. R., Mazaheri, L., & Sharifi, G. (2009). The Comparison of the Effect of Two Methods of Self-Modelling and Video Demonstration of an Expert on the Acquisition and Retention of Volleyball Serve Skill. Journal of Sports and Motor Development and Learning, 1(1), 61-77. https://jsmdl.ut.ac.ir/article_22043.html?lang=en
32. Alipour, Ahmed, and Aghahar Haris, Mozhgan. (1). Investigating the reliability and validity of the Edinburgh Hand Excellence Questionnaire in Iran. Virtual, 1(1), 117-133. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/451151/fa [DOI:10.22054/jem.2017.19621.1495]
33. Wulf G, Lewthwaite RJPB, Review. Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. 2016;23(5):1382-414. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9 [DOI:10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9]
34. Ntoumanis N, Quested E, Reeve J, Cheon SH. Need supportive communication: Implications for motivation in sport, exercise, and physical activity. Persuasion and communication in sport, exercise, and physical activity Abingdon, UK: Routledge. 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/63158 [DOI:10.4324/9781315624365-10]
35. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry. 2000;11(4):227-68. [DOI:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01]
36. Bartholomew KJ, Ntoumanis N, The gersen-Ntoumani C. A review of controlling motivational strategies from a self-determination theory perspective: Implications for sports coaches. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2009;2(2):215-33. [DOI:10.1080/17509840903235330]
37. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology. 2000;25(1):54-67. [DOI:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020]
38. Schmidt RA. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological review. 1975;82(4):225. [DOI:10.1037/h0076770]
39. Wulf G, Raupach M, Pfeiffer F. Self-controlled observational practice enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2005;76(1):107-11. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2005.10599266 [DOI:10.1080/02701367.2005.10599266]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
