دوره 10، شماره 4 - ( 10-1402 )
جلد 10 شماره 4 صفحات 40-19 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ramezani Mehrian M. Systematic review of flood resilience assessment approaches and methods in urban environments. Journal of Spatial Analysis Environmental Hazards 2023; 10 (4) :19-40
URL: http://jsaeh.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3413-fa.html
URL: http://jsaeh.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3413-fa.html
رمضانی مهریان مجید. مرور نظام‌مند رویکردها و روش های ارزیابی تاب آوری سیل در محیط‌های شهری. تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی. 1402; 10 (4) :19-40
سازمان سمت ، mehrian@samt.ac.ir
چکیده: (1904 مشاهده)
رشد جمعیت و شهرسازی دو عامل اولیه در افزایش خطر سیل در مناطق شهری به شمار می‌روند. هم‌زمان با گسترش روز‌افزون شهرنشینی در بسیاری از شهرها تغییرات کاربری زمین منجر به افزایش حجم روانابهای سطحی و تغییر رژیم‌های سیلابی رودخانهها شده است. از این رو سیل شهری یکی از مخاطراتی است که به‌طور مستقیم و غیر‌مستقیم آثار زیان‌بار خود را بر شهرهای مختلف ایران وارد ساخته است. از آنجا که تاب‌آوری با ترکیب مؤلفههای مختلف درک جامعی از شرایط فراهم میسازد میتواند در ایجاد ابزارهای مدیریت ریسک سیل شهری مثمر ثمر باشد. برای اینکه بتوان از مفهوم تاب‌آوری به‌طور مؤثر در فرایند تصمیم‌گیری و مدیریت سیلاب‌های شهری استفاده کرد، لازم است تاب‌آوری شهر در برابر مخاطره سیل موردسنجش و ارزیابی قرار گیرد. با وجود این، سنجش تاب‌آوری در محیط‌های شهری در برابر سیل به‌دلیل عدم شفافیت لازم در زمینه رویکردهای روش‌شناختی با چالش جدی مواجه است. بر این اساس در این مطالعه با مرور نظام‌مند و فراتحلیل مطالعات انجام شده در زمینه ارزیابی تاب‌آوری محیط‌های شهری در برابر سیل رویکردها و روش‌‌ها در این زمینه مورد واکاوی قرار گرفته است. مطابق یافته‌های تحقیق روش‌های ارزیابی تاب‌آوری محیط‌های شهری در برابر سیل، به سه دسته کمی، نیمه‌کمی و کیفی تقسیم میشوند. روش‌های کیفی از تنوع کمتری نسبت به روش‌های کمی برخوردارند و غالباً شامل روش مصاحبه‌گیری و چارچوب‌های مفهومی نظری میشوند. غالب روش‌های ارزیابی در این زمینه روش‌های کمی و نیمه‌کمی هستند که می‌توان آن‌ها را در دو دسته پرکاربرد یعنی روش‌های مبتنی بر شبیه‌سازی و روش‌های مبتنی بر شاخص‌سازی جای داد. در رویکرد مبتنی بر شبیه‌سازی به‌طورکلی از مدلسازی هیدرولوژیکی و شبیه‌سازی سیلاب استفاده می‌شود. روش‌های مبتنی بر شاخص‌سازی در شکل‌های متفاوت توسعهیافتهاند اما به‌طورکلی از اصول یکسانی پیروی میکنند و می‌توان از آن‌ها برای تحلیل تاب‌آوری دیگر انواع مخاطرات در عرصههای جغرافیایی نیز استفاده کرد.
فهرست منابع
1. Abdrabo, M., & Hassaan, M. A. 2015. An integrated framework for urban resilience to climate change–Case study: Sea level rise impacts on the Nile Delta coastal urban areas. Urban Climate, 14: 554-565.
2. Alexander, D. E. 2013. Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey. Natural Hazards & Earth System Sciences, 13(11).
3. Allen, T. R., Crawford, T., Montz, B., Whitehead, J., Lovelace, S., Hanks, A. D., . . . Kearney, G. D. 2019. Linking water infrastructure, public health, and sea level rise: Integrated assessment of flood resilience in coastal cities. Public Works Management & Policy, 24(1): 110-139.
4. Bates, B., Kundzewicz, Z., Wu, S., & Palutikof, J. 2008. Climate change and water technical paper of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (Geneva: IPCC Secretariat). Climate Change, 95, 96.
5. Batica, J., & Gourbesville, P. 2016. Resilience in flood risk management–a new communication tool. Procedia engineering, 154: 811-817.
6. Bertilsson, L., Wiklund, K., de Moura Tebaldi, I., Rezende, O. M., Veról, A. P., & Miguez, M. G. 2019. Urban flood resilience–A multi-criteria index to integrate flood resilience into urban planning. Journal of hydrology, 573: 970-982.
7. Birgani, Y. T., & Yazdandoost, F. 2016. Resilience in urban drainage risk management systems. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Management.
8. Birkland, T. A., & Waterman, S. 2016. The politics and policy challenges of disaster resilience. In Resilience Engineering Perspectives, 2 (37-60): CRC Press.
9. Burton, C. G. 2015. A validation of metrics for community resilience to natural hazards and disasters using the recovery from Hurricane Katrina as a case study. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(1): 67-86.
10. Cai, H., Lam, N. S., Qiang, Y., Zou, L., Correll, R. M., & Mihunov, V. 2018. A synthesis of disaster resilience measurement methods and indices. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 31: 844-855.
11. Campbell, K. A., Laurien, F., Czajkowski, J., Keating, A., Hochrainer-Stigler, S., & Montgomery, M. 2019. First insights from the Flood Resilience Measurement Tool: A large-scale community flood resilience analysis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 40: 101257.
12. Cariolet, J.-M., Vuillet, M., & Diab, Y. 2019. Mapping urban resilience to disasters–A review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 51: 101746.
13. Chen, J., Chen, W., & Huang, G. 2021. Assessing urban pluvial flood resilience based on a novel grid-based quantification method that considers human risk perceptions. Journal of hydrology, 601:126601.
14. Cutter, S. L. 2016. The landscape of disaster resilience indicators in the USA. Natural hazards, 80(2): 741-758.
15. Cutter, S. L., Ahearn, J. A., Amadei, B., Crawford, P., Eide, E. A., Galloway, G. E., . . . Schoch-Spana, M. 2013. Disaster resilience: A national imperative. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 55(2): 25-29.
16. Cutter, S. L., Ash, K. D., & Emrich, C. T. 2014. The geographies of community disaster resilience. Global Environmental Change, 29: 65-77.
17. Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., & Webb, J. 2008. A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18(4): 598-606.
18. Cutter, S. L., Burton, C. G., & Emrich, C. T. 2010. Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions. Journal of homeland security and emergency management, 7(1).
19. de Boer, J., Muggah, R., & Patel, R. 2016. Conceptualizing city fragility and resilience.
20. Fisher, L. 2015. More than 70 ways to show resilience. Nature, 518(7537): 35-35.
21. Folke, C. 2006. Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3): 253-267.
22. Foster, K. A. 2012. In search of regional resilience. Urban and regional policy and its effects: Building resilient regions, 4: 24-59.
23. Fox-Lent, C., Bates, M. E., & Linkov, I. 2015. A matrix approach to community resilience assessment: an illustrative case at Rockaway Peninsula. Environment Systems and Decisions, 35(2): 209-218.
24. Gaitan, S., & van de Giesen, N. 2015. Spatial distribution of flood incidents along urban overland flow-paths. Water Resources Management, 29(9): 3387-3399.
25. Holling, C. S. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual review of ecology and systematics, 4(1): 1-23.
26. Huang, G., Shen, Z., & Mardin, R. 2019. Overview of urban planning and water-related disaster management. In Urban Planning and Water-related Disaster Management, 1-10: Springer.
27. Karamouz, M., & Zahmatkesh, Z. 2017. Quantifying resilience and uncertainty in coastal flooding events: Framework for assessing urban vulnerability. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 143(1): 04016071.
28. Keating, A., Campbell, K., Szoenyi, M., McQuistan, C., Nash, D., & Burer, M. 2017. Development and testing of a community flood resilience measurement tool. Natural hazards and earth system sciences, 17(1): 77-101.
29. Kotzee, I., & Reyers, B. 2016. Piloting a social-ecological index for measuring flood resilience: A composite index approach. Ecological Indicators, 60: 45-53.
30. Kwok, A. H., Paton, D., Becker, J., Hudson-Doyle, E. E., & Johnston, D. 2018. A bottom-up approach to developing a neighbourhood-based resilience measurement framework. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal.
31. Landau, B. (2016). Résilience, vulnérabilité des territoires et génie urbain: Ponts et Chaussées.
32. Leandro, J., Chen, K.-F., Wood, R. R., & Ludwig, R. 2020. A scalable flood-resilience-index for measuring climate change adaptation: Munich city. Water Research, 173: 115502.
33. Lhomme, S., Serre, D., Diab, Y., & Laganier, R. (2013). Analyzing resilience of urban networks: a preliminary step towards more flood resilient cities. Natural hazards and earth system sciences, 13(2): 221-230.
34. Liao, K.-H. 2012. A theory on urban resilience to floods—a basis for alternative planning practices. Ecology and society, 17(4).
35. Linkov, I., Bridges, T., Creutzig, F., Decker, J., Fox-Lent, C., Kröger, W., . . . Nathwani, J. 2014. Changing the resilience paradigm. Nature Climate Change, 4(6): 407-409.
36. Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. 2016. Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147: 38-49.
37. Miguez, M. G., & Veról, A. P. 2017. A catchment scale Integrated Flood Resilience Index to support decision making in urban flood control design. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 44(5): 925-946.
38. Mills, G., Cleugh, H., Emmanuel, R., Endlicher, W., Erell, E., McGranahan, G., . . . Steemer, K. 2010. Climate information for improved planning and management of mega cities (needs perspective). Procedia Environmental Sciences, 1: 228-246.
39. Moghadas, M., Asadzadeh, A., Vafeidis, A., Fekete, A., & Kötter, T. 2019. A multi-criteria approach for assessing urban flood resilience in Tehran, Iran. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 35: 101069.
40. Mugume, S. N., Gomez, D. E., Fu, G., Farmani, R., & Butler, D. 2015. A global analysis approach for investigating structural resilience in urban drainage systems. Water Research, 81: 15-26.
41. Parsons, M., Glavac, S., Hastings, P., Marshall, G., McGregor, J., McNeill, J., . . . Stayner, R. 2016. Top-down assessment of disaster resilience: A conceptual framework using coping and adaptive capacities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 19: 1-11.
42. Peacock, W. G., Brody, S. D., Seitz, W. A., Merrell, W. J., Vedlitz, A., Zahran, S., . . . Stickney, R. 2010. Advancing resilience of coastal localities: Developing, implementing, and sustaining the use of coastal resilience indicators: A final report. Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center, 1-148.
43. Pfefferbaum, B., Pfefferbaum, R. L., & Van Horn, R. L. 2015. Community resilience interventions: Participatory, assessment-based, action-oriented processes. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(2): 238-253.
44. Qiao, H., & Pei, J. 2021. Urban Stormwater Resilience Assessment Method Based on Cloud Model and TOPSIS. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1): 38.
45. Restemeyer, B., Woltjer, J., & van den Brink, M. 2015. A strategy-based framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities–A Hamburg case study. Planning Theory & Practice, 16(1): 45-62.
46. Rezende, O. 2018. Quantitative analysis of flood resilience for urban planning: case of the canal do Mangue in-Rio de Janeiro. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
47. Rezende, O. M., Cruz de Franco, A. B. R. d., Oliveira, A. K. B. d., Jacob, A. C. P., & Miguez, M. G. 2018. A Framework to Assess Urban Floods Resilience. Paper presented at the International Conference on Urban Drainage Modelling.
48. Rezende, O. M., Miranda, F. M., Haddad, A. N., & Miguez, M. G. 2019. A framework to evaluate urban flood resilience of design alternatives for flood defence considering future adverse scenarios. Water, 11(7): 1485.
49. Russo, B., Velasco, M., Locatelli, L., Sunyer, D., Yubero, D., Monjo, R., . . . Evans, B. 2020. Assessment of urban flood resilience in barcelona for current and future Scenarios. The RESCCUE project. Sustainability, 12(14): 5638.
50. Serre, D., & Heinzlef, C. 2018. Assessing and mapping urban resilience to floods with respect to cascading effects through critical infrastructure networks. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 30:235-243.
51. Sudradjat, A., Nastiti, A., Barlian, K., & Angga, M. S. 2020. Flood and Drought Resilience Measurement at Andir Urban Village, Indonesia. Paper presented at the E3S Web of Conferences.
52. Szewranski, S., Swiader, M., Kazak, J. K., Tokarczyk-Dorociak, K., & van Hoof, J. 2018. Socio-Environmental Vulnerability Mapping for Environmental and Flood Resilience Assessment: The Case of Ageing and Poverty in the City of Wrocaw, Poland. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 14(5): 592-597. doi:10.1002/ieam.4077
53. Tayyab, M., Zhang, J., Hussain, M., Ullah, S., Liu, X., Khan, S. N., . . . Al-Shaibah, B. 2021. GIS-Based Urban Flood Resilience Assessment Using Urban Flood Resilience Model: A Case Study of Peshawar City, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Remote Sensing, 13(10): 1864.
54. Timmermann, P. 1981. Vulnerability, resilience and the collapse of society. Environmental Monograph, 1: 1-42.
55. UNISDR, C. 2015. The human cost of natural disasters: A global perspective.
56. Waghwala, R. K., & Agnihotri, P. 2019. Flood risk assessment and resilience strategies for flood risk management: A case study of Surat City. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 40: 101155.
57. Wang, P., Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. 2021. An urban system perspective on urban flood resilience using SEM: evidence from Nanjing city, China. Natural hazards, 109(3): 2575-2599.
58. Wang, Y., Meng, F., Liu, H., Zhang, C., & Fu, G. 2019. Assessing catchment scale flood resilience of urban areas using a grid cell based metric. Water Research, 163: 114852.
59. Weir, M., Pindus, N., Wial, H., & Wolman, H. 2012. Urban and regional policy and its effects: building resilient regions (Vol. 4): Brookings Institution Press.
60. Wong, T. H., & Brown, R. R. 2009. The water sensitive city: principles for practice. Water Science and Technology, 60(3): 673-682.
61. Xu, W., Cong, J., Proverbs, D., & Zhang, L. 2021. An Evaluation of Urban Resilience to Flooding. Water, 13(15): 2022.
62. Xu, W., Xiang, L., & Proverbs, D. 2020. Assessing community resilience to urban flooding in multiple types of the transient population in China. Water, 12(10): 2784.
63. Zhang, H., Yang, J., Li, L., Shen, D., Wei, G., & Dong, S. 2021. Measuring the resilience to floods: A comparative analysis of key flood control cities in China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 59: 102248.
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 | این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
