Volume 14, Issue 53 (12-2025)
serd 2025, 14(53): 0-0 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sarfi H. Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union and Its Consequences on the Spatial-economic Development of Rural Areas. serd 2025; 14 (53)
URL: http://serd.khu.ac.ir/article-1-4048-en.html
URL: http://serd.khu.ac.ir/article-1-4048-en.html
Regional studies with a focus on Europe, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. , hamid.sarfi@ut.ac.ir
Abstract: (38 Views)
Objective: To investigate the consequences of the common agricultural policy of the European Union on the spatial-economic development of rural areas since 1962, with the aim of a deeper understanding of its effects on the economic, social, and spatial structure of these areas.
Methods: This study was conducted with a qualitative approach and document analysis method. The theoretical framework of the research is based on the theory of integrated spatial development with a focus on the approach of sustainable agricultural and rural development, which seeks to balance the economic, social, and environmental dimensions of rural development.
Results: Numerous reforms in the common agricultural policy have created significant changes in agricultural spatial patterns, the economic structure of villages, and population distribution. This policy has played an important role in the spatial-economic reorganization of rural areas, but challenges such as regional inequalities and rural migration still remain. On the one hand, it has helped to improve agricultural productivity, protect the environment, and strengthen infrastructure, but on the other hand, the unequal distribution of subsidies and excessive focus on production in some areas have exacerbated regional inequalities.
Conclusions: This research emphasizes the necessity of adopting an integrated and balanced approach in rural development policy-making. Challenges such as climate change and global competition have increased the need to review this policy. Greater attention to innovation, digitization of agriculture, and strengthening of local value chains is necessary to increase the economic resilience of rural areas. The Common Agricultural Policy, despite its significant achievements, needs continuous reforms to adapt to changing circumstances.
Methods: This study was conducted with a qualitative approach and document analysis method. The theoretical framework of the research is based on the theory of integrated spatial development with a focus on the approach of sustainable agricultural and rural development, which seeks to balance the economic, social, and environmental dimensions of rural development.
Results: Numerous reforms in the common agricultural policy have created significant changes in agricultural spatial patterns, the economic structure of villages, and population distribution. This policy has played an important role in the spatial-economic reorganization of rural areas, but challenges such as regional inequalities and rural migration still remain. On the one hand, it has helped to improve agricultural productivity, protect the environment, and strengthen infrastructure, but on the other hand, the unequal distribution of subsidies and excessive focus on production in some areas have exacerbated regional inequalities.
Conclusions: This research emphasizes the necessity of adopting an integrated and balanced approach in rural development policy-making. Challenges such as climate change and global competition have increased the need to review this policy. Greater attention to innovation, digitization of agriculture, and strengthening of local value chains is necessary to increase the economic resilience of rural areas. The Common Agricultural Policy, despite its significant achievements, needs continuous reforms to adapt to changing circumstances.
Keywords: European Union, Spatial Rearrangement, Sustainable Development, Common Agricultural Policy, Spatial-Economic Development, Rural Areas.
References
1. Alons, G. (2019). Environmental policy integration in the EU’s common agricultural policy: greening or greenwashing? In Transforming Food and Agricultural Policy (pp. 40-58). Routledge.
2. Bartolini, F., & Brunori, G. (2014). Understanding linkages between the common agricultural policy and High Nature Value (HNV) farmland provision: an empirical analysis in the Tuscany Region. Agricultural and Food Economics, 2, 1-21.
3. Bertoni, D., Aletti, G., Ferrandi, G., Micheletti, A., Cavicchioli, D., & Pretolani, R. (2018). Farmland use transitions after the CAP greening: a preliminary analysis using a Markov chain approach. Land Use Policy, 79, 789-800.
4. Bonfiglio, A., Camaioni, B., Coderoni, S., Esposti, R., Pagliacci, F., & Sotte, F. (2017). Are rural regions prioritizing knowledge transfer and innovation? Evidence from Rural Development Policy expenditure across the EU space. Journal of Rural Studies, 53, 78-87.
5. Bosworth, G., Price, L., Hakulinen, V., & Marango, S. (2020). Rural social innovation and neo-endogenous rural development. Neoendogenous Development in European Rural Areas: Results and Lessons, 21-32.
6. Burton, R. J., & Fischer, H. (2015). The Succession Crisis in European Agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis, 55(2), 155-166.
7. Ciliberti, S., & Frascarelli, A. (2018). The CAP 2013 reform of direct payments: redistributive effects and impacts on farm income concentration in Italy. Agricultural and Food Economics, 6(1), 19.
8. Cimino, O., Henke, R., & Vanni, F. (2015). The effects of CAP greening on specialised arable farms in Italy. New Medit, 14(2), 22-31.
9. Crescenzi, R., & Giua, M. (2020). One or many Cohesion Policies of the European :union:? On the differential economic impacts of Cohesion Policy across member states. Regional Studies, 54(1), 10-20.
10. Dax, T., & Copus, A. (2018). Towards vibrant, inclusive and sustainable rural regions: Orientations for a future rural cohesion policy. European Structural & Investment Funds Journal, 6(3), 198-209.
11. Dax, T., & Fischer, M. (2018). An alternative policy approach to rural development in regions facing population decline. European planning studies, 26(2), 297-315.
12. Erjavec, E., & Lovec, M. (2017). Research of the European :union:'s Common Agricultural Policy: disciplinary boundaries and beyond. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 44(4), 732-754.
13. Erjavec, K., & Erjavec, E. (2015). Greening the CAP–Just a fashionable justification? A discourse analysis of the 2014–2020 CAP reform documents. Food Policy, 51, 53-62.
14. Gocht, A., Ciaian, P., Bielza, M., Terres, J. M., Röder, N., Himics, M., & Salputra, G. (2017). EU‐wide economic and environmental impacts of CAP greening with high spatial and farm‐type detail. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(3), 651-681.
15. Grando, S., Bartolini, F., Bonjean, I., Brunori, G., Mathijs, E., Prosperi, P., & Vergamini, D. (2020). Small farms' behaviour: Conditions, strategies and performances. In Innovation for sustainability: Small farmers facing new challenges in the evolving food systems (pp. 125-169). Emerald Publishing Limited.
16. Greer, A. (2017). Post-exceptional politics in agriculture: an examination of the 2013 CAP reform. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(11), 1585-1603.
17. Guiomar, N., Godinho, S., Pinto-Correia, T., Almeida, M., Bartolini, F., Bezak, P., Biro, M., Bjørkhaug, H., Bojnec, Š., & Brunori, G. (2018). Typology and distribution of small farms in Europe: Towards a better picture. Land Use Policy, 75, 784-798.
18. Kiryluk-Dryjska, E., & Baer-Nawrocka, A. (2019). Reforms of the Common Agricultural Policy of the EU: Expected results and their social acceptance. Journal of Policy Modeling, 41(4), 607-622.
19. Latruffe, L., Diazabakana, A., Bockstaller, C., Desjeux, Y., Finn, J., Kelly, E., Ryan, M., & Uthes, S. (2016). Measurement of sustainability in agriculture: a review of indicators. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 118(3), 123-130.
20. antino, F., & Vanni, F. (2018). The role of localized agri-food systems in the provision of environmental and social benefits in peripheral areas: Evidence from two case studies in Italy. Agriculture, 8(8), 120.
21. Matthews, A. (2018). The CAP in the 2021–2027 MFF Negotiations. Intereconomics, 53(6), 306-311.
22. Matthews, A. (2020). The new CAP must be linked more closely to the UN Sustainable Development Goals. In (Vol. 8, pp. 1-4), Springer.
23. Maucorps, A., Münch, A., Brkanovic, S., Schuh, B., Dwyer, J. C., Vigani, M., Khafagy, A., Coto Sauras, M., Deschellette, P., & Lopez, A. (2019). The EU farming employment: current challenges and future prospects.
24. Maye, D., Kirwan, J., & Brunori, G.(2019). Ethics and responsibilisation in agri-food governance: the single-use plastics debate and strategies to introduce reusable coffee cups in UK retail chains. Agriculture and human values, 36, 301-312.
25. Navarro, A., & López-Bao, J. V. (2018). Towards a greener common agricultural policy. Nature ecology & evolution, 2(12), 1830-1833.
26. Olper, A., Raimondi, V., Cavicchioli, D., & Vigani, M. (2014). Do CAP payments reduce farm labour migration? A panel data analysis across EU regions. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 41(5), 843-873.
27. Pe'Er, G., Zinngrebe, Y., Moreira, F., Sirami, C., Schindler, S., Müller, R., Bontzorlos, V., Clough, D., Bezák, P., & Bonn, A. (2019). A greener path for the EU Common Agricultural Policy. Science, 365(6452), 449-451.
28. Petrick, M., & Zier, P. (2012). Common Agricultural Policy effects on dynamic labour use in agriculture. Food policy, 37(6), 671-678.
29. Podruzsik, S., & Fertő, I. (2024). Motivations for farmers’ participation in agri-environmental schemes in the EU: literature review. Open Agriculture, 9(1), 20220379.
30. Recanati, F., Maughan, C., Pedrotti, M., Dembska, K., & Antonelli, M. (2019). Assessing the role of CAP for more sustainable and healthier food systems in Europe: A literature review. Science of the Total Environment, 653, 908-919.
31. Ribašauskienė, E., Šumylė, D., Volkov, A., Baležentis, T., Streimikiene, D., & Morkunas, M. (2019). Evaluating public policy support for agricultural cooperatives. Sustainability, 11(14), 3769.
32. Rizov, M., Pokrivcak, J., & Ciaian, P. (2013). CAP subsidies and productivity of the EU farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(3), 537-557.
33. Rounsevell, M. D., Metzger, M. J., & Walz, A. (2019). Operationalising ecosystem services in Europe. In (Vol. 19, pp. 2143-2149), Springer.
34. Scown, M. W., & Nicholas, K. A. (2020). European agricultural policy requires a stronger performance framework to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Global Sustainability, 3, e11.
35. Shucksmith, M., & Brown, D. L. (2016). Routledge international handbook of rural studies. Routledge London.
36. Terres, J.-M., Scacchiafichi, L. N., Wania, A., Ambar, M., Anguiano, E., Buckwell, A., Coppola, A., Gocht, A., Källström, H. N., & Pointereau, P. (2015). Farmland abandonment in Europe: Identification of drivers and indicators, and development of a composite indicator of risk. Land Use Policy, 49, 20-34.
37. Viaggi, D. (2018). The bioeconomy: delivering sustainable green growth. CABI.
38. Vigani, M., & Dwyer, J. (2020). Profitability and efficiency of high nature value marginal farming in England. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71(2), 439-464.
39. Wuepper, D., Wimmer, S., & Sauer, J. (2020). Is small family farming more environmentally sustainable? Evidence from a spatial regression discontinuity design in Germany. Land Use Policy, 90, 104360.
40. Zasada, I., Weltin, M., Reutter, M., Verburg, P. H., & Piorr, A. (2018). EU’s rural development policy at the regional level—Are expenditures for natural capital linked with territorial needs? Land Use Policy, 77, 344-353.
41. Zhu, X., & Lansink, A. O. (2010). Impact of CAP subsidies on technical efficiency of crop farms in Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(3), 545-564.
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
