<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>SPACE ECONOMY &amp; RURAL DEVELOPMENT</title>
<title_fa>اقتصاد فضا و توسعه روستایی</title_fa>
<short_title>serd</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://serd.khu.ac.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2322-2131</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2588-476X</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.66224/serd</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>4444</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>fa</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1394</year>
	<month>6</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2015</year>
	<month>9</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>4</volume>
<number>12</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>fa</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa>بررسی وضعیت شاخص های کیفیت زندگی در مراکز دهستان‌های شهرستان جیرفت</title_fa>
	<title>Assessment of Factors Affecting Quality of Life in Centers of Rural Districts, Jiroft County</title>
	<subject_fa></subject_fa>
	<subject></subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;رشد سریع جمعیت، فقر گسترده، نابرابری&amp;shy;های فزآینده، بیکاری، مهاجرت، حاشیه&amp;shy;نشینی و غیره، همگی از پیامدهای کم توجهی به مقوله کیفیت زندگی در نواحی روستایی است. برای رسیدن به توسعه&amp;shy;ی پایدار، توجه به توسعه روستایی و افزایش سطح کیفیت زندگی روستاییان ضرورتی اجتناب&amp;shy;ناپذیر است. تحقیق حاضر با هدف وضعیت&amp;shy;&amp;shy;شناسی شاخص&amp;shy;های کیفیت زندگی در مراکز دهستان&amp;shy;های شهرستان جیرفت صورت گرفته است. تعداد خانوارهای مراکز دهستان&#8204;های مورد مطالعه 4243 خانوار بوده که با استفاده از جدول نمونه&amp;shy; گیری کرجسی و مورگان 350 نفر از آنها به عنوان نمونه تعیین و به&amp;shy;شیوه&amp;shy;ی طبقه&amp;shy;ای با انتساب متناسب انتخاب شده است. ابزار جمع&amp;shy;آوری داده&amp;shy;ها پرسشنامه&amp;shy; بوده است. روایی ابزار تحقیق از طریق روایی صوری تأیید گردید و برای بررسی پایایی پرسشنامه، مطالعه&amp;shy;ی پیش&amp;shy;آزمون انجام گرفت که نتایج آماره&amp;shy;ی آلفای کرونباخ برای شاخص&amp;shy;های مختلف از (71/0 تا 89/0) محاسبه گردید. تجزیه و تحلیل داده&amp;shy;ها با استفاده از نرم افزار SPSS20 انجام گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که شاخص امنیت اجتماعی در رتبه اول و شاخص درآمد در رتبه آخر قرار دارد. مقایسه و تفکیک دهستان&amp;shy;های مورد مطالعه نشان داد از لحاظ میانگین شاخص پایگاه اجتماعی، در بین روستاهای مورد مطالعه تفاوت وجود ندارد؛ از حیث میانگین شاخص سرانه&amp;shy;ی پوشاک روستاها در دو طبقه و از لحاظ میانگین شاخص&amp;shy;های امنیت اجتماعی، مسکن، دارایی&amp;shy;ها، درآمد، سرانه&amp;shy;ی تغذیه و رضایتمندی در چهار طبقه قابل تفکیک هستند.&lt;/div&gt;
</abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle0&quot;&gt;Introduction&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle1&quot;&gt;The concept of quality of life has been emerged in theoretical literature and press in&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;early 1960s, it has turned to be one of the interested issues in social science and in&amp;nbsp;recent years, it has been a base for modern differentiation and classification of&amp;nbsp;countries. Improving quality of life in a special place or for special people or groups is&amp;nbsp;always the focusing concern to plan makers. Improving quality of life could be followed&amp;nbsp;by other dimensions of development such as social, economic and physical ones. In this&amp;nbsp;way, rural areas need some studies related to quality of life. These studies should&amp;nbsp;include related aspects to quality of life in the village, reduction of geographical&amp;nbsp;exclusion and accessibility to basic needs of life. Moreover, the results of studies on&amp;nbsp;quality of life could be helpful in assessment of policies, ranking the locations,&amp;nbsp;codification of management strategies and urban and rural planning which can facilitate&amp;nbsp;understanding and prioritization of socio-economic issues for plan makers and&amp;nbsp;managers to improve people&amp;#39;s quality of life. Considering that urban growth and&amp;nbsp;urbanization are the most obvious social, economic changes in recent times,&amp;nbsp;urbanization rapidly spread so that this phenomenon has limited most of the&amp;nbsp;opportunities which can improve quality of life for the villages. However, in many rural&amp;nbsp;areas in Iran, despite of different changes in case of improving quality of life, we are&amp;nbsp;still far from the ideal situation. This condition is more obvious in the areas that most of&amp;nbsp;the population lives in the villages; Jiroft County located in Kerman Province is an&amp;nbsp;example. Therefore, this study aims to assess factors affecting quality of life in villages&amp;nbsp;located in Jiroft.&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle0&quot;&gt;Methodology&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle1&quot;&gt;According to its aim, this study is a practical one and regarding its data collection&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;method, it is a survey which uses questionnaires as the tool of data collection; The face&amp;nbsp;validity is confirmed by faculty members in Yasouj University and Shiraz University;&amp;nbsp;to examine its validity, Pilot study is conducted as the pre-test outside the study&amp;nbsp;population, on the residents in Ali-Abad village, Jiroft; Calculation of Cronbach&amp;#39;s alfa&amp;nbsp;for different factors (from 0.71 to 0.89) is estimated that suggests the reliability of this&amp;nbsp;assessment tool. In this study, the unit of analysis includes the householder.&amp;nbsp;Furthermore, according to government census, the population was 4243 households&amp;nbsp;among them 350 households have been chosen using Krejcie &amp; Morgan random&amp;nbsp;sampling table as the population of this study; samples have been chosen according to&amp;nbsp;each village population and geographical region according to the classes. Data analysis&amp;nbsp;was performed using SPSS.&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle2&quot;&gt;Discussion and Conclusion&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle0&quot;&gt;This study is the assessment of each factors of quality of life in studied villages from&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;householders&amp;#39; point of view. According to the obtained average value of 2.75, analytical&amp;nbsp;results in the case of social factor are assessed which is under the average. According to&amp;nbsp;the obtained average value of 3.43, in the case of social security, the studied households&amp;#39;&amp;nbsp;condition has been estimated more than the average and findings related to average&amp;nbsp;comparison in this factor shows that Delfard village has the worst condition and&amp;nbsp;Sarbijan village has the best condition. According to the average value of 0.74 in the&amp;nbsp;case of housing factor, the housing status in the studied villages was estimated more&amp;nbsp;than the average. The results of average comparison showed that Halil village is on the&amp;nbsp;highest level and Esfandegheh village is on the lowest level in the case of average&amp;nbsp;factor. According to the average value of 20.38 which is related to the third group that&amp;nbsp;means most of the studied population, income factor showed that most of studied&amp;nbsp;population have average income and among them, comparing other studied villages,&amp;nbsp;residents of Khaton-abad village have the highest level in the case of average income&amp;nbsp;and it is different from other studied villages. Next factor is wealth which is assessed by&amp;nbsp;five subset. According to the average value of 0.41 in this factor, it can be said that the&amp;nbsp;level of wealth in studied villages is lower than average level and among them, Delfard&amp;nbsp;and Ganj-abad villages are at the lowest level and Esfandegheh and Sarbijan villages are&amp;nbsp;at the highest level. Next factor is per capita household expenditure on clothing; the&amp;nbsp;result of analyzing this factor shows that given the frequency of 192 people (54.9%),&amp;nbsp;per capita expenditure on clothing for each person is between 200 to 300 hundred&amp;nbsp;Tomans in a year and comparing to other villages, Delfard village has a better condition&amp;nbsp;regarding the average level of this factor. The results in the nutrition factor shows that&amp;nbsp;villages located in this region are divided to four grades regarding the average calories&amp;nbsp;intake per gram in food by households. Among them, Delfard village is completely&amp;nbsp;different from other villages and in terms of calories amount that its residents consume,&amp;nbsp;this village has a better condition. The last studied factor is people&amp;#39;s satisfaction of&amp;nbsp;objective dimensions of quality of life. According to the obtained average value of 3.15&amp;nbsp;which is higher than theoretical average (number 3), considering this factor, the status&amp;nbsp;of studied households is assessed higher than the average level. The results of average&amp;nbsp;comparison in this factor show that all the villages are divided to four classes regarding&amp;nbsp;the average value of the considered factor. Among them Dolat-abad and Ganj-abad&amp;nbsp;villages have the worst and Esfandegheh and Delfard villages have the best condition.&lt;/div&gt;
</abstract>
	<keyword_fa>کیفیت زندگی , شاخص های عینی , شاخص های ذهنی , مرکز دهستان , جیرفت , </keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Quality of Life, Physical Factors, Mental Factors, Centers of Rural Districts, Jiroft.</keyword>
	<start_page>19</start_page>
	<end_page>40</end_page>
	<web_url>http://serd.khu.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-3-21&amp;slc_lang=fa&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Saleh</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Shahrokhi Sardou</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>صالح</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>شاهرخی ساردو</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>saleh.sh0028@yahoo.com</email>
	<code>10031947532846001939</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846001939</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>M.A. of Rural Development, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran. </affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>کارشناسی ارشد توسعه روستایی، دانشگاه یاسوج، یاسوج، ایران</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Mehdi</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Nooripoor</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>مهدی</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>نوری پور</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>mnooripoor@ymail.com</email>
	<code>10031947532846001940</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846001940</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Associate professor of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran. </affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>دانشیار ترویج کشاورزی و توسعه روستایی، دانشگاه یاسوج، یاسوج، ایران</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
