<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>SPACE ECONOMY &amp; RURAL DEVELOPMENT</title>
<title_fa>اقتصاد فضا و توسعه روستایی</title_fa>
<short_title>serd</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://serd.khu.ac.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2322-2131</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2588-476X</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.66224/serd</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>4444</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>fa</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1395</year>
	<month>2</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2016</year>
	<month>5</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>5</volume>
<number>15</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>fa</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa>چارچوب جامع سنجش پایداری نظام های بهره برداری از زمین </title_fa>
	<title>A Comprehensive Framework in Sustainability Assessment of Agricultural Exploitation Systems</title>
	<subject_fa>تخصصي</subject_fa>
	<subject>Special</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa>&lt;p dir=&quot;RTL&quot; style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;یکی از مهم&amp;shy;ترین چالش&amp;shy;های سنجش پایداری در نظام&amp;shy;های بهره&amp;shy;برداری از زمین، فقدان چارچوبی جامع در این زمینه است. همین امر سبب شکل&amp;shy;گیری نگرش تک بعدی در بسیاری از تحقیقات پایداری شده است. از این &amp;shy;رو در پژوهش حاضر سعی شده است در ابتدا با شیوه&amp;shy;ای نقادانه به شناسایی چارچوبی جامع جهت سنجش پایداری در نظام&amp;shy;های بهره&amp;shy;برداری از زمین پرداخته شود. سپس با استفاده از روش تحلیل سلسله مراتبی فازی (&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;LTR&quot;&gt;FAHP&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;) به وزن دهی مؤلفه&#8204;ها در چارچوب شناسایی&#8204;شده پرداخته شود؛ برای این منظور، نظرات 12 نفر از متخصصان کلیدی در زمینه نظام&amp;shy;های بهره&amp;shy;برداری از زمین مورد مطالعه و بررسی قرار گرفته است. مقایسات زوجی صورت گرفته توسط آنان نشان داد به ترتیب معیار مدیریت، &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;سرمایه، آسیب&amp;shy;پذیری&amp;shy; و تنش&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt; دارای بیشترین اهمیت در سنجش پایداری نظام&amp;shy;ها بهره&amp;shy;برداری از زمین است. در این راستا توصیه می&amp;shy;شود محققان از چارچوب شناسایی&#8204;شده و وزن&amp;shy;های فازی آن به عنوان چارچوبی جامع جهت سنجش پایداری در نظام&amp;shy;های بهره&amp;shy;برداری از زمین استفاده نمایند.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle0&quot;&gt;Introduction&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle1&quot;&gt;Lack of a comprehensive framework is one of the most important challenges in&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;sustainability assessment of Agricultural Exploitation Systems. This is the reason of&amp;nbsp;tunnel vision in many researches in the field of sustainability. The history of Agricultural&amp;nbsp;Exploitation Systems in Iran is back to thousands years ago, when ancient Iranian tried&amp;nbsp;to domesticate wild animals and cereals in Iran. So, Agricultural Exploitation Systems&amp;nbsp;are one of the fundamental issues in Iran&amp;rsquo;s agriculture section and these systems are of&amp;nbsp;great importance in agricultural development of the country and even in urban&amp;nbsp;development. Studies show that since very beginning, governments focused their&amp;nbsp;attention on this system because of its potentials and capabilities such as production, job&amp;nbsp;creation, and generating income and this caused major changes and development.&amp;nbsp;According to the performed studies, there are different frameworks for sustainability&amp;nbsp;assessment of Agricultural Exploitation Systems. Most of these frameworks consider the&amp;nbsp;sustainability issue not holistically and try to investigate the sustainability issue just in&amp;nbsp;economic, social and environmental dimensions. In these frameworks, some dimensions&amp;nbsp;of sustainability are highlighted, while highlighting some dimensions is in contradiction&amp;nbsp;to holistic view in sustainability assessment. Therefore, this study aims to introduce those&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle1&quot;&gt;frameworks that are related to sustainability assessment of Agricultural Exploitation&amp;nbsp;Systems and considers their inefficiencies and it also aims to introduce a comprehensive&amp;nbsp;framework.&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle0&quot;&gt;Methodology&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle1&quot;&gt;By using a critical method, this qualitative and quantitative study tries to introduce a&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;comprehensive framework to assess sustainability of Agricultural Exploitation Systems;&amp;nbsp;By using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, this study gives weight to the existing criteria&amp;nbsp;and sub-criterion in the recognized framework. To do so, two criteria were used for&amp;nbsp;selecting the experts: First, recognized people have experiences in field studies in the case&amp;nbsp;of Agricultural Exploitation Systems; they also have some documentary researches such&amp;nbsp;as article, book an research projects. In this stage, different methods of sampling have&amp;nbsp;been used including criterion-based sampling, snowball sampling and opportunistic&amp;nbsp;sampling. Following that, participants were asked to perform pairwise comparisons in&amp;nbsp;criteria and sub-criterion level; and to calculate fuzzy numbers in FAHP, Kong &amp; Liu&amp;nbsp;method has been used.&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle0&quot;&gt;Discussion and Conclusion&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle2&quot;&gt;Among four criteria that are effective in sustainability of Agricultural Exploitation&amp;nbsp;Systems, management, capitals, vulnerability and tensions are the most important ones&amp;nbsp;respectively. Based on experts&amp;rsquo; comments, management issue is the most important&amp;nbsp;criteria among all other criteria. In fact, management is a determinant factor in providing&amp;nbsp;or not providing sustainability in the system; So, this is one of the most important issues&amp;nbsp;is sustainability assessment of Agricultural Exploitation Systems that needs more&amp;nbsp;consideration. Fuzzy comparison matrix and deriving weights of these criteria showed&amp;nbsp;that social capacity as a sub-criterion in deriving weights is the most importance criteria.&amp;nbsp;Capital is the second effective criteria in assessment of agricultural farming sustainability&amp;nbsp;and it is rarely mentioned in other presented frameworks. Fuzzy ranking of various&amp;nbsp;capitals showed that human capital is weighted as the most important capital. This finding&amp;nbsp;confirms that development tools are not located in mountains, plains an under the ground&amp;nbsp;but they must be investigated inside the human brain. Performing fuzzy comparisons in&amp;nbsp;the case of tension as a sub-criterion showed that productivity is the most important&amp;nbsp;criteria in determining Agricultural Exploitation Systems. Other sub-criterion are&amp;nbsp;stability, compatibility, flexibility and reliability respectively. Deriving weights of subcriterion in the case of vulnerability showed that vulnerability in economic, social and&amp;nbsp;environmental vulnerabilities are the most important criteria for sustainability assessmentof Agricultural Exploitation Systems. According to the obtained results, it is&amp;nbsp;recommended to use the proposed framework and the derived weights as the standards&amp;nbsp;for sustainability assessment of Agricultural Exploitation Systems.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</abstract>
	<keyword_fa>نظام های بهره برداری از زمین, پایداری, چارچوب جامع, تحلیل سلسله مراتبی فازی.</keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Agricultural Exploitation Systems, Sustainability, Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process.</keyword>
	<start_page>1</start_page>
	<end_page>19</end_page>
	<web_url>http://serd.khu.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-2-24&amp;slc_lang=fa&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Shahpar </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Geravandi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>شهپر</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>گراوندی</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>sh.geravandi1@gmail.com</email>
	<code>10031947532846001817</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846001817</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Ph.D. Candidate of Agriculture Development, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah. Iran. </affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>دانشجوی دکتری توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران.</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Abdol Hamid</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Popzan</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>عبدالحمید</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>پاپ زن</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846001818</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846001818</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Associate Prof, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University Kermanshah, Kermanshah, Iran. </affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>نشیار و عضو هیأت علمی ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران.</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
