Volume 26, Issue 80 (3-2026)
jgs 2026, 26(80): 0-0 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
nazaryan Y, haghzad A, ebrahimi L, abozorgmehr51 K. (2026). Analysis of urban resilience against earthquakes with emphasis Land use planning (Case study: Tabriz metropolis). jgs. 26(80),
URL: http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3832-en.html
URL: http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3832-en.html
1- Islamic Azad University of Chalus
2- Islamic Azad University of Chalus ,Ameneh_haghzad@yahoo.com
2- Islamic Azad University of Chalus ,
Abstract: (10998 Views)
Vulnerability is the inevitable result of risks and crises that threaten societies to varying degrees. One of the main threats is earthquakes. The recent approach to disaster management programs is to increase the resilience of communities that have different dimensions. One of them is the physical dimension of urban resilience, which is linked to the components of land use planning. In this research, with the aim of analyzing land use criteria affecting the resilience of Tabriz city and using fuzzy AHP method, research has been done.
Based on the results of the study of theoretical foundations, 13 effective criteria have been identified and the basis of action. The required data were extracted and used from maps and spatial information of urban plans, especially the detailed plan of Tabriz, Then Using ARC Map10.3.1 software, each criterion is analyzed and each criterion is presented in the form of a fuzzy map. Sum, Product and gamma fuzzy operators have been used to achieve the final resilience map. Due to the high accuracy of the gamma operator, its results are considered as the final output.
The results show that in the city of Tabriz, 2% have very low resilience, 40.8%, low resilience,15.3% moderate resilience, 23.5% high resilience and 7.2% very high resilience - based on the Used criteria-. Areas with low resilience are generally located in the north of Tabriz city and correspond to the informal settlement texture and the worn-out texture of the city, which corresponds to the fault line of Tabriz and Micronutrient and permeability are other features of these areas. Due to the high population density in these areas, it is necessary to immediately adopt the necessary programs to improve the quality of physical resilience criteria in the city.
Based on the results of the study of theoretical foundations, 13 effective criteria have been identified and the basis of action. The required data were extracted and used from maps and spatial information of urban plans, especially the detailed plan of Tabriz, Then Using ARC Map10.3.1 software, each criterion is analyzed and each criterion is presented in the form of a fuzzy map. Sum, Product and gamma fuzzy operators have been used to achieve the final resilience map. Due to the high accuracy of the gamma operator, its results are considered as the final output.
The results show that in the city of Tabriz, 2% have very low resilience, 40.8%, low resilience,15.3% moderate resilience, 23.5% high resilience and 7.2% very high resilience - based on the Used criteria-. Areas with low resilience are generally located in the north of Tabriz city and correspond to the informal settlement texture and the worn-out texture of the city, which corresponds to the fault line of Tabriz and Micronutrient and permeability are other features of these areas. Due to the high population density in these areas, it is necessary to immediately adopt the necessary programs to improve the quality of physical resilience criteria in the city.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Geography and Urban Planning
References
1. احدنژاد، محسن؛ محمدی ترکمانی،حجت؛ خوش روی، قهرمان(1394). مدلسازی آسیب پذیری اجتماعی شهرها در برابر زلزله با استفاده از فرایند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی و نرام افزارGIS. فصلنامه برنامه ریزی توسعه شهری و منطقه ای. 1(2):32-1.
2. پورمحمدی، محمدرضا؛ یوسفی شهیر، هانیه؛ حسین زاده دلیر، کریم(1397). ارزیابی تاب آوری کاربری های حیاتی کلان شهر تبریز در برابر مخاطره طبیعی زلزله. پژوهش های جغرافیای برنامه ریزی شهری. 6(1): 55-74.
3. دادرسی سبزواری، ابولقاسم؛ خسروشاهی، محمد(1387). شناخت مناطق مستعد برای گسترش سیلاب به روش کاربرد مدل های مفهومی(راهکاری برای مهار بیابانزایی)، فصلنامه تحقیقات مرتع و بیابان ایران، 15(2): 241-227.
4. زیاری، کرامت الله؛ اسدی، صالح، ربانی، طاها، مولائی، محمد(1392). ارزیابی ساختاری فضایی و تدوین راهبردهای توسعه شهری شهر جدید پردیس. پژوهش های جغرافیای انسانی. 45(4): 1-28.
5. شماعی، علی؛ میرزاده، حجت(1398). تحلیل فضایی تابآوری مناطق شهرتبریز در برابر زلزله. نشریه مخاطرات محیط طبیعی. 8(20): 245-266.
6. شهرداری تبریز(1392). اهم ضوابط و مقررات طرح تفصیلی تبریز.
7. صفاری، امیر؛ جان احمدی،مریم؛ رعیتی شوازی،منیره(1394).کاربرد مدل تلفیق AHP/Fuzzy در مکان یابی عرصه های مناسب پخش سیلاب جهت تغذیه مصنوعی. فصلنامه هیدروژئومورفوولوژی، 1(3):97-81.
8. فرزاد بهتاش، محمدرضا(1393). تبیین ابعاد اجتماعی تاب آوری شهری؛ مطالعه موردی: شهر تبریز. رساله دکتری تخصصی. گروه شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اسلامی تبریز.
9. فرزاد بهتاش، محمدرضا؛ کی نژاد، محمدعلی؛ پیربابائی، محمدتقی؛ عسگری، علی(1392). ارزیابی و تحلیل ابعاد و مؤلفههای تابآوری کلانشهر تبریز. نشریه هنرهای زیبا. 18(3): 33-42.
10. فرید احمدی نیا، لادن(1396). مطالعه تطبیقی تاب آوری در سطح محلات قدیم و جدید کلانشهر تبریز؛ مطالعه موردی: محلات شتربان و ولیعصر. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد. گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه تبریز.
11. قنواتی، عزت الله؛ دلفانی گودرزی، فاطمه(1392). مکان یابی بهینه توسعه شهری با تاکید بر پارامترهای طبیعی با استفاده از مدل تلفیقی فازی/AHP(مطالعه موردی: شهرستان بروجرد). دو فصلنامه ژئومورفولوژی کاربردی ایران. 1(1):60-45.
12. مرکز آمار ایران(1395). نتایج سرشماری عمومی نفوس و مسکن.
13. مرکز مطالعات و برنامه ریزی شهری شهر تهران(1385). گزارش طرح جامع شهر تهران. تهران: وزارت راه و شهرسازی.
14. Allan, p., Bryant, M. (2010). The Critical role of Open Space in Earthquake Recovery: A Case study. NZSEE Conference, Victoria university of Wellington, Wellington New Zealand.
15. Asian Development Bank, (2016). REDUCING DISASTER RISK BY MANAGING URBAN LAND USE: Guidance Notes for Planners. From: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/185415/disaster-risk-urban-land.pdf
16. Berke. Ph, Smith. G, (2006). Hazard Mitigation, Planning, and Disaster Resiliency: Challenges and Strategic Choices for the 21st Century, In Sustainable Development and Disaster Resiliency, The Netherlands: IOS Press, Amersterdam.
17. Bonham-Carter, G. F. (1991). Geographic Information System for Geoscientists: Modeling with GIS, Pergamon, Ontario, 300p.
18. CARPENTER, S. R., ARROW, K. J., BARRETT, S., BIGGS, R., BROCK, W. A., CRÉPIN, A.-S., ENGSTRÖM, G., FOLKE, C., HUGHES, T. P. & KAUTSKY, N. (2012). General resilience to cope with extreme events. Sustainability, 4: 3248-3259. Retrieved from: http://www.mdpi.com/20711050/4/12/3248/htm [DOI:10.3390/su4123248]
19. Colten, C.E. et al. (2008), Community resilience: lessons from New Orleans and Hurricane Katrina, CARRI Research Report 3, Community and Regional Resilience Initiative, 1-5.
20. Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Evans, E., Tate, E. and Webb, J. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change,18 (4): 598-606. [DOI:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013]
21. Cutter, S. L., Christopher, G., Burton, & Christopher, T. E. (2010). Disaster Resilience Indicators for Benchmarking Baseline Conditions. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 7 (1): 1-22. [DOI:10.2202/1547-7355.1732]
22. Fiksel, J. (2006). Sustainability and resilience: Toward a systems approach. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy, (2): 14-21. [DOI:10.1080/15487733.2006.11907980]
23. Ghayoumian, J., Mohseni Saravi, M., Feiznia, S., Nouri, B. and Malekian, A. (2007). Application of GIS techniques to determine areas most suitable for artificial groundwater recharge in a coastal aquifer in southern Iran. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 30(2): 364-374. [DOI:10.1016/j.jseaes.2006.11.002]
24. Godschalk, D. (2003). Urban Hazard Mitigation: Creating Resilient Cities. Natural Hazard. ASCE,4(3):136-143. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)]
25. Holling, C.S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst, 4: 1-123. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245]
26. Jha, K., Miner, W. Geddes, S. (2012). Building urban resilience: principles, tools, and practice, The world Bank. [DOI:10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5]
27. Krawinkler, H. (2011). Challenges in improving earthquake resilience through performance based earthquake engineering. In Proceedings of the Bled4-2011 International Workshop on Performance-Based Seismic Engineering Vision for an Earthquake Resilient Society, Bled, Slovenia, 24-27.
28. Maguire, B. & P. C. Hagen (2007). Disasters and communities: understanding social resilience. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 22: 16-20. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.00339.x] [PMID]
29. Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and Multi criteria Decision Analysis, New York, John Wiley & Sons Incorporated.
30. Meerow, S., Newell, J. & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147: 38-49. [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011]
31. Norris, F. H. et al. (2003). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Bruneau, M. et al. (2003). Resilience: An Integrated Approach, Charles C. Thomas, spring field, IL
32. ORMAN, W. (2012). Adapting to change: the role of community resilience. Young Foundation. Retrieved from: http:// youngfoundation.org/ wp- content/uploads/2012/10/Adapting-to ChangeOctober-2012.pdf
33. Retrieved from: http://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275113000048
34. Reyes, ML. (2007). Risk- sensitive land use planning: Integrating Disaster Risk Reduction in the Practice and process of land use planning. university of the Philippines.
35. Ritchie, H.; Roser, M. (2019). Natural Disasters. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/natural-disasters (accessed on 16 August 2019).
36. STUMPP, E.-M. (2013). New in town? On resilience and "Resilient Cities". Cities, 32: 164-166. [DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2013.01.003]
37. Thurston, R.H. (1871). On the strength, elasticity, ductility and resilience of materials of machine construction. J. Frankl. Inst. 97, 344-356. [DOI:10.1016/0016-0032(74)90403-7]
38. UNISDR (United nation international strategy for disaster risk reduction). (2005). Hyogo framework for2005-2015: Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. http://www.unisdr.org/wcdr/intergover/official-doc/L-docs/ Hyogo framework for-action-english.pdf. Accessed on 22 June 2005.
39. Wallemacq, P.; Below, R.; McLean, D. (2019). UNISDR and CRED report: Economic losses, poverty & disasters (1998-2017). EMDAT, The International Disaster Database. Available online: https://www.unisdr.org/files/61119_credeconomiclosses.pdf (accessed on 16 August2019).
40. Zhou, H. Wang, J. Wan, J. Jia, H. (2009). Resilience to natural hazards: A geographic perspective, Nat Hazards, DOI:10.1007/s11069- 009- 9407-y. [DOI:10.1007/s11069-009-9407-y]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)