Volume 23, Issue 69 (6-2023)
jgs 2023, 23(69): 381-401 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mohamadpour shatery M, taghizadeh H, khoshfetrat S. (2023). Model the allocation of productive financial resources from the perspective of livelihood poverty indicators using a combination of clustering methods and SAW technique. jgs. 23(69), : 20 doi:10.61186/jgs.23.69.381
URL: http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3805-en.html
URL: http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3805-en.html
1- Ph.D. Student, Department of Management, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran., Ph.D. Student, Department of Management, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.
2- Professor, Department of Management, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran (Correspondimg Author), Professor, Department of Management, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran (Correspondimg Author) ,taghizadeh@iaut.ac.ir
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran, Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
2- Professor, Department of Management, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran (Correspondimg Author), Professor, Department of Management, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran (Correspondimg Author) ,
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran, Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract: (3652 Views)
Poverty is a social, economic, cultural and political reality that has long been one of the greatest human problems. The diversity of problems, needs and problems of the deprived and low-income groups of the society and the multiplicity of poverty indicators on the one hand, and on the other hand the lack of financial resources and credits to solve the poverty indicators, organizations in charge of poor affairs, including Imam Khomeini Relief Committee Has faced serious challenges in the optimal allocation of resources. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to classify the clients of Tabriz Relief Committee from the perspective of livelihood poverty indicators, ranking these clusters in terms of cost and finally allocating productive and optimal resources for each cluster. In this way, with the least resources, a wide range of the needy benefit from these resources. To do this, with cluster analysis of data extracted from the system, 700 clients of Tabriz Relief Committee have been clustered from the perspective of livelihood poverty indicators and K-mean method. The results of this study were a cluster structure consisting of 10 clusters, which according to the characteristics of the clusters, titles for the clusters were considered. Finally, in order to rank the clusters, a multi-characteristic SAW decision-making method has been used. The research findings show the difference between the effectiveness of allocation in clustering method compared to other traditional methods.
Article number: 20
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Geography and Urban Planning
References
1. ابونوری، اسماعیل. عباسی قادری، رضا، (۱۳۸۶)؛ برآورد اثر رشد اقتصادی بر فقر در ایران، فصلنامه پژوهش‌های اقتصادی ایران، 9(30).
2. پیرائی، خسرو؛ شهسوار، محمدرضا. (۱۳۸۸). بررسی وضعیت فقر در مناطق شهری و روستایی استان فارس. پژوهش¬نامه اقتصادی 9(3): ۲۳۳-264.
3. حسن‌زاده، علی. (۱۳۷۹). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر فقر: مطالعه موردی ایران. پایان¬نامه دوره دکتری تخصصی. دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم تحقیقات.
4. خالدی، کوهسار؛ پرمه، زورار. (۱۳۸4). بررسی وضعیت فقر در مناطق شهری و روستایی ایران (۱۳۷۵-۱۳۸۲). اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه. (49): ۸4-۵۷.
5. خداداد کاشی، فرهاد، (۱۳۷۷). اندازه¬گیری فقر در ایران برحسب خصوصیات اجتماعی و اقتصادی خانوارها، کاربرد شاخص سن در ایران، پژوهشنامه بازرگانی، (8).
6. رسول اف، جلال؛ منصور، سیفی و داریوش، رشیدي (1380) شناسایی سطوح نیازها و عوامل مؤثر بر رضایت مشتریان: پیش‌نیازی براي اصلاحات ساختاري در نظام بانکی، یازدهمین کنفرانس سالانه سیاست‌هاي پولی و ارزي، تهران: پژوهشکده پولی و بانکی.
7. زاهدی مازندرانی، محمدجواد (۱۳۸4)، فقر روستایی، روند و اندازه‌گیری در ایران، فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی رفاه اجتماعی، 4(17).
8. عرب مازار، ع. حسینی نژاد، م. 1383. عوامل مؤثر بر فقر خانوارهای شاغل روستایی در ایران. جستارهای اقتصادی، 1(1): 67-94.
9. کیم، جا- آن؛ مولر، دبلیو چارلز (1378)، " کاربرد تحلیل عاملی در پژوهش اجتماعی " مسعود کوثري، چاپ اول، تهران: سلمان.
10. محمد زاده، پرویز فلاحی، فیروز و حکمتی فرید، صمد. (۱۳۹۰). بررسی فقر و عوامل تعیین‌کننده‌ی آن در بین خانوارهای شهری کشور. فصل¬نامه تحقیقات مدل¬سازی اقتصادی، 1(2): ۹4 - 41.
11. مهرگان، محمدرضا؛ عزت‌الله، اصغري زاده، حسین و صفري (1387)، طراحی مدلی براي بررسی رقابت‌پذیري در سطح بنگاه با استفاده از مدل¬سازي معادلات ساختاریافته، مطالعه موردي: شرکت ملی پتروشیمی ایران، فصلنامه پژوهشنامه بازرگانی، (46).
12. Aliber, M. 2003. Chronic poverty in South Africa: Incidence, causes and policies. World Development, 31 (3): 473-490. [DOI:10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00219-X]
13. Atkinson, B. (1989). "Poverty and Social Security". New York. Harvester Wheatsheaf. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-349-19806-1_27]
14. Baulch, B. and Hoddinott, J. 2000. Economic mobility and poverty dynamics in developing countries. Journal of Development Studies, 36 (6):1-24. [DOI:10.1080/00220380008422652]
15. Bryceson, D.F. 1996. Deagrarianization and rurel employment in sub-saharan Africa: A sectoral perspective. World Development, 24(1):97-111. [DOI:10.1016/0305-750X(95)00119-W]
16. Chamber, R. 2004. Whose reality counts Putting the first last. London: IT Publications.
17. Chambers, R. Longhurst, R. and Pacey, A. 1981. Seasonal dimensions to rural poverty. London: Frances Pinter.
18. Chapotp, A. Banda, D. Haggbland, S. and Hamukwala, P. 2011. Factors affecting poverty dynamics in rureal Zambia. Food Security Research Project, Working paper No. 55, Lusaka, Zambia.
19. Downing, T. 1991. Vulnerability to hanger in Africa. Global Environmental Change, 1(5):365-380. [DOI:10.1016/0959-3780(91)90003-C]
20. Ellis, F. 2000. The determinants of rural livelihood diversification in developing countries. Journal of Agricultural Economiccs, 51(2): 289-302. [DOI:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2000.tb01229.x]
21. Gentle, P. and Maraseny,T.N. 2012. Climate change,poverty and livelihoods: Adaptation practices by rurel mountain communities in Nepal. Environmental Science &Pplicy, 21: 24-34. [DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.007]
22. Hayati, D. and Karami, E. 2005. Typology of causes of poverty: The perception of Iranian farmers. Journal of Economic psychology, 26: 884-901. [DOI:10.1016/j.joep.2005.05.002]
23. Hayati, D. Karami, E. and Slee, B. 2004. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in the measurement of rural poverty: The case of iran. Social Indicators Research, 75: 361-394. [DOI:10.1007/s11205-004-6299-9]
24. Janvery, A. and Sadoulet, E. 2003. Rural poverty in latin America.agricultural Research and poverty Reduction: some Issus and Evidence, pp. 105-130.
25. Kannan G, Haq, A.N., Sasikumar, P., Arunachalam, S. (2008). Analysis and selection of green suppliers using interpretative structural modeling and analytic hierarchy process, International Journal of Management and Decision making; 9(2): 163.82. [DOI:10.1504/IJMDM.2008.017198]
26. Key, C. 2006. Rural poverty and development strategies in Latin America. Journal of Agrarian Change, 6 (4): 455-508. [DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0366.2006.00132.x]
27. Long, N. 2001. Development sociology: actor perspectives. London: Routledge.
28. Neff, D. 2013. Fuzzy set theoretic applications in poverty research. Policy and Society, 32(4):319-331. [DOI:10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.10.004]
29. Ravallion, M. 2010. Troubling tradeoffs in the human development index. World development policy research, working paper No. 5484. Washington: World Bank. [DOI:10.1596/1813-9450-5484]
30. Rigg, J. Land, farming, livelihoods, and poverty: Rethinking the links in the rural South. World development, 34(1):180-202. [DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.015]
31. Scoones, I. 1998. Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. Institute for Development studies, Working paper No. 72. University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
32. Sen, A. 1999. Development as freedom. Oxford Univershty press.
33. Sen, A. K. (1994). "Issues in the Measurement of Poverty". Scandinavian. Journal of Economics, 81 (2). [DOI:10.2307/3439966]
34. Siegel, P. and Alwang, J. 1999. An asset-based approach to social risc management: A conceptual framework. Social protection discussion paper No. 9926. Washington: World Bank.
35. Spicker, P. Gordon, D. 1998. The international poverty glossary. London: Zed Books.
36. Sullivan, C. 2002. Calculating a water poverty index. World Development, 30(7): 1195-1210. [DOI:10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00035-9]
37. Swift, J. and Hamilton, K. 2001. Household food and livelihood security. In devereux, S. and Maxwell, S. (eds.), Food Security in sub-Saharan Africa. London: ITDG Publishing. [DOI:10.3362/9781780440170.004]
38. Townsend, P. (1979). "Poverty in the United Kingdom". London. Penguin. [DOI:10.1525/9780520325760]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)