Volume 10, Issue 4 (12-2023)
Journal of Spatial Analysis Environmental Hazards 2023, 10(4): 59-78 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Karami T, Shamaei A, Mohebi F. Analysis of the role of urban green infrastructure changes in the ecological resilience of District 1 of Tehran Municipality. Journal of Spatial Analysis Environmental Hazards 2023; 10 (4) :59-78
URL: http://jsaeh.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3338-en.html
URL: http://jsaeh.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3338-en.html
1- , karamit@khu.ac.ir
Abstract: (1409 Views)
Abstract
Ecological resilience is a concept that implies the reversibility of ecological structures and functions against the shocks experienced. The northern zone of Tehran, as the most important ecological support of this city, has undergone many land-use changes in recent decades. The present study has analyzed the role of land-use change in the ecological resilience of green infrastructure (as one of the pillars of ecological structure) in District 1 of Tehran Municipality. This study is an applied one in terms of purpose and is considered a descriptive-analytical one in terms of the method used. In this study Landsat satellite data (1976-2021) were used to detect the changes of interest, and landscape metrics were used to analyze the ecological resilience conditions. Based on the results of this study period, the Number of Patches (NP) has significantly increased and the Class Area (CA) has decreased during the period covered by this study. These changes indicate the fragmentation process and loss of structural cohesion of the green patches. The measurement results for the connectivity metrics (ENN and GYRATE) also showed a small connectivity between the green patches in the area. In addition, the results for CONTAG (Contagion Landscape metrics) measure indicated that, due to low connectivity, the transmission rate is low. Therefore, it can be said that the green infrastructure of the region has lost its structural cohesion in the face of land-use change, and as a result, the expected ecological functions and services have also failed. According to the results, the green infrastructure of the study area is vulnerable to land-use changes and their ecological resilience has been significantly reduced.
Ecological resilience is a concept that implies the reversibility of ecological structures and functions against the shocks experienced. The northern zone of Tehran, as the most important ecological support of this city, has undergone many land-use changes in recent decades. The present study has analyzed the role of land-use change in the ecological resilience of green infrastructure (as one of the pillars of ecological structure) in District 1 of Tehran Municipality. This study is an applied one in terms of purpose and is considered a descriptive-analytical one in terms of the method used. In this study Landsat satellite data (1976-2021) were used to detect the changes of interest, and landscape metrics were used to analyze the ecological resilience conditions. Based on the results of this study period, the Number of Patches (NP) has significantly increased and the Class Area (CA) has decreased during the period covered by this study. These changes indicate the fragmentation process and loss of structural cohesion of the green patches. The measurement results for the connectivity metrics (ENN and GYRATE) also showed a small connectivity between the green patches in the area. In addition, the results for CONTAG (Contagion Landscape metrics) measure indicated that, due to low connectivity, the transmission rate is low. Therefore, it can be said that the green infrastructure of the region has lost its structural cohesion in the face of land-use change, and as a result, the expected ecological functions and services have also failed. According to the results, the green infrastructure of the study area is vulnerable to land-use changes and their ecological resilience has been significantly reduced.
Keywords: Ecological resilience, land -use change, green infrastructure, landscape metrics, District 1 of Tehran Municipality
Type of Study: Applicable |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2022/10/4 | Accepted: 2023/12/17 | Published: 2024/04/28
Received: 2022/10/4 | Accepted: 2023/12/17 | Published: 2024/04/28
References
1. استیونسون، دبورا. 1388. شهرها و فرهنگ‌های شهری. ترجمه رجب پناهی و احمد پوراحمد. مرکز مطالعاتی و تحقیقاتی شهرسازی و معماری. تهران.
2. پریور، پرستو؛ احد ستوده. آیدا احمدی. 1399. تفکر تاب آوری، مفاهیم و کاربردها در مدیریت محیط زیست شهری. نوبت اول. یزد.
3. پریور، پرستو؛ یاوری، احمدرضا و ستوده، احد. 1387. تحلیل تغییرات زمانی و توزیع مکانی فضاهای سبز شهری تهران در مقیاس سیمای سرزمین. محیط شناسی، 34 (45)، 73- 84.
4. چگینی، رباب. 1391. تبیین پیامدهای کالبدی ادغام هسته‌های روستایی در فرایند گسترش شهر(مورد: منطقه یک شهرداری تهران). رساله دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری به راهنمایی دکتر محمد سلیمانی و حسن افراخته. دانشگاه خوارزمی. تهران.
5. رهنمایی، محمدتقی(1381)، مجموعه مباحث شهرسازی (جلد جغرافیا)، تهران، وزارت مسکن و شهرسازی، مرکز تحقیقات شهرساز و معماری ایران.
6. رئیس‌دانا، فریبرز، (1381)، "اقتصاد سیاسی توسعه"، انتشارات نگاه، تهران.
7. فاطمی، سید باقر؛ یوسف رضائی.1396.مبانی سنجش از دور. چاپ پنجم. تهران.
8. عظیمی (آرانی)، حسین.1388. مدارهای توسعه‌نیافتگی در اقتصاد ایران. نشر نی. چاپ دهم. تهران.
9. کرمی، تاج‌الدین. و دیگران. 1391. بایسته‌های بوم‌شناسی سیاسی شهر: الگوی توزیع تاج‌پوشش درختی و نابرابری فضایی در شهر تهران. مطالعات و پژوهش‌های شهری و منطقه‌ای. دوره 4, شماره 13. تابستان 1391 : 22-1.
10. مثنوی، محمدرضا؛ دبیری، مریم. 1396. ارزش‌گذاری خدمات اکوسیستم شهری به عنوان ابزاری برای برنامه‌ریزی شهرهایی پایدارتر. نشریه منظر. صص 35-24.
11. مدنی‌پور، علی. 1381. تهران ظهور یک کلانشهر. ترجمه حمید زرآزوند. شرکت پردازش و برنامه‌ریزی شهر تهران.
12. مهندسان مشاور بافت شهر.1381. بررسی مسائل توسعه شهری منطقه یک تهران. شهرداری منطقه یک.
13. یوسف زاده، الهام و دیگران (1396)، "ارزیابی تابآوری خدمات اکوسیستمی در محیطزیست شهری )مطالعه موردی شهر یزد"، مجله پژوهش‌های محیطزیست، سال 8 ، شماره 16 ، پاییز و زمستان 1396 ، 28-15.
14. Alberti, M., & Marzluff, J. M. (2004) Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems: linking urban patterns to human and ecological functions. Urban ecosystems, Vol 7 No 3, pp.241-265.
15. Evans, D. L., Falagán, N., Hardman, C. A., Kourmpetli, S., Liu, L., Mead, B. R., & Davies, J. A. C. (2022). Ecosystem service delivery by urban agriculture and green infrastructure–a systematic review. Ecosystem Services, 54, 101405.
16. Fu, S., Zhuo, H., Song, H., Wang, J., & Ren, L. (2020). Examination of a coupling coordination relationship between urbanization and the eco-environment: A case study in Qingdao, , China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(19), 23981–23993.
17. Heynen Nik, Harold A. Perkins and Parama Roy, (2006), The Political Ecology of Uneven Urban Green Space, The Impact of Political Economy on Race and Ethnicity in Producing Environmental Inequality in Milwaukee, Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 42 N. 1: 3-25, September.
18. Liu, Z., Xiu, C., & Ye, C. (2020). Improving Urban Resilience through Green Infrastructure: An Integrated Approach for Connectivity Conservation in the Central City of Shenyang, China. Complexity, 2020.
19. Mather, P. M., & Koch, M. (2011). Computer processing of remotely-sensed images: an introduction. John Wiley & Sons.
20. Marzluff, J. M. (2001). Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. In Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world (pp. 19-47). Springer, Boston, MA.
21. McGarigal, K., Cushman, S. A., Neel, M. C. Ene, E., (2002), "Fragstats: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps", Oregon State University: Corvallis.
22. McPhearson, T., Andersson, E., Elmqvist, T., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2015). Resilience of and through urban ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 12, 152-156.
23. Meerow, S., & Newell, J. P. (2017). Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: Growing resilience in Detroit. Landscape and Urban Planning, 159, 62-75.
24. Nastran.Mojca, Železnikar. Špela, Cvejić. ozalija and Pintar.Marina (2016), Linkages between ecosystem services, urban green infrastructure and wellbeing, University of Ljubljana, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Available in: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304284517.
25. Pamukcu-Albers, P., Ugolini, F., La Rosa, D., Grădinaru, S. R., Azevedo, J. C., & Wu, J. (2021). Building green infrastructure to enhance urban resilience to climate change and pandemics. Landscape Ecology, 36(3), 665-673.
26. Parker, J., & Simpson, G. D. (2020). A theoretical framework for bolstering human-nature
27. Pickett, S. T., McGrath, B., Cadenasso, M. L., & Felson, A. J. (2014). Ecological resilience and resilient cities. Building Research & Information, 42(2), 143-157. connections and urban resilience via green infrastructure. Land, 9(8), 252.
28. Strahler, A. H. (1980). The use of prior probabilities in maximum likelihood classification of remotely sensed data. Remote sensing of Environment, 10(2), 135-163.
29. Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Kaźmierczak, A., Niemela, J., & James, P. (2007). Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review. Landscape and urban planning, 81(3), 167-178.
30. Wang, Y., Cai, Y., Xie, Y., Zhang, P., & Chen, L. A (2023) quantitative framework to evaluate urban ecological resilience: broadening understanding through multi-attribute perspectives. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 1144244.
31. Young, C., Symons, J., & Jones, R. (2015). Investing in Growth: Understanding the Value of Green Infrastructure Workshop Report.
32. Voghera, A., & Giudice, B. (2019). Evaluating and planning green infrastructure: a strategic perspective for sustainability and resilience. Sustainability, 11(10), 2726.
33. Wu, J., He, C., Huang, G., & Yu, D. (2013). Urban landscape ecology: Past, present, and future. In Landscape ecology for sustainable environment and culture (pp. 37-53). Springer, Dordrecht.
34. Wu, X., Zhang, J., Geng, X., Wang, T., Wang, K., & Liu, S. (2020). Increasing green infrastructure-based ecological resilience in urban systems: A perspective from locating ecological and disturbance sources in a resource-based city. Sustainable Cities and Society, 61, 102354.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
