Volume 14, Issue 52 (9-2025)
serd 2025, 14(52): 0-0 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mohammad Ghasemi M, Ghasemi A, Karim M E. Economic Performance Evaluation of New Tropical Forage Varieties in Rural Areas of Sistan (Iran). serd 2025; 14 (52) : 8
URL: http://serd.khu.ac.ir/article-1-4065-en.html
URL: http://serd.khu.ac.ir/article-1-4065-en.html
1- Department of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Sistan, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Zabol, Iran , M.MGhasemi@areeo.ac.ir
2- Department of Crop and Horticultural Sciences, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Sistan (AREEO), Zabol, Iran
3- Sustainable Rural Development Management, Zabol, Iran
2- Department of Crop and Horticultural Sciences, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Sistan (AREEO), Zabol, Iran
3- Sustainable Rural Development Management, Zabol, Iran
Abstract: (107 Views)
Objective: This study evaluates the economic performance of newly introduced tropical forage varieties, including alfalfa, in the rural regions of Sistan, specifically in Molla Hossein village of Zahak County and Molla Ebrahim village of Hamun County, during the two agricultural years 2021–2023.
Methods: The research is applied in purpose and descriptive–analytical in nature. The economic evaluation of the new forage varieties was first conducted using financial analysis, followed by economic engineering techniques and standard criteria such as Net Present Value (NPV) and Benefit–Cost Ratio (BCR). Finally, a multi-criteria decision-making technique based on the Grey System was employed from the perspective of local farmers.
Results: Results revealed that the NPV of the new tropical forage varieties was 1,023,516 IRR higher in financial analysis compared with economic analysis. Furthermore, the BCR of alfalfa varieties Omid, Baghdadi, and the locally purified Zabol line was 3.87, 3.89, 5.37, 4.7, and 3.89, respectively. The positive benefit–cost ratios confirm their economic feasibility and potential to enhance crop diversification and household income. In terms of average forage yield, the Omid variety ranked first, with fresh and dry forage yields of 107.589 t/ha and 28.323 t/ha, respectively. It was followed by Baghdadi (103.513 t/ha fresh; 26.419 t/ha dry) and the locally purified Zabol line (102.463 t/ha fresh; 27.322 t/ha dry). From the farmers’ perspective, multi-criteria decision-making analysis indicated that the most influential criteria in prioritizing forage cultivation were: increased productivity and irrigation efficiency, drought resistance, higher income generation, improved quality of life, rural retention, and enhanced employment.
Conclusions: Given the results obtained under the hot and arid experimental conditions, a significant portion of Sistan’s agricultural lands and similar agro-climatic regions can be allocated to alfalfa cultivation, particularly the Omid, Baghdadi, and the locally purified Zabol line varieties. Such an initiative would contribute substantially to crop diversification, income enhancement, and rural employment creation.
Methods: The research is applied in purpose and descriptive–analytical in nature. The economic evaluation of the new forage varieties was first conducted using financial analysis, followed by economic engineering techniques and standard criteria such as Net Present Value (NPV) and Benefit–Cost Ratio (BCR). Finally, a multi-criteria decision-making technique based on the Grey System was employed from the perspective of local farmers.
Results: Results revealed that the NPV of the new tropical forage varieties was 1,023,516 IRR higher in financial analysis compared with economic analysis. Furthermore, the BCR of alfalfa varieties Omid, Baghdadi, and the locally purified Zabol line was 3.87, 3.89, 5.37, 4.7, and 3.89, respectively. The positive benefit–cost ratios confirm their economic feasibility and potential to enhance crop diversification and household income. In terms of average forage yield, the Omid variety ranked first, with fresh and dry forage yields of 107.589 t/ha and 28.323 t/ha, respectively. It was followed by Baghdadi (103.513 t/ha fresh; 26.419 t/ha dry) and the locally purified Zabol line (102.463 t/ha fresh; 27.322 t/ha dry). From the farmers’ perspective, multi-criteria decision-making analysis indicated that the most influential criteria in prioritizing forage cultivation were: increased productivity and irrigation efficiency, drought resistance, higher income generation, improved quality of life, rural retention, and enhanced employment.
Conclusions: Given the results obtained under the hot and arid experimental conditions, a significant portion of Sistan’s agricultural lands and similar agro-climatic regions can be allocated to alfalfa cultivation, particularly the Omid, Baghdadi, and the locally purified Zabol line varieties. Such an initiative would contribute substantially to crop diversification, income enhancement, and rural employment creation.
Article number: 8
References
1. اسدی، هرمز (1402). تحلیل بهره وری اقتصادی و بهبود عملکرد تولید ذرت در نواحی روستایی شهرستان کرمانشاه. فصلنامه اقتصاد فضا و توسعه روستایی، 12 (44).
2. اسفندیاری، صادق؛ حسن لی، علی مراد؛ فرشادفر، محسن و صفری، هوشمند (1387). مقایسه عملکرد و صفات فیزیولوژیکی 5گونه یونجه یکساله در شرایط دیم استان کرمانشاه. فصلنامه تحقیقات ژنتیک و اصلاح گیاهان مرتعی و جنگلی ایران، 2(16)، 294-285.
3. اسیلان، کمال و حاجیلویی، سعید (1389). بررسی تأثیر تنش کم آبی بر صفات کمی و کیفی ارقام یونجه (Medicago sativa L). فصلنامه اکوفیزیولوژی گیاهان زراعی، 2(1)، 52-41.
4. اشرفی واثقی، رفیعه؛ مساح بوانی، علیرضا؛ مشکواتی، امیرحسین و رحیم زاده، فاطمه (1398). بررسی رواناب حوضه تحت تاثیر سناریوهای انتشار A2 و B1 با در نظر گرفتن اثر دسته جمعی ensemble مدل های AOGCM. چهارمین کنفرانس مدیریت آب ایران.
5. آذری نصرآباد، علی و رمضانی، حمیدرضا (1390). تجزیه و تحلیل همبستگی و علیت عملکرد دانه و اجزا آن در ارقام سورگوم دانه ای. تولید گیاهان زراعی (مجله الکترونیک تولید گیاهان زراعی)، 4 (2)، 62-51.
6. جهانگرد، حلیمه؛ سلامی، حبیب اله؛ شاهنوشی، ناصر؛ کاظم نژاد، مهدی و صبوحی، محمود (1400). ارزیابی و تحلیل اقتصادی آثار نوسانات اقلیمی بر عملکرد یونجه در ایران با رویکرد تعدیل آثار خشکسالی. تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران، 52(2)، 201-213. [DOI:10.22059/ijaedr.2020.293331.668846]
7. رضایی، مهدی؛ نقوی، محمدرضا؛ معالی امیری، رضا؛ محمدی، رحمت؛ اشرف جعفری، علی و کابلی، محمدمهدی (1390). ارزیابی تنوع اکوتیپ های یونجه ایرانی با استفاده از اجزای کیفی علوفه. فصلنامه تحقیقات ژنتیک و اصلاح گیاهان مرتعی و جنگلی ایران، 1 (19)، 54-39.
8. زمانیان، محمد (1388). بررسی و مقایسه پتانسیل عملکرد علوفه ارقام شبدر قرمز. مجله به نژادی نهال و بذر (نهال و بذر)، 25 (1)، 95-108.
9. شهنوازی، علی (1399). بررسی سودآوری زراعت یونجه، با توجه به شاخص رطوبتی در ایران. مجله ترویجی علوفه و خوراک دام، 1(2)، 42-33.
10. طباطبایی، علی؛ شاکری، احسان و علی نیا، مژگان (1396). تأثیر زمان های برداشت بر عملکرد علوفه و میزان پروتئین رقم های مختلف یونجه در منطقه یزد. مجله اکوفیزیولوژی گیاهی، 9 (21)، 156-146.
11. فرزانجو، موسی؛ مقدم، علی؛ نارویی راد، محمدرضا و کوهکن، شیرعلی (1385). گزارش نهایی سلکسیون توده ای در یونجه های محلی زابل. موسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر.
12. قدمی فیروزآبادی، علی و سیدان، محسن (1398). بررسی بهره وری آبیاری و تحلیل اقتصادی محصول یونجه در سامانه های آبیاری بارانی و سطحی. نشریه مهندسی آبیاری و آب ایران، 149-136.
13. گزارش سالانه مدیریت جهاد کشاورزی سیستان (2021). سطح زیر کشت محصولات زراعی منطقه سیستان.
14. محمد قاسمی، محمود؛ قاسمی, احمد؛ دهمرده، مجید و عفتی، محمد ( 1402). بهینه‌یابی اثرات سطوح آبیاری و پتاسیم بر عملکرد سورگوم علوفه‌ای در شرایط بحران آب منطقه سیستان. اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه، 31(4)، 245-265 [DOI:10.30490/aead.2023.361520.1502]
15. محمدزاده، آرش؛ مهدوی دامغانی، عبدالمجید؛ وفابخش، جواد و دیهیم فرد، رضا (1397). کارایی بومشناختی- اقتصادی تولید یونجه (Medicago sativa L) و ذرت علوفه‌ای (Zea mays L) دشت مراغه - بناب، استان آذربایجان شرقی. بومشناسی کشاورزی، 10(3)، 895-875 .
16. مفیدیان، محمدعلی؛ آقاشاهی، علیرضا و مقدم، علی ( 1392). عملکرد کمی و کیفی علوفه اکوتیپ های یونجه مناطق سرد سیر ایران. مجله به نژادی نهال و بذر، 1 (29)، 729-745.
17. نعمتی، عادل و فراستی، سیروس (1392). بررسی اثرات اقتصادی- اجتماعی پروژه پرورش گاو شیری برای زنان روستایی استان های کرمانشاه و لرستان پروژه. دفتر برنامه ریزی و پایش امور پژوهشی.
18. نکوئیان‌فر، زهرا؛ لک، شهرام و عبادوز، غلامرضا (1396). تأثیر زمان برداشت و شوری خاک بر عملکرد کمی و کیفی علوفه پنج رقم یونجه در اهواز . تولیدات گیاهی، 40 (30)، 127-113.
19. Azari Nasrabadi, A., & Ramezani, H. (2011). Analysis of correlation and causality of grain yield and its components in grain alfalfa cultivars. Crop Production (Electronic Journal of Crop Production), 4(2), 51-62. (In Persian)
20. Abdullah Mahmood, M. (2019). Estimation of Economic Efficiency and the Production Function of Alfalfa Crop in DiyalaGovernorate, Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science, 12(1), 34-41.
21. Annual Report of Sistan Jihad Agriculture Management. (2021). Area Under Cultivation of Agricultural Products in Sistan Region. (In Persian)
22. Asadi, H. (2023). Analysis of Economic Productivity and Improvement of Corn Production Performance in Rural Areas of Kermanshah County. Journal of Spatial Economics and Rural Development, 12(2), 44. (In Persian)
23. Ashrafi Vaseghi, R., Masam Bovani, G., Moshghavati, A., and Rahimzadeh, W. (2019). Investigation of runoff in the basin affected by A2 and B1 emission scenarios considering the collective effects of AOGCM models. Fourth Conference on Water Management in Iran. (In Persian)
24. Asilan, K., & Hajilouei, S. (2010). Investigation of the Effect of Water Stress on Quantitative and Qualitative Traits of Alfalfa Varieties (Medicago sativa L.). Scientific-Research Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 2(1), 41-52. (In Persian)
25. Engels, F.M., and Jung, H.G., 2018. Alfalfa stem tissues: cell-wall development and lignification. Ann. Bototani., 82, 561-568.
26. Esfandiari, S., Hasanli, A., Farshadfar, M., & Safari, H. (2008). Comparison of yield and physiological characteristics of five annual alfalfa species under rainfed conditions in Kermanshah province. Iranian Journal of Range and Forest Plant Genetic and Breeding Research, 16(2), 285-294 . (In Persian)
27. Farzanju, M., Moghadam, A., Narouei Rad, M., & Kohkan, Sh. (2006). Final Report on Mass Selection in Zabol Local Alfalfa. Seed and Plant Improvement Research Institute. (In Persian)
28. Ghadami Firuzabadi, A. and Seydan, S.M. (2019). Assessment of irrigation efficiency and economic analysis of alfalfa production in sprinkler and surface irrigation systems. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Water Engineering 149-136. (In Persian)
29. Jahangard, H., Salami, H., Shahnooshi, N., Kazemnejad, M., & Sabouhi, M. (2021). Economic Evaluation and Analysis of Climate Fluctuations on Alfalfa Yield in Iran with a Drought Impact Adjustment Approach. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 52(2), 201-213. (In Persian) [DOI:10.22059/ijaedr.2020.293331.668846]
30. Karimi, H. (2020). Cultivation and Breeding of Forage Plants. University of Tehran Press. 428 pages.
31. Khalidi, K., Heydari, Reza. (2022). Investigating the role of agricultural insurance on the rural economy of Iran, focusing on the agricultural sector. Village and Development, 26(1), 251-274. (In Persian)
33. Lee A., Schwarz G., Newman A., Legood A.(2007). Investigating when andwhy psychological entitlement predicts unethical pro-organizationalbehavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(1), 109-126. [DOI:10.1007/s10551-017-3456-z]
34. Mirzaeinadushan, H.( 2019). One-year alfalfa (genetics and breeding). Publications of Iran's Forests and Pastures Research Institute, 213 p. (In Persian)
35. Mofidian, M., Aghashahi, A., & Moghadam, A. (2013). Quantitative and Qualitative Forage Yield of Alfalfa Ecotypes in Cold Regions of Iran. Journal of Seed and Plant Breeding, 1-29, 729-745. (In Persian)
36. Mohammad Ghasemi, M., Ghasemi, A., Dahmardeh, M., & Eftekhari, M. (2023). Optimization of Irrigation and Potassium Levels on Forage Sorghum Yield under Water Crisis Conditions in Sistan Region. Agricultural Economics and Development, 31(4), 245-265. (In Persian) [DOI:10.30490/aead.2023.361520.1502]
37. Mohammadzadeh, A., Mahdavi Damghani, A., Vafabakhsh, J., & Deyhimfard, R. (2018). Agro-Economic Efficiency of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and Forage Corn (Zea mays L.) Production in Maragheh-Bonab Plain, East Azarbaijan Province. Agricultural Ecology, 10(3), 875-895. (In Persian)
38. Nekouianfar, Z., Lak, S., & Ebadooz, Gh. (2017). Effect of Harvest Time and Soil Salinity on Quantitative and Qualitative Forage Yield of Five Alfalfa Varieties in Ahvaz. Plant Production, 40(3), 113-127. (In Persian)
39. Nemat,. and Farahati, S. (2013). Investigation of the socio-economic effects of dairy cow breeding project for rural women in Kermanshah and Lorestan provinces. Research Affairs Planning and Monitoring Office. (In Persian)
40. Osterholz, O.W., Renz, M. J., & Grabber, J.H. (2020). Alfalfa establishment by interseeding with silage corn projected toincrease profitability of corn silage–alfalfa rotations, Agronomy Journal, 112(5), 4120-4132.
41. Rezaei, M., Naghavi, M., Maali Amiri, R., Mohammadi, R., Ashraf Jafari, A., & Kaboli, M. (2011). Evaluation of Diversity in Iranian Alfalfa Ecotypes Using Forage Quality Components. Scientific-Research Journal of Genetic and Plant Breeding Research of Rangelands and Forests of Iran, 1(19), 39-54. (In Persian)
42. Sardar Sharaki, A., Karim. M.H. (2020). The Economic Efficiency Trend of Date Orchards in Saravan County, Iran. Econ.(in farsi) Rev. 22(4), 1093-1112. (In Persian)
43. Shahnavazi, A. (2020). Investigation of Alfalfa Farming Profitability, Considering the Moisture Index in Iran. Journal of Forage and Livestock Feed Extension, 1(2), 33-42. (In Persian)
44. Tabatabaei, A., Shakeri, A., & Mozhgan, M. (2017). Effect of Harvesting Times on Forage Yield and Protein Content of Different Alfalfa Varieties in Yazd Region. Scientific Research Journal of Plant Ecophysiology, 9(21), 146-156.
45. Taran, Thi Cam Thanh and Ngoc Tien Nguyen (2019). “Identify Factors AffectingBusiness Efficiency of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs): Evidence fromVietnam”, Management Science Letters, 9(12).
46. Zamanian, M. (2009). Investigation and Comparison of Forage Yield Potential of Red Clover Varieties. Journal of Seed and Plant Breeding (Nahal va Bazr), 1(25), 95-108. (In Persian)
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
