دوره 9، شماره 4 - ( دوره نهم، شماره چهارم، زمستان 1400 )
جلد 9 شماره 4 صفحات 69-54 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Behrouzi A, Bakhshipour A, Aliloo M M. The Effect of Positive and Negative Mood Induction on Risky Decision making in adolescents by Moderating High behavioral brain systems.. CPJ 2022; 9 (4) : 64
URL: http://jcp.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3500-fa.html
URL: http://jcp.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3500-fa.html
بهروزی آوا، بخشی پور عباس، علیلو مجید محمود. اثر القای خلق مثبت و منفی بر تصمیم‌گیری پرخطر نوجوانان با تعدیلگری سیستم‌های مغزی رفتاری بالا. فصلنامه روانشناسی شناختی. 1400; 9 (4) :54-69
دانشگاه سراسری تبریز ، abbas_bakhshipour@yahoo.com
چکیده: (4453 مشاهده)
اخذ تصمیمات پرخطر در نوجوانان به یک نگرانی اصلی برای بهداشت عمومی تبدیل‌شده است و فهم همبسته‌های مؤثر بر این فرایند امکان عملی کردن طرح‌هایی برای پیشگیری را فراهم می‌کند، ازاین‌رو مطالعه‌ی حاضر باهدف بررسی اثر القای خلق مثبت و منفی بر تصمیم‌گیری پرخطر نوجوانان با تعدیلگری سیستم‌های مغزی رفتاری بالا صورت گرفت. ابتدا 327 نوجوان 13-18 سال شهر اصفهان به‌صورت در دسترس انتخاب و از طریق پرسشنامه‌ی سیستم‌های مغزی رفتاری BAS/BIS غربالگری شدند، از میان آن‌ها و براساس نمره‌ی استاندارد دو گروه 24 نفری شامل BAS/BIS و بالا انتخاب شدند، اعضای هر گروه به‌صورت تصادفی به دو زیرگروه 12 نفر تقسیم گشته و از طریق قطعه فیلم‌های هیجانی نیمی در معرض خلق مثبت و نیمی در معرض خلق منفی قرار گرفتند و آزمون خطرپذیری بادکنکی BART و مقیاس عاطفه‌ی مثبت و منفی PANAS را پیش و پس از القای خلق تکمیل کردند. نتایج تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها با روش تحلیل کوواریانس عاملی تک متغیره نشان داد که بین القای خلق مثبت و منفی بر تصمیم‌گیری پرخطر تفاوت معناداری وجود دارد 0/05≥P و خلق مثبت منجر به افزایش تصمیمات پرخطر می‌شود. همچنین یافته‌ها حاکی از این بود که سیستم‌های مغزی رفتاری به‌عنوان خصایص زیستی شخصیت، اثر القای خلق بر تصمیم‌گیری پرخطر را به‌طور معناداری تعدیل می‌کنند0/05 ≥p. بدین معنا که افراد با سیستم فعال‌ساز رفتاری بالا هنگام مواجه با خلق مثبت فزون‌کنشی بیشتری داشته و نسبت به افراد با سیستم بازداری رفتاری بیشتر درگیر خطر می‌شوند درحالی‌که افراد با سیستم بازداری رفتاری به خلق منفی و نشانه‌های تنبیه حساسیت بیشتری نشان داده و محتاط‌ترند.
شماره‌ی مقاله: 64
نوع مطالعه: كاربردي |
موضوع مقاله:
روانشناسی شناختی
دریافت: 1400/7/14 | پذیرش: 1400/11/13 | انتشار: 1400/11/17
دریافت: 1400/7/14 | پذیرش: 1400/11/13 | انتشار: 1400/11/17
فهرست منابع
1. Balconi, M., Falbo, L., & Brambilla, E. (2009). BIS/BAS responses to emotional cues: Self-report, autonomic measure, and alpha band modulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(8), 858-863. doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.004. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.004]
2. Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American psychologist, 36(2), 129.doi/10.1037/0003066X.36.2.129 [DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.36.2.129]
3. Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 67(2), 319.Doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319]
4. Casey, B. J. (2015). Beyond simple models of self-control to circuit-based accounts of adolescent behavior. Annual review of psychology, 66, 295-319.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015156 [DOI:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015156]
5. Corr, P. J., & Cooper, A. J. (2016). The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality questionnaire (RST-PQ): development and validation. Psychological assessment, 28(11), 1427-1440.doi: 10.1037/pas0000273. [DOI:10.1037/pas0000273]
6. O'Connor, R. M., Stewart, S. H., & Watt, M. C. (2009). Distinguishing BAS risk for university students' drinking, smoking, and gambling behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(4), 514-519. doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.12.002. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2008.12.002]
7. Defoe, I. N., Dubas, J. S., Figner, B., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2015). A meta-analysis on age differences in risky decision making: Adolescents versus children and adults. Psychological Bulletin, 141(1), 48-84. doi.org/10.1037/a0038088. [DOI:10.1037/a0038088]
8. Gaher, R. M., Hahn, A. M., Shishido, H., Simons, J. S., & Gaster, S. (2015). Associations between sensitivity to punishment, sensitivity to reward, and gambling. Addictive behaviors, 42, 180-184. doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.11.014. [DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.11.014]
9. Gray, J. A. (1990). Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cognition & emotion, 4(3), 269-288. doi.org/10.1080/02699939008410799. [DOI:10.1080/02699939008410799]
10. Hamilton, K. R., Smith, J. F., Gonçalves, S. F., Nketia, J. A., Tasheuras, O. N., Yoon, M., ... & Shackman, A. J. (2020). Striatal bases of temporal discounting in early adolescents. Neuropsychologia, 144, 107492. doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107492. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107492]
11. Herman AM, Critchley HD and Duka T (2018) Risk-Taking and Impulsivity: The Role of Mood States and Interoception. Front.Psychol. 9:1625.doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01625. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01625]
12. Heilman, R. M., Crişan, L. G., Houser, D., Miclea, M., & Miu, A. C. (2010). Emotion regulation and decision-making under risk and uncertainty. Emotion, 10(2), 257-265. doi.org/10.1037/a0018489 [DOI:10.1037/a0018489]
13. Hundt, N. E., Brown, L. H., Kimbrel, N. A., Walsh, M. A., Nelson-Gray, R., & Kwapil, T. R. (2013). Reinforcement sensitivity theory predicts positive and negative affect in daily life. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(3), 350-354.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.09.021 [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2012.09.021]
14. Isen, A. M., & Patrick, R. (1983). The effect of positive feelings on risk-taking: When the chips are down. Organizational behavior and human performance, 31(2), 194-202.doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073 (83)90120-4 [DOI:10.1016/0030-5073(83)90120-4]
15. Jauregi, A., Kessler, K., & Hassel, S. (2018). Linking cognitive measures of response inhibition and reward sensitivity to trait impulsivity. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2306.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02306. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02306]
16. Kim, D. Y., & Lee, J. H. (2011). Effects of the BAS and BIS on decision-making in a gambling task. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(7), 1131-1135.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.041. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.041]
17. Kusev, P., Purser, H., Heilman, R., Cooke, A. J., Van Schaik, P., Baranova, V., & Ayton, P. (2017). Understanding risky behavior: the influence of cognitive, emotional and hormonal factors on decision-making under risk. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 102.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00102 [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00102]
18. Kann, L., McManus, T., Harris, W. A., Shanklin, S. L., Flint, K. H., Queen, B., ... & Ethier, K. A. (2018). Youth risk behavior surveillance-the United States, 2017. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 67(8), 1.doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss6708a1 [DOI:10.15585/mmwr.ss6708a1]
19. Kuppens, P., Oravecz, Z., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2010). Feelings change: Accounting for individual differences in the temporal dynamics of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(6), 1042-1060. doi.org/10.1037/a0020962. [DOI:10.1037/a0020962]
20. Li, Y., Xu, Y., & Chen, Z. (2015). Effects of the behavioral inhibition system (BIS), behavioral activation system (BAS), and emotion regulation on depression: A one-year follow-up study in Chinese adolescents. Psychiatry Research, 230(2), 287-293.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2015.09.007. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2015.09.007]
21. Lejuez, C. W., Read, J. P., Kahler, C. W., Richards, J. B., Ramsey, S. E., Stuart, G. L., Strong, D. R., & Brown, R. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk-taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8(2), 75- 84. doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.75. [DOI:10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.75]
22. Laube, C. and van den Bos, W. (2016), "Hormones and Affect in Adolescent Decision Making", Recent Developments in Neuroscience Research on Human Motivation (Advances in Motivation and Achievement, Vol. 19), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 259-281.doi.org/10.1108/S0749-742320160000019013. [DOI:10.1108/S0749-742320160000019013]
23. Leshem, R. (2016). Brain development, impulsivity, risky decision making, and cognitive control: Integrating cognitive and socioemotional processes during adolescence-an introduction to the special Issue. Developmental neuropsychology, 41(1-2), 1-5.doi: 10.1080/87565641.2016.1187033. [DOI:10.1080/87565641.2016.1187033]
24. Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision-making. Annual review of psychology, 66, 799-823.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043. [DOI:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043]
25. Loewenstein, G., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The role of affect in decision making. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 619-642). Oxford University Press.
26. Marszał-Wiśniewska, M., & Nowicka, M. (2018). Individual differences in mood changes. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(5), 1415-1438.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9879-5 [DOI:10.1007/s10902-017-9879-5]
27. Morrongiello, B. A., Stewart, J., Pope, K., Pogrebtsova, E., & Boulay, K. J. (2015). Exploring relations between positive mood state and school-age children's risk taking. Journal of pediatric psychology, 40(4), 406-418.doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsu100 [DOI:10.1093/jpepsy/jsu100]
28. Merchán-Clavellino, A., Alameda-Bailén, J. R., Zayas García, A., & Guil, R. (2019). Mediating effect of trait emotional intelligence between the behavioral activation system (BAS)/behavioral inhibition system (BIS) and positive and negative affect. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 424.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00424. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00424]
29. Pickering, A., & Corr, P. J. (2008). JA Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) of personality. The SAGE handbook of personality: Theory and assessment personality measurement and testing, 2, 239-255. DOI:10.4135/9781849200462.n11 [DOI:10.4135/9781849200462.n11]
30. Royal, J. D., & Kurtz, J. L. (2010). I ate what?! The effect of stress and dispositional eating style on food intake and behavioral awareness. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 565-569.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.04.022. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2010.04.022]
31. Rafieinia P. "The role of extraversion and neuroticism personality dimensions and positive and negative mood on emotional information processing and cardiovascular responses". Tehran, Tarbiat Modarres University 2007. [Persian].doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.08.018
32. Rottenberg, J., Ray, R. D., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Emotion elicitation using films. In Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment (pp. 9-28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Stafford, L. D., Ng, W., Moore, R. A., & Bard, K. A. (2010). Bolder, happier, smarter: The role of extraversion in positive mood and cognition. Personality and individual differences, 48(7), 827-832. doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.005. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.005]
34. Stanton S. Reeck C. Huettel S. LaBar K. (2014). Effects of induced moods on economic choices. Judg. Decis. Mak. 9, 167 -175.journal.sjdm.org/12/12924b/jdm12924b.pdf.
35. Shukla, M., Rasmussen, E. C., & Nestor, P. G. (2019). Emotion and decision-making: Induced mood influences IGT scores and deck selection strategies. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 41(4), 341-352. doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2018.1562049. [DOI:10.1080/13803395.2018.1562049]
36. Schlösser, T. Dunning, D. and Fetchenhauer, D. (2013). What a feeling: the role of immediate and anticipated emotions in risky decisions. Behav. Decis. Mak.26, 13-30.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.757. [DOI:10.1002/bdm.757]
37. Suhr, J. A., & Tsanadis, J. (2007). Affect and personality correlates of the Iowa Gambling Task. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(1), 27-36 .doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.004 [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.004]
38. Shevchenko, Y. (2018). The influence of mood on decision-making. Universitaet Mannheim (Germany).
39. Toyoshima, K., Inoue, T., Kameyama, R., Masuya, J., Fujimura, Y., Higashi, S., & Kusumi, I. (2021). BIS/BAS as moderators in the relationship between stressful life events and depressive symptoms in adult community volunteers. Journal of Affective Disorders Reports, 3, 100050.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2020.100050 [DOI:10.1016/j.jadr.2020.100050]
40. Verduyn, P., & Brans, K. (2012). The relationship between extraversion, neuroticism and aspects of trait affect. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(6), 664-669.doi/10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.017 [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.017]
41. Vermeersch H, TSjoen G, Kaufman JM, and Houtte MV, on adolescent risk-taking: The relevance of behavioral inhibition and activation, Youth & Soc. 2011; 45(1):27-53. doi.org/10.1177%2F0044118X11409014 [DOI:10.1177/0044118X11409014]
42. Victor, E. C., & Hariri, A. R. (2016). A neuroscience perspective on sexual risk behavior in adolescence and emerging adulthood. Development and psychopathology, 28(2), 471-487.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579415001042 [DOI:10.1017/S0954579415001042]
43. Westermann, R., Spies, K., Stahl, G., & Hesse, F. W. (1996). Relative effectiveness and validity of mood induction procedures: A meta‐analysis. European Journal of social psychology, 26(4), 557-580. doi.org/10.1002/ (SICI) 1099-0992(199607)26:4%3C557: AID-EJSP769%3E3.0.CO; 2-4
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199607)26:4<557::AID-EJSP769>3.0.CO;2-4 [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199607)26:43.0.CO;2-4]
44. Watson, D. Clark, L. A. & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063.DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063]
45. Westermann, R., Spies, K., Stahl, G., & Hesse, F. W. (1996). Relative effectiveness and validity of mood induction procedures: a meta- analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 557-580. doi/10.1002/ (SICI) 1099-0992(199607)26:4%3C557: AID-EJSP769%3E3.0.CO; 2-4
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199607)26:4<557::AID-EJSP769>3.0.CO;2-4 [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199607)26:43.0.CO;2-4]
46. Wardell, J. D., Read, J. P., & Colder, C. R. (2013). The role of behavioral inhibition and behavioral approach systems in the associations between mood and alcohol consequences in college: A longitudinal multilevel analysis. Addictive behaviors, 38(11), 2772-2781.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.07.012 [DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.07.012]
47. Yang, Q., Zhao, D., Wu, Y., Tang, P., GU, R., & Luo, Y. J. (2018). Differentiating the influence of incidental anger and fear on risk decision-making. Physiology & behavior, 184, 179-188.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.11.028. [DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.11.028]
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
