Volume 21, Issue 60 (3-2021)
jgs 2021, 21(60): 219-238 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
naghdi A, Mafia E, vatanparast M. (2021). Analysis of status of resilience indices in urban fabric (Case study: Faruj worn out fabric). jgs. 21(60), 219-238. doi:10.52547/jgs.21.60.219
URL: http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3490-en.html
URL: http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3490-en.html
1- Department of Geography, Shirvan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shirvan, Iran, Farouj - Successful Street 18
2- Department of Geography, Shirvan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shirvan, Iran, Farouj - Successful Street 18 ,Ezzatolah_mafi@yahoo.com
2- Department of Geography, Shirvan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shirvan, Iran, Farouj - Successful Street 18 ,
Abstract: (11101 Views)
Themain purpose of this research is to analyze status of resilience indicesin the worn out and old fabricof Farujcity. Inthis regard, 32 indicators in four dimensions of physical-environmental, social, economic and institutional-managerial were selected based on theoretical studies of the research. In the next step, a questionnairebased on these indicators was designed and distributed among the residents of the study area. A total of 380 households participated in completion of questionnaires. Then, the collected data were entered into SPSS and analyzed by single sample t-test.Four dimensions of resilience were compared with each other and based on average scores. The results indicated that resilience in the institutional-management dimension with the average score of 2.70 is ranked first. Thesecond rank of resilience was for the physical-environmental dimension with a mean score of 2.47. Finally, social and economic dimensions were ranked third and fourth, respectively. Inanother section of the study, the importance coefficient of each indicator was estimated based on experts' opinions. Then, the results were integrated and indicators with higher priorities were identified. In this method, we are looking for indicators with a low average score but a high coefficient of importance. Based on the analysis, we found nine indicators with these characteristics, of which we can refer to indicators such as access to temporary accommodation, awarenessabout the occurrence of natural and human disasters in the neighborhood, the level of awareness about reactions, how to behave appropriately during the crisis, job security, financial strength of residentsto participate in resolving the crisis, and the extent to which the insurance organizations support the residents.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Geography and Urban Planning
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)