[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Publication statistics::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Publication Information
ju Publisher
Kharazmi University
ju Managing Director 
Nasergholi Sarli
ju Editor-in-Chief
Habib-Allah Abbasi
ju Manager
Zahra Saberi
ju In charge of the Site
Tahereh sadate Mirahmadi

EISSN 24766941
..
Indexing Databases

  AWT IMAGE   AWT IMAGE 
 AWT IMAGE   AWT IMAGE 
  AWT IMAGE 

   

..
Social Networks
   
..
:: year 29, Issue 91 (12-2021) ::
Persian Language and Literature 2021, 29(91): 237-260 Back to browse issues page
Semantic Interpretation of Persian Onomatopoeic Words Based on Word Formation Patterns
Rahele Gandomkar 1, Banafsheh Mesgari2
1- Allameh Tabataba’i University , r.gandomkar@atu.ac.ir
2- Allameh Tabataba’i University
Abstract:   (2446 Views)
The current paper aimed to conduct a corpus analysis of the relationship between Persian onomatopoeic words and their morphological meanings. All onomatopoeic words listed in The Dictionary of Onomatopoeic Words in Farsi (1996) were analyzed. The analysis of the morphological structure of 2570 onomatopoeic words suggests that there is a correlation between echo duplication and the concept of emphasizing. Partial reduplication indicates the continuance of the meaning of words. Total reduplication of words with a final plosive consonant represents the discontinuance of the meaning of onomatopoeic words. Double reduplications that use an interfix carry on the impression of friction. The reduplicated words that have fricative or affricative consonants suggest the idea of slight events. Echo duplication containing the interfix “va” constructs plurality and multitude. Contrary to the findings of previous studies, the intensity accompanies derivation and not reduplication. The data also suggests that Persian onomatopoeic words use phonetic as well as morphological tools to construe the meaning. 

 
Keywords: onomatopoeia, onomatopoeic word, morphology, reduplication, semantic interpretation
Full-Text [PDF 6008 kb]   (708 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
References
1. ابومحبوب، احمد (1388) «کارکرد نام و آواها در غزليات مولانا». کتاب ماه ادبيات. سال سوم. شمارة ۳۰ (۱۴۴): 24-19.
2. اعتباري، زهرا (1397) «تحليل ‌ساختاري و معنايي نام‌آواهاي زبان گيلکي در مقايسه با زبان فارسي». ادبيات و زبان‌هاي محلي ايران زمين. دورة هشتم. شمارة 2: 1-24.
3. بياباني، احمدرضا؛ يحيي طالبيان و محسن محمدي کردياني (1395) «بررسي کارکردهاي نام‌آوا در هشت‌کتاب سپهري». نثرپژوهي ادب فارسي. 19 (40): 25-48.
4. داوري اردکاني، نگار، و حسين مغاني (1394) «تحليل نام‌آواهاي رايج در گويش دشستاني: رويکردي ساختاري و معنايي». زبان‌پژوهي. شمارة 15: 83-105.
5. ساسلي، عزيز (1390) بررسي تطبيقي نام‌آواهاي زبان فارسي و کُردي سوراني. پايان‌نامة کارشناسي‌ارشد. دانشکدة علوم انساني. مرکز پيام‌نور تهران.
6. شقاقي، ويدا (1392) مباني صرف. تهران: سمت.
7. صفوي، کورش (۱۳۹۹) واژه. تهران: علمي.
8. طارميلر، هادي (1382) «گزارشي از اصوات در ديوان شمس». رشد و آموزش زبان و ادب فارسي. شمارة 65: 16-19.
9. قاسمي، مسعود (1377) «اسم صوت و کاربردهاي يک نام‌آوا در فارسي و عربي». نامة پارسي. شمارة 9: 52-49.
10. مايل‌هروي، نجيب (1374) «پسوندي نام‌آواساز در گونه‌هاي فارسي خراساني». نامة فرهنگستان. شمارة 2: 73-68.
11. محمدي، علي، و عبدالستار نقشبندي (1374) «تحليل و بررسي نام‌آواها در زبان کردي و پژوهشي در مصداق‌هاي کردي و فارسي آن». پژوهش‌هاي زبانشناسي تطبيقي. شمارة 9: 243-256.
12. محمدي، علي، و ماندانا کمرخاني (1393) «صدامعنايي در شعر گفتاری معاصر». ادب‌پژوهي. شمارة 27- 137- 162.
13. محيي‌الدين قمشه‌اي، غلامرضا (1390) تصويرگونگي در ساخت‌هاي آوايي، صرفي و نحوي زبان فارسي. رسالة دکتري. دانشگاه علامه طباطبائي. دانشکدة ادبيات فارسي و زبان‌هاي خارجي.
14. مدرسي قوامي، گلناز (۱۳۹۶) راهنماي آوانويسي و واج‌نويسي زبان فارسي. تهران: دانشگاه علامه طباطبائي.
15. نيکوبخت، ناصر (1383) «‌صوت‌آواها و نظرية منشأ زبان». پژوهش‌هاي ادبي. دورة اول. شمارة ۳: ۱۱۵-۱۳۲.
16. وحيديان کاميار، تقي (1375) فرهنگ نام‌آواها در زبان فارسي. مشهد: دانشگاه فردوسي مشهد.
17. Attridge, D. (1988) Peculiar Language: Literature as Difference from the Renaissance. Routledge. Oxfordshire, UK
18. Bredin, H. (1996) "Onomatopoeia as a Figure and a Linguistic Principle". New Literary History, 27(3), 555-569. Retrieved July 9, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20057371 [DOI:10.1353/nlh.1996.0031]
19. Itagaki, S. (2019) A Study on Sound Symbolism: The Cognitive and Neural Mechanism Underlying the Sound-meaning Correspondence in Language. Doshisha University. Graduate School of Life and Medical Sciences. Kyoto City, Japan.
20. Laing, C. (2019) "A role for onomatopoeia in early language: evidence from phonological development". Language and Cognition. 11(2). 173-187. [DOI:10.1017/langcog.2018.23]
21. Hockett, C. (1963). The problem of universals in language. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (pp. 1-22). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Hinton, L., Nichols, J., & Ohala, J. J. (1994). Sound-symbolic processes.In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp. 1-14). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511751806.001]
23. Masuda, K. (2002) A Phonetic Study of Sound Symbolism. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Cambridge, UK
24. Mueller-Vollmer, Kurt and Markus Messling (2017) "Wilhelm von Humboldt", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = .
25. Richards, J. et. al. (1985) Longman dictionary of linguistics. London: Longman.
26. Sasamoto. R. (2019) Onomatopoeia and Relevance: Communication of Impressions Via Sound. Palgrave studies in sound. Springer International Publishing. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-26318-8]
27. Sidhu, D.M., Pexman, P.M. (2018) "Five mechanisms of sound symbolic association". Psychon Bull Rev 25, 1619-1643. [DOI:10.3758/s13423-017-1361-1]
28. Vihman, M. (1978) "Consonant Harmony: its Scope and its Function". Universals of Human Language. Vol 2. 231-334.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Gandomkar R, Mesgari B. Semantic Interpretation of Persian Onomatopoeic Words Based on Word Formation Patterns. Persian Language and Literature 2021; 29 (91) :237-260
URL: http://jpll.khu.ac.ir/article-1-4094-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
year 29, Issue 91 (12-2021) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه  زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه خوارزمی Half-Yearly Persian Language and Literature
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 42 queries by YEKTAWEB 4666